Title: Valuing Businesses In Matrimonial Disputes
1Valuing Businesses In Matrimonial
Disputes PRESENTED BY Brian Spence / Martin
Berry NIFA Network of Independent Forensic
Accountants
2Overview
- The role of a forensic accountant in
matrimonial disputes - Some concepts of value
- Methods of valuation
- Which method to use
- Earnings basis valuation
- - Sustainable earnings and true profit
- - Scope for manipulation
- Taxation issues
3THE ROLE OF THE FORENSIC ACCOUNTANT
- To advise on the value of the business
- - Unincorporated goodwill
- - Incorporated the value of unquoted
shares - To identify any suppressed or hidden
assets/wealth - To gather the financial evidence
- To advise on specific areas such as pension
considerations - To advise on taxation issues
- To advise in settlement negotiations
4VALUATION METHODS
Three basic methods-
- Earnings Method (based on future maintainable
earnings) - Net Assets Method
- Dividend Method
-
- There are other methods such as the discounted
cash flow method
5WHICH METHOD TO USE?
Earnings - Applies mainly to whole company
valuations and to controlling
and substantial minority shareholdings Dividen
ds Yield - small uninfluential minority
shareholdings Net Assets - used mainly
for controlling shareholdings in property
investment companies, investment trust
companies and where income return is
low in relation to assets employed 2 Types
of asset valuation
- going concern
basis
- break-up basis
6WHICH METHOD TO USE? (continued.)
- Need to consider-
- Size, type and rights of shareholding
- - Articles of Association
- - Companies Acts
- Real influence of the shareholding
- - Relationship of shareholder to other
shareholders - - Does the shareholding hold the
balance of power? - - Shareholders agreements
- Specific requirements of the
Articles of Association -
7Rights of shareholdings
850/50 Shareholders
Need to review Articles of Association and
statutory books and consider-
- Does Chairman have a casting vote?
- Is there evidence that a Chairman has
been appointed? - Can business be transacted without a
quorum?(Regulation 41 Table A Companies Act
1985) - Are there pre-emption rights?
- How easy would it be to sell shares to
an outside party? - Can directors refuse to register a transfer?
933.3 Shareholding
Consider the following two scenarios-
- 3 shareholders each owning 33.3 of the issued
share capital - 2 shareholders, one owning 33.3 of the issued
share capital and the other owning 66.7. - The value of the 33.3 shareholding under
scenario (a) is worth more than the same size
holding under scenario (b) as it holds the
balance of control if offered for sale
10THE VALUE OF A COMPANYS SHARE GENERALLY DERIVES
FROM ITS ABILITY TO EARN PROFITS AND PAY DIVIDENDS
11EARNINGS METHOD
- Steps
- Identify sustainable earnings
- Capitalise sustainable earnings
- Separation of surplus assets
12SUSTAINABLE EARNINGS
- These are the expected future normal recurring
net profits after corporation tax - Logical to take into account the historical
profits of a number of years i.e. between
3 and 5 years adjusted accounting
profits - Must also consider the future profitability
of the company - Companys worth based on its future profit
stream
13TRUE PROFITS
The forensic accountant needs to establish the
TRUE profitability of the
business TRUE PROFITS NORMAL RECURRING
SUSTAINABLE NET
PROFITS He needs comparable historic profits, as
well as, evidence of the
likely comparable future profits of the
business. Invariably, adjustments will need
to be reported profits
to normalise the results and to establish the
true profits.
14ESTABLISHING TRUE PROFITS
- The forensic accountant will review historic
accounts and any current management
accounts to- - Identify and seek explanations for unusual
variations in sales,cost of sales, gross profit
and expenses - Identify and seek explanations for unusual
variations in balance sheet figures - Ensure a consistent application of accounting
policies and financial reporting standards
to the preparation of the accounts - Search for areas of manipulation and
concealment - Identify the adjustments needed to reported
profits to ensure comparability
from one year to the next in order to
calculate normal sustainable profits.
15UNUSUAL VARIATIONS IN THE PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
MAY ARISE FROM-
-
- Changes in circumstances
- Non arms length trading / parallel trading
- Non recurring and exceptional items
- Private expenditure included in P/L account
- Expenses covering more than one year
- Excessive directors remuneration
- Cut off errors
- and of course MANIPULATED figures
- Adjustments not made will lead to an over or
under valuation of the business.
16EXAMPLES OF CHANGE OF CIRCUMSTANCES
- Loss of major customer/contracts
- New major customer/contracts gained
- Change of premises/location
- Recent rent increases
- Changes in the Law, EC directives, regulation
requirements
All of these can affect comparability of accounts
17EXAMPLES OF NON-ARMS LENGTH TRADING/PARALLEL
TRADING
- Management charges receivable from or
payable to a related business - Sales/purchases at an under-value to or
from a related business - Diversion of sales to another business
- Effect will be to distort the profits of the two
related businesses
18EXAMPLES OF NON-RECURRING
EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS
- Exceptional contracts
- R D - capital or revenue
- Legal fees for drawing up a new lease, or
partnership agreement - Exceptional repairs e.g. major refurbishments,
roof renovations or boiler replacement - Costs arising from the discovery and treatment
of toxic substances e.g.
asbestos - Uninsured losses
- Exceptional bad debts
- Accountancy fees re an Inland Revenue
investigation
19EXAMPLES OF PRIVATE EXPENDITURE
- Excess motor vehicle running costs - element
of personal choice - Excess depreciation on the above
- Private employees gardeners,nannies,
and cleaners - Home expenses
- Divorce costs in legal expenses!
- Accountancy fees
- Are these added back?
- In tax computations (unincorporated businesses)
- or declared on forms P11d (directors)
20EXAMPLES OF OTHER ADJUSTMENTS
- Excessive Directors remuneration
- - adjust to reasonable level commensurate with
duties - Regular but not annual expenditure
- e.g costs of attending major exhibitions every
two years - spread the cost evenly - Business premises personally owned by
proprietors/shareholders - - arms length rental?
- - any rental?
- Cut-off errors
21Cut-off errors
- Cut-off is the term used by accountants to
describe the procedures set up around a year end
or accounting reference date which are designed
to ensure that transactions are recorded in the
correct period. - So, sales despatched before the year end should
be in the PL, but sales made after the year end
will fall into next years accounts
22Scope for manipulation
Objective is to find any non-justifiable
adjustments made to the accounts, especially
after the breakdown of the marriage
23Manipulation
- May occur from
- Accelerating costs (e.g. research and
development) - Deferring income (FRS5)
- Unrecorded cash takings
- Stock provisions not required
- Bad debt provisions not required
- Falsifying liquidity and directors loan
accounts - Charging capital items to repairs
- Provision for liabilities/over providing for
costs - Depreciation (changing useful lives and RVs)
- Disposal of fixed assets at an under-value
-
24STOCK AND WIP
- Must be stated at the lower of cost and net
realisable value - This is an area where manipulation of the
accounts could occur, through high stock
provisions,which will - - Reduce the stock and thus the net assets
- - Reduce the profit for the year
- Check how the provisions relate each year to
gross stock value (before provision) - - Have stock provisions increased since the
marriage breakdown?
25(No Transcript)
26DEBTORS
-
- Another area where manipulation of the accounts
could occur is through high bad debt
provisions,which will - - Reduce the debtors and thus the net assets
- - Reduce the profit for the year
- Check how the provisions relate each year to
gross debtors (before provision) - - Have provisions increased since the
breakdown of the relationship? - Note-
- Debtors note in the accounts will also include
as a separate disclosure amounts owed by related
companies
27(No Transcript)
28OTHER DEBTORS
- In accounts of a Limited Company they may
include- - Loans to directors
- Should be disclosed separately in the accounts
if gt 5,000 - May be ignored in the accounts and included
- in other debtors!
- Often arise through the company paying private
bills - Hidden wealth? Obtain full analysis of loan
account movements
29CASH AND BANK BALANCES
- Levels will indicate the liquid position
of the company - Can they be made available for the settlement?
- Levels can be manipulated
- - Paying trade creditors early (investigate
fluctuations) - Buying machinery before the year end
- Withdrawing sums from directors loan
accounts before year end and re-introducing
them after the year end - INVESTIGATE THE LEVELS OF BANK BALANCES
THROUGHOUT THE YEAR TO IDENTIFY MANIPULATION
30(No Transcript)
31FIXED ASSETS Points to consider
- Beware of disposals of fixed assets where
related parties are involved. Not disposed
of at arms length value? - Are the assets being written off too quickly?
Has there been a change in the accounting
policy for depreciation?
32(No Transcript)
33FINAL STEPS
- Review latest management accounts and
any other management information i.e. - - budgets
- - business plans
- Consider the effect of any major changes
on future profits - Decide whether true profits for the last
3 to 5 years are representative of
future profits - - if yes - take a weighted average
- - if no - prepare a projection
34CAPITALISE EARNINGS
- Need to establish a suitable multiple
- Two methods normally used
- P/E ratio
- The investment approach
- required rate of return
35P/E Ratio
- Share price divided by earnings per share
- Uses price/earnings ratio of a comparable quoted
company in the relevant industry sector or the
price/earnings ratio shown by the Financial Times
Actuaries Indices for the sector - PROBLEMS
- Often impossible to find a suitable comparator
company - Generally applicable to minority shareholdings
not suitable for controlling
shareholding - ASSUMES THAT
- Two companies in the same industry with
broadly similar records, earnings, profits
and risks will command similar stock
ratings as expressed in their price
earnings multiple
36PRIVATE COMPANY PRICE INDEX (PCPI)
- Tracks P/Es currently being paid on sale of
private companies - Operated by BDO Stoy Hayward
- Based on available and sufficient information
disclosed on completed private deals - Tends to be based on large private deals
- P/E ratio needs discounting for smaller deals
37P/E Ratio
-
- Applied to after tax profits
- You can work out the share price if you
have the earnings figure - Profits - 37,500 after tax of 30
- P/E ratio 7
- Total value of company 37,500 x 7 262,500
38Investment Approach
This approach assumes that the multiple will
reflect the rate of return a prudent purchaser
would reasonably require
39Rate Of Return
- Prospective purchaser will take into account-
- Rates of return available elsewhere in the
marketplace - The risk factors inherent in the
activities of the business e.g. breadth of
product range, its market and competition,
quality of earnings - is the trade stable,
fashionable,buoyant, or in decline? - Quality of management.
- The potential for growth
- The companys ability to increase the return by
paying higher dividends dividend cover - The assets that would be acquired as part of
the purchase price potential capital return - The level of debt
- Lack of marketability of the share
- Dependency on key personnel
40Shareholdings
The value of a shareholding will depend upon
the proportion held Usually need to discount
capitalised earnings value per share but
not for quasi partnerships (See G v G
(2002) EWHC 1339 (Fam)
41Discounts
- Need to take into account inter alia-
- - Size of shareholding, influences, and extent
of control - Rights
- - Restrictions in the Articles of Association
(i.e. pre-emption clauses) - - Lack of marketability
- - Lack of dividends
42Discount rates
In broad terms these are- Size of
Shareholding Discount 91 - 100 0 75 -
90 5 75 10 50 10 -
15 50 20 49 35 25 60
43Surplus Assets
- Value separately and add to the
valuation - Need to remove related income/costs from the
valuation
44Asset Valuation
- Often a fall back position in negotiation
- Non-trading company with substantial assets
- Companies with low earnings
45Conclusions
- Important to apply the correct basis of
valuation - Must fully investigate the business to
establish the true sustainable profits
and/or the value of the assets - Provides an opportunity to assess the
true liquidity position and the ability of
the business to support further
borrowings and pay increased dividends - Provides an opportunity to find hidden
wealth - Always review entries in directors loan
accounts - Can be a complicated exercise
46TAX IMPLICATIONS
Capital Gains Tax Business Assets
- Applies to the disposal of chargeable assets
- In year of separation asset passes for no
gain/no loss - After the year of separation to date of decree
absolute transfers are treated as made at open
market value (spouses still connected persons) - Business taper relief may be available
- Capital gains annual exemption may be
available (currently 8,500 pa) - Net gain after reliefs chargeable at marginal
rate of tax
47BUSINESS TAPER RELIEF
- Available for disposals after 5 April 1998
- Chargeable gain reduced according to the
length of time for which the asset has been
held - Maximum relief of 75 applies after 2 years of
ownership - For higher rate tax payer this produces an
effective rate of 10
48HOLD-OVER RELIEF
- Is hold-over relief for gifts of business
assets available ? - There was some doubt as consideration was
deemed to be given by the spouse, to whom
the assets are transferred in the form of
surrendered rights, for their transfer - Inland Revenue reviewed approach for new
claims made on or after 31 July 2002 following
comments made by Coleridge J in G v G (2002)
EWHC 1339 (Fam) - Hold-over relief now given where business
assets are transferred between spouses under
the provisions of a Court Order under the
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973