Fairness Integrity Job Growth Right To Work - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Fairness Integrity Job Growth Right To Work

Description:

The Oklahoma Experience ... Between 1990 and 2000, Oklahoma's real household income relative to the national ... RTW passage, Oklahoma experienced immediate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: ssam5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fairness Integrity Job Growth Right To Work


1
FairnessIntegrityJob GrowthRight To Work
2
Right To Work
  • RTW is the freedom for any Hoosier to be hired
    only on the merits of his or her ability.
  • RTW protects every workers right to join, or not
    to join, a union.
  • This fundamental principle prohibits forced
    membership or dues in any organized body and
    instead provides choice.

3
Why it works for Hoosier workers
  • Employees can stop supporting a union without
    being forced to quit their jobs.
  • RTW makes union officials more responsive to
    rank-and-file members.
  • Various Mackinac/Zogby Polls (2004, MRI 1993)
    have shown that over 50 of rank-and-file union
    members support RTW laws.
  • Union officials are forced to bargain for the
    immediate interests of all members.

4
Why we need Right to Work
  • The National Labor Relations Act of 1935 grants
    the right to join unions, but fails to protect
    the right to not join a union.
  • The collective bargaining power of a union
    stifles certain interests while claiming to speak
    for all.

5
(No Transcript)
6
Indiana Losing Ground to RTW States
  • Personal Income
  • 1994-2004 Real Income in RTW states increased
    15.1 percentage-points faster than in Indiana.
  • Population Shifts
  • 1994-2004 RTW states experienced 12 increase
    in 25-34 age bracket, while non-RTW states
    experienced a 7 decline.
  • Indiana experienced 6 decline in that age
    bracket during the same period.

7
Indiana Losing Ground to RTW States
  • 2001 average cost-of-living adjusted income per
    capita
  • Non-RTW states 25,641
  • RTW states 25,940
  • Indiana 25,769

  • (Nelson Drown, Survey and Analysis of Teacher
    Salary Trends 2002, AFT/AFL-CIO U.S. Commerce
    Department, Bureau of Economic Analysis)

8
The Oklahoma Experience
  • The state went from below-average job growth
    to first in the nation within months of
    implementing Right to Work.
  • Incomes Rise
  • Health Coverage Expands
  • Poverty Falls

9
Oklahoma Incomes Rise
  • Real household income increased by roughly
    1,500, while the national median fell by a
    little over 1,100.
  • Between 1990 and 2000, Oklahomas real household
    income relative to the national median fell by
    roughly 1,300. Since the enactment of the RTW
    law, the trend has reversed.
  • After RTW passage, Oklahoma experienced immediate
    1.4 real aggregate income growth. Real income
    growth in states with forced union dues was 0.9.

10
Oklahoma Health Coverage Expands
  • Between 2000 and 2004, the U.S. Census Bureau
    reports that the total number of Americans
    covered by private health insurance fell by 2.8
    million.
  • Opposite the national trend, those privately
    insured in Oklahoma increased by 5,000.

11
Oklahoma Poverty Falls
  • The poverty level for Oklahoma dropped a
    statistically significant 3.2 percent from
    2000-2001 to 2002-2003.
  • Nationwide, poverty rose 1.1 percent during
    the same time period.

12
At least one-third of businesses looking at
expansion sites Do Not Even Consider
non-Right-to-Work States.
13
  • ... A Right-to-Work law would make it much
    easier for me to do my job.
  • -Personal observation of Mickey Maurer,
  • former Indiana Secretary of Commerce

14
The Impact of RTW on Indianas Counties
  • The Beltway Effect
  • The statistical impact on borders
    between RTW non-RTW states

15
The Beltway Effect
  • An Allegheny Institute report shows a
    correlation between Right to Work states and
    beltway (or functional equivalent) data from
    the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.
  • Functional equivalents include a series of
    major arterial roads that facilitate commuting
    and surface transportation.

16
The Beltway Effect
17
The Beltway Effect
  • Relevant statistical difference
  • 35.5 compared to 1.1.
  • A beltway roadway plus RTW legislation is the
    preferred combination for advanced job growth.
  • Major Moves and continued highway, byway and
    infrastructure development also promote job
    growth.

18
The Border Effect
  • In non-RTW states, the percentage growth in
    manufacturing jobs decreases as you get closer to
    a neighboring RTW state.

From the Mackinac Center for Public
Policy www.mackinac.org
19
(No Transcript)
20
The Border Effect
21
The Border Effect
  • Job growth declines in a non-RTW state as
    distance decreases to the state boundary with a
    RTW state.
  • Job growth increases on the other side of the
    non-RTW/RTW state boundary.

22
The Border Effect
  • Every county in Indiana is within 75 miles of
    a non-Right-to-Work state.
  • All of Indiana will be positively affected by
    RTW legislation.

23
Beltways and Borders
  • This map depicts the combined effect of Right
    to Work legislation on long- term job growth.

24
Indianas Neighbors
  • "We must get Kentucky off the economic
    development no-call list."
  • former Gov. Ernie Fletcher
  • Kentucky is currently making a push to adopt RTW
    legislation.
  • Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin are considering the
    move to RTW legislation.

25
Right To WorkIts a Matter of Jobs.Its a
Matter of Fairness.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com