Foam Shells: Overcoating Progress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Foam Shells: Overcoating Progress

Description:

... spinning plates with one moving up and ... Failure occurred under the following different conditions: ... The density of polymer produced can vary with time. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: jest5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Foam Shells: Overcoating Progress


1
Foam Shells Overcoating Progress
  • High Average Power Laser Program Workshop
  • Lawrence Livermore National Lab
  • June 20-21, 2005
  • Jon Streit, Diana Schroen
  • Schafer Corporation

2
Shell Production Status
Nonconcentricity Many different methods of
agitation and devices have been used to produce
shells. Although NC has been reduced, we can not
yet produce batches of shells that consistently
meet specifications. We must take a step back,
look at what weve learned, and figure out how to
apply it. Overcoat We have had continued
problems with shrinkage of the PVP overcoat
during drying and are now concentrating on
alternative overcoat chemistries. We have also
begun to focus on solutions to possible problems
encountered during the shell exchange and drying
processes.



3
Reducing Nonconcentricity (NC)
  • What have we learned?
  • Density matching beyond a rough match has not had
    a clear effect on NC.
  • Shells need a minimum of 1 hour of agitation
    before gelation to produce low NC.
  • Shells produced with flow disruptions have lower
    NC. Flow disruptions cause deformations and may
    produce centering forces in the shell.
    Disruptions are very random which may result in a
    wide range of NCs within a batch.
  • Application of shear forces may help center the
  • shell core.
  • How might we apply what we have learned?

4
Concept to Cause Deformation Shear
  • These conceptual ideas would incorporate
    deformation and shear forces to reduce NC.

Two opposite spinning plates with one moving up
and down to deform shells.
Two opposite spinning plates with one with ridges
to deform shells.
5
Review of Overcoat Work
  • Poly(4-vinyl phenol) (PVP)
  • Shrinks upon drying
  • Smoothest coating tested
  • Diethylene Triamine (DET)
  • Does not shrink upon drying
  • Not as smooth as PVP
  • Melamine-Formaldehyde (MF)
  • Does not shrink upon drying
  • Almost as smooth as PVP
  • Too thin
  • Other chemistries attempted, but required more
    preliminary work

PVP 5000X
DET 5000X
MF 500X
6
Problems with PVP Coating
  • PVP appears to shrink during the final stage of
    the drying process
  • Coated and uncoated shells appear to be the same
    size in the CO2 dryer until the final venting
    stage.
  • Coated shells then shrink and the coating
    survives or the coating fails and the foam does
    not shrink.
  • Uncoated shells do not shrink to the degree of
    coated shells.
  • Failure occurred under the following different
    conditions
  • Solvent variation 4-chlorotoluene, diethyl
    phthalate, dibutyl phthalate
  • Exchanging into IPA, ethanol, or drying directly
    from diethyl phthalate.
  • With added crosslinkers such as tris(2-amino
    ethyl) amine, and diethylene triamine

7
Review of Interfacial Chemistry
  • Two solution are made one an aqueous solution
    with a water soluble reactant, the other an
    organic solution with an organic soluble
    reactant. An acid acceptor must be used in the
    aqueous phase as acid is a byproduct of the
    reaction.
  • Interfacial microencapsulation is widely used in
    industry especially in pesticides and
    pharmaceuticals.

8
Variables Affecting Polymer Formation
  • Different solvents can affect surface smoothness,
    strength, and thickness.
  • Using different oil soluble and water soluble
    reactants will obviously result in different
    polymers produced and can also determine the
    orientation of primary and secondary growth.
  • Using different acid acceptors (NaOH, Na2CO3, or
    excess diamine) can change the properties of the
    polymer.
  • Longer reaction time produces thicker coatings,
    but reactions tend to be self limiting. The
    density of polymer produced can vary with time.
  • Surfactants influence reactant transport which
    can lead to more robust polymers.

9
Results of Overcoat Screening
  • We have screened many pairs of interfacial
    reactants in a variety of solvents in test tubes.
    From this study we have selected the following
    combinations to attempt shell overcoat

Solvent Oil Reactant Aqueous Reactant
Dibutyl Phthalate Terephthaloyl Chloride 4,4 Biphenol (4,4), Poly(ethyleneimine) (PEI), PVP/PEI
1,2 Dichlorohexane Terephthaloyl Chloride 4,4
1,2 Dichlorohexane Isophthaloyl Dichloride Diethylene triamine, 4,4, Hexamethylene diamine HMD)
Tetrachloroethylene Isophthaloyl Dichloride PEI
Tetrachloroethylene Sebacoyl Chloride HMD
Tetrachloroethylene Toluene Diisocyanate PEI
Cyclohexane Sebacoyl Chloride PEI
10
Polymeric Reagents
  • ILE found that, In general, membranes obtained
    by the low-Mw, water-soluble reagents were
    fragile and unable to use as ICF targets.
    Polymeric water-soluble reagents formed an
    elastic, tough membrane, but a low density layer
    was often seen on the outer surface. J. Vac.
    Sci. Tech. A 11(5), Sep/Oct 1993.
  • In addition to the other reagents we have
    identified, we will also try overcoating with
    these polymeric reagents.

Polymeric Reagents used by ILE
Hydroxyethylcellulose
Methylcellulose
Poly(vinyl phenol)
Possible Polymeric Reagents
Poly(ethyleneimine)
Poly(allylamine)
Poly(4-aminostyrene)
Poly(N-methylvinylamine)
11
Current Availability vs. Future Possibilities
  • Possible
  • DVB Foam with Interfacial Coating
  • Solves
  • No Oxygen Content in Foam
  • Ease of Manufacture (less time, less cost)
  • Problems
  • Need to control shrinkage
  • Need to control cracking
  • Requires we identify proper reactants / conditions
  • Available
  • RF Foam Shell with Flash PVP Coating followed by
    GDP Coating
  • Solves
  • Permeation Barrier
  • Problems
  • High Oxygen Content
  • Extra Processing (more time, more cost)
  • Buckle Pressure

12
Some Solutions to Overcoat Problems
  • If osmotic pressure becomes a problem we can try
    other dual solvents such as tetrahydrofuran or
    dioxane.
  • We will try using supercritical nitrous oxide
    during the drying step to allow us to skip the
    foam dehydration step altogether.
  • We are considering working with Southwest
    Research Institute a major research company that
    has experience developing proof-of-concept
    industrial mass production microencapsulation
    processes including interfacial chemistry.

Exchange Fluid Critical Temp (ºC) Critical Pressure (psi) Water Solubility
Carbon Dioxide 31 1072 Very Low
Nitrous Oxide 37 1054 High
13
Summary
  • Build and test device that incorporates both
    shell deformation and shear forces to try to
    reduce NC.
  • Continue to investigate interfacial overcoating
    chemistries that will adhere to the shell and
    meet smoothness specifications.
  • Overcoat shells with best polymer results from
    overcoat screening in vial.
  • Overcoat shells with polymeric reactants.
  • Pick the smoothest overcoats and vary drying and
    exchange solvents to solve cracking issues.
  • The potential savings and ease of production
    require that we continue to explore interfacial
    overcoats as a permeation barrier.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com