Modelling Two Host Strains with an Indirectly Transmitted Pathogen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Modelling Two Host Strains with an Indirectly Transmitted Pathogen

Description:

Discuss the differences between two models. Equilibrium solutions, feasibility and stability. ... Future Work. n-strain models. Investigating cycles. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: agia9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modelling Two Host Strains with an Indirectly Transmitted Pathogen


1
Modelling Two Host Strains with an Indirectly
Transmitted Pathogen
  • Angela Giafis
  • 20th April 2005

2
Motivation
  1. Disease can be spread by contact with infectious
    materials (free stages) in the environment.
  2. Interested in what happens when 2 different host
    types, one more susceptible to infection the
    other more resistant, are subjected to such an
    infection.

3
Structure
  • Discuss the differences between two models.
  • Equilibrium solutions, feasibility and stability.
  • Show parameter plots.
  • Look at some dynamical illustrations.

4
Models
Model 1
Model 2
5
  • Both models have demography (births and deaths)
    and infection but as we see there are details
    that differ and this turns out to matter.
  • Much of the behaviour of model 1 is governed by
    the term D0 which is the basic depression ratio,
    where

6
Equilibrium Solutions and Feasibility Model 1
  • Total extinction (0,0,0,0,0,0)
  • Uninfected coexistence (S1,0,0,K-S1,0,0)
  • with S1 ? 0,K
  • Strain 1 alone with the pathogen (S1,Î1,W1,0,0,0)
  • Strain 2 alone with the pathogen (0,0,0,S2,Î2,W2)
  1. Feasible
  2. Feasible
  3. Feasible if K gt HT,1
  4. Feasible if K gt HT,2

7
Equilibrium Solutions and Feasibility Model 2
  • Total extinction (0,0,0,0)
  • Strain 1 alone at its carrying capacity
    (K1,0,0,0)
  • Strain 2 alone at its carrying capacity
    (0,K2,0,0)
  • Strain 1 alone with the pathogen (S1,0,Î1,W1)
  • Strain 2 alone with the pathogen (0,S2,Î2,W2)
  • Coexistence of the strains and the pathogen
    (S1,S2,I,W)
  • Feasible
  • Feasible
  • Feasible
  • Feasible if K1 gt HT,1
  • Feasible if K2 gt HT,2
  • Feasible if q1?2-q2?1 lt 0 and HT,1ltK12ltHT,2

8
Stability Model 1
  1. (0,0,0,0,0,0) is unstable
  2. (S1,0,0,K-S1,0,0) is neutrally stable iff
    (K-S1)/HT,2S1/HT,1lt1 and given feasibility.
    For point stability we need ABC-C2-A2Dgt0, if
    ABC-C2-A2Dlt0 we expect limit cycles.
  3. (S1,Î1,W1,0,0,0) is stable iff D0,1ltD0,2 and
    given feasibility. For point stability we need
    A1B1-C1gt0, if A1B1-C1lt0 we expect limit cycles.
  4. (0,0,0,S2,Î2,W2) is stable iff D0,2ltD0,1 and
    given feasibility. For point stability we need
    A2B2-C2gt0, if A2B2-C2lt0 we expect limit cycles.

9
Stability Model 2
  1. (0,0,0,0) is unstable
  2. (K1,0,0,0) is stable iff K1ltHT,1
  3. (0,K2,0,0) is unstable
  4. (S1,0,Î1,W1) is stable iff HT,1gtK12 and given
    feasibility. For point stability we need
    A1B1-C1gt0, if A1B1-C1lt0 we expect limit cycles.
  5. (0,S2,Î2,W2) is stable iff K12gtHT,2 and given
    feasibility. For point stability we need
    A2B2-C2gt0, if A2B2-C2lt0 we expect limit cycles.
  6. (S1,S2,I,W) is stable given feasibility. For
    point stability we need ABC-C2-A2Dgt0, if
    ABC-C2-A2Dlt0 we expect limit cycles.

10
Parameter Plots
  • Trade-off individual hosts pay for their
    increased resistance to the pathogen by a
    reduction in the contribution to the overall
    fitness.
  • Our parameter plots are representative of our
    stability conditions.
  • The susceptible strain (strain 1) values are
    fixed and we will vary two of the resistant
    strain (strain 2) parameters.

11
Parameter Plots Model 1A) Susceptible strain
point stable
12
Parameter Plots Model 1B) Susceptible strain
cyclic stable
13
Parameter Plots Model 2A) Susceptible strain
point stable
14
Parameter Plots Model 2B) Susceptible strain
cyclic stable
15
Dynamical Illustrations Model 1B
Region A
Region B
16
Region D
Region C
Region D
17
Region F
Region E
Region F
Region F
18
Region B
Region A
Region C
19
Region D
Region D
20
Dynamical Illustrations 2B
Region B
Region A
21
Region C
Region C
22
Region B
Region A
Region B
23
Region C
Region C
24
Summary
  • In both models we considered two cases, one where
    the more susceptible strain is point stable
    (A1B1-C1gt0) and one where we expect to see limit
    cycles (A1B1-C1lt0).
  • Model 1 coexistence not possible.
  • Model 2 coexistence possible. Indeed cyclic
    coexistence of all the populations is possible.
  • Outcome depends on balance between costs and
    benefits.

25
Future Work
  • n-strain models.
  • Investigating cycles.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com