Components of a Successful AREA R15 Grant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Components of a Successful AREA R15 Grant

Description:

Writing for Step One of Peer Review Process ... Lists eligible institutions. Provides email addresses for AREA Program Contact Persons ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: rebeccaj153
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Components of a Successful AREA R15 Grant


1
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant
  • Rebecca J. Sommer
  • Bates College

2
Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA)
Program (R15), NIH
  • Funds small-scale, health-related research
    projects at institutions that are not major
    recipients of NIH funding
  • Major goal is to expose undergraduate students to
    meritorious biomedical and behavioral research
  • 25 - 31 of proposals funded in 2004-2007

3
http//grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/area.htm
4
Recovery Act-Funded AREA Request for Applications
(RFA-OD-09-007)
  • Single submission, due September 24, 2009
  • Increases total funding to 300,000 direct costs
  • Extends eligibility to Institutions receiving
    less than 6 million dollars annual NIH funds
  • NIH plans to make the increases permanent by the
    next standard due date (October 25, 2009)

5
Factors Key to Success
  • Important research question
  • Focused and organized proposal
  • Demonstration of expertise
  • Positive impact on research activity of
    undergraduates and PI

6
Important Research Question
  • Meritorious research project
  • Collaboration not competition
  • Can be a new area of research

7
Focused and Organized Proposal
  • Focused and organized at the level of both the
    writing style and research approach
  • Two-four closely related Specific Aims are
    appropriate

8
Demonstration of Expertise
  • More flexibility in judging potential for success
    (more than publication record and preliminary
    data)
  • Include letters of support
  • Provide convincing Methods and Alternative
    Approaches
  • Perhaps include a collaborator

9
Positive Impact AREA Grant Statement
  • PI experience in supervising undergraduate
    student research
  • Suitability and enhancement of research
    environment
  • Availability of well-qualified students
  • Evidence of Institutional support
  • Supports release/leave time

10
A Few Nuts and Bolts
  • On-line submission
  • register in grants.gov and eRA Commons
  • Signing Official needs to submit the application
  • be prepared to meet other in-house requirements
  • Modular vs. detailed budget
  • modular budgets are more flexible but limited to
    total of 250,000 direct costs

11
Get to Know AREA Program Contact Person and
Institute Program Officer
  • Dont hesitate to email/call your AREA Contact
    Person for guidance
  • find most appropriate Institute, Scientific
    Review Group (SRG) and particular study section
  • NIH Institute or Center (IC)
  • get a measure of the ICs commitment/enthusiasm
    for AREA proposals and your project in particular
  • after review, the IC Program Officer becomes your
    main point of contact

12
Peer Review is a Two-Step Process
  • Center for Scientific Review
  • Integrated Review Groups, each is made up of
    several different study sections
  • provides comments and funding priority score
  • NIH Institute or Center (IC)
  • Advisory Council or Board, makes funding
    decisions based on the review and the goals of
    the IC
  • IC Program Officer can pull a proposal up

13
Writing for Step One of Peer Review Process
  • Find and request the best Integrated Review Group
    and study section for your proposal
  • http//cms.csr.nih.gov/peerreviewmeetings/csrirgde
    scriptionnew/
  • Write to your audience
  • know the members of your probable study section
  • read the Guidelines for Reviewers
  • http//cms.csr.nih.gov/PeerReviewMeetings/Reviewer
    Guidelines/

14
CSR Review Criteria
  • Significance
  • Investigator(s)
  • Innovation
  • Approach
  • Environment
  • Additional Review Criteria (Protections for Human
    Subjects, Resubmission, Renewal...)

15
Outcome of Step One of Peer Review Process
  • Five individual core criteria scores and overall
    impact/priority score
  • Summary Statements
  • reviewer critiques and summary of discussion
  • Streamlining
  • less competitive applications are not discussed
    or given a priority score at study section
    meetings, still receive the written critiques and
    criteria scores submitted by assigned reviewers

16
Dont Get Discouraged
  • It usually takes more than one submission!
  • Use comments to revise and resubmit
  • Standard AREA submission deadlines are February
    25, June 25 and October 25.

17
AREA (R15) Program Website
  • http/grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/area.htm
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section
  • Lists eligible institutions
  • Provides email addresses for AREA Program Contact
    Persons
  • Describes NIH Institutes and Center objectives
  • Links to Peer Review Information

18
  • Thank you!
  • You can contact me at rsommer_at_bates.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com