Title: Update on Antiplatelets
1Update on Anti-platelets
- Gabriel A. Vidal, MD
- Vascular Neurology
- Ochsner Medical Center
- October 14th, 2009
2Primary Stroke Prevention
3Primary Vascular Disease PreventionPrimary
Prevention Trials Meta-AnalysisLancet 2009
3731849-60
- Meta-analysis for serious vascular events
- MI, CI, VD
- Major bleeding
- 6 primary prevention trials 95,000 individuals
- Aspirin trials
- 12 reduction in vascular events
- Statistically significant
- MI reduced 1/5
- No effect on stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, vascular
death - Effect similar for men and women
4Primary Vascular Disease PreventionPrimary
Prevention Trials Meta-AnalysisLancet 2009
3731849-60
5Primary Vascular Disease PreventionPrimary
Prevention Trials Meta-AnalysisLancet 2009
3731849-60
6Secondary Stroke Prevention
7Clinical Trials
- CAST - Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (1997)
- Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 21,106
patients - 10,554 patients were randomized to receive
aspirin (160 mg/day) and 10,552 received placebo - Significant (14) reduction in mortality and
fewer recurrent ischemic strokes in patients
receiving aspirin during treatment period - At discharge, 11.4 fewer patients per 1000 were
dead or dependent in the group receiving aspirin - IST - International Stroke Trial (1997)
- Randomized, open trial involving 19435 patients
- Half of the participating patients received
unfractionated heparin and half were told to
avoid heparin - In a factorial design, half received aspirin 300
mg daily and half were told to avoid aspirin - No statistically significant difference in death
at 14 days, or death or dependence at 6 months
between patients receiving heparin vs. no heparin - Statistically significant difference in the
number of deaths and recurrent strokes between
patients receiving aspirin vs. no aspirin - Taken together, CAST and IST show reliably that
aspirin started early in hospital produces a
small but definite net benefit - About 9 fewer deaths or non-fatal strokes per
1000 in the first few weeks - About 13 fewer dead or dependent per 1000 after
some weeks or months of follow-up
8Clinical Trials
- ESPS2 European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (1996)
- Patients were randomized to participate in 1 of 4
groups - 24-month stroke rate (Statistically significant)
- 12.9 in the aspirin-alone group (18 risk
reduction) - 12.2 in the dipyridamole-alone group (16 risk
reduction) - 9.9 in the combination group (37 risk
reduction vs placebo 23 vs. ASA) - 15.8 in the placebo group
- No significant difference among the groups for
the endpoint of death - ESPIRIT - European / Australasian Stroke
Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (2006) - Anticoagulants versus aspirin comparison of
ESPRIT - Prematurely ended because ESPRIT reported that
the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole was
more effective than aspirin alone - Primary outcome events arose in 13 patients on
combination treatment vs. 16 on aspirin alone - Hazard ratio for the primary outcome event
comparing anticoagulants with the combination
treatment of aspirin and dipyridamole was 1.31,
for ischemic events was 0.73 and for major
bleeding complications 2.56 - Patients on the combination of aspirin and
dipyridamole discontinued trial medication more
often than those on aspirin alone, mainly because
of headache
9Antiplatelet Agents in StrokeESPS II
10ESPIRITPrimary outcome nonfatal CI, MI,
vascular death, major bleedingLancet, 2006
11Aspirin DipyridamoleMeta-analysisVerro,
Stroke, 2008
- Non-fatal stroke endpoint
- Composite endpoint of nonfatal CI, MI, or
vascular death
12Aspirin DipyridamoleMeta-analysis Non-fatal
stroke endpointImmediate Release VS Extended
Release (Verro, Stroke, 2008)
13Clinical Trials
- WARSS Warfarin vs Aspirin Recurrent Stroke
Study (2001) - Randomized to receive either aspirin (325 mg/day)
or warfarin (INR 1.4-2.8) for at least two years - Primary end point of death or recurrent ischemic
stroke was reached by 17.8 of patients assigned
to warfarin and 16 of those assigned to aspirin - Rates of major hemorrhage were low (2.22 per 100
patient-years in the warfarin group and 1.49 in
the aspirin group) - There were no statistical differences in primary
or secondary endpoints or in major hemorrhage - WASID Warfarin vs Aspirin Symptomatic
Intracranial Disease (2005) - Randomized to receive either aspirin 1300 mg/day
or warfarin, titrated to an INR of 2 - 3 - There was 4.3 rate of death in the aspirin group
and a 9.7 rate in the warfarin group - There was a 3.2 rate of major hemorrhage in the
aspirin group and a 8.3 rate in the warfarin
group - The primary end point occurred in 22.1 percent of
the patients in the aspirin group and 21.8
percent of those in the warfarin group
14WARSS
15WARSS
16WASID
17WASID
18WASID
19Clinical Trials
- CAPRIE Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Patients at
Risk for Ischaemic Events (1996) - Randomized double dummy Clopidogrel 75 mg vs
Aspirin 325 mg - Patients treated with clopidogrel had a 5.32
annual risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial
infarction or vascular death vs 5.83 in patients
treated with aspirin - Statistically significant relative-risk reduction
of 8.7 in favor of clopidogrel - MATCH Management of ATherothrombosis with
Clopidogrel in High-risk patients with recent TIA
or ischemic stroke (2004) - Randomized to Clopidogrel ASA or Clopidogrel
placebo - Compared to clopidogrel, combination with ASA had
no significant effect on recurrent ischemic
events - 15.7 of patients taking combination had a
further ischemic event vs 16.73 of patients
taking clopidogrel placebo - Patients taking clopidogrel ASA also had
significantly more life-threatening hemorrhage vs
patients taking clopidogrel placebo - CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic
Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management and
Avoidance (2006) - Randomized to receive either clopidogrel or
placebo, in combination with aspirin - Clopidogrel plus aspirin was not significantly
more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the
rate of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death
from cardiovascular causes
20CAPRIE
21CAPRIE
22CAPRIE
23MATCH
24MATCH
25CHARISMA
26CHARISMA
27Clinical Trials
- PRoFESS Prevention Regimen For Effectively
avoiding Second Strokes (2008) - 18,500 patients will be randomized to receive
active antiplatelet medication, either
clopidogrel or extended-release dipyridamole and
aspirin - Primary Outcome Time to first recurrent stroke
- Recurrent strokes occurred in 9 patients
randomly assigned to ASA with ER-DP and 9
patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel - mRS scores were not statistically different in
patients with recurrent stroke who were treated
with ASA and ER-DP versus clopidogrel - There was no significant difference in the
proportion of patients with recurrent stroke with
a good outcome, as measured with the Barthel
index, across all treatment groups - There is no evidence that either of the two
treatments was superior to the other in the
prevention of recurrent stroke
28PRoFESS
29PRoFESS
30(No Transcript)