Update on Antiplatelets - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Update on Antiplatelets

Description:

Clinical Trials. ESPS2 European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (1996) ... Clinical Trials. CAPRIE Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Patients at Risk for Ischaemic Events (1996) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: OCF4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Update on Antiplatelets


1
Update on Anti-platelets
  • Gabriel A. Vidal, MD
  • Vascular Neurology
  • Ochsner Medical Center
  • October 14th, 2009

2
Primary Stroke Prevention
3
Primary Vascular Disease PreventionPrimary
Prevention Trials Meta-AnalysisLancet 2009
3731849-60
  • Meta-analysis for serious vascular events
  • MI, CI, VD
  • Major bleeding
  • 6 primary prevention trials 95,000 individuals
  • Aspirin trials
  • 12 reduction in vascular events
  • Statistically significant
  • MI reduced 1/5
  • No effect on stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, vascular
    death
  • Effect similar for men and women

4
Primary Vascular Disease PreventionPrimary
Prevention Trials Meta-AnalysisLancet 2009
3731849-60
5
Primary Vascular Disease PreventionPrimary
Prevention Trials Meta-AnalysisLancet 2009
3731849-60
6
Secondary Stroke Prevention
7
Clinical Trials
  • CAST - Chinese Acute Stroke Trial (1997)
  • Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 21,106
    patients
  • 10,554 patients were randomized to receive
    aspirin (160 mg/day) and 10,552 received placebo
  • Significant (14) reduction in mortality and
    fewer recurrent ischemic strokes in patients
    receiving aspirin during treatment period
  • At discharge, 11.4 fewer patients per 1000 were
    dead or dependent in the group receiving aspirin
  • IST - International Stroke Trial (1997)
  • Randomized, open trial involving 19435 patients
  • Half of the participating patients received
    unfractionated heparin and half were told to
    avoid heparin
  • In a factorial design, half received aspirin 300
    mg daily and half were told to avoid aspirin
  • No statistically significant difference in death
    at 14 days, or death or dependence at 6 months
    between patients receiving heparin vs. no heparin
  • Statistically significant difference in the
    number of deaths and recurrent strokes between
    patients receiving aspirin vs. no aspirin
  • Taken together, CAST and IST show reliably that
    aspirin started early in hospital produces a
    small but definite net benefit
  • About 9 fewer deaths or non-fatal strokes per
    1000 in the first few weeks
  • About 13 fewer dead or dependent per 1000 after
    some weeks or months of follow-up

8
Clinical Trials
  • ESPS2 European Stroke Prevention Study 2 (1996)
  • Patients were randomized to participate in 1 of 4
    groups
  • 24-month stroke rate (Statistically significant)
  • 12.9 in the aspirin-alone group (18 risk
    reduction)
  • 12.2 in the dipyridamole-alone group (16 risk
    reduction)
  • 9.9 in the combination group (37 risk
    reduction vs placebo 23 vs. ASA)
  • 15.8 in the placebo group
  • No significant difference among the groups for
    the endpoint of death
  • ESPIRIT - European / Australasian Stroke
    Prevention in Reversible Ischemia Trial (2006)
  • Anticoagulants versus aspirin comparison of
    ESPRIT
  • Prematurely ended because ESPRIT reported that
    the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole was
    more effective than aspirin alone
  • Primary outcome events arose in 13 patients on
    combination treatment vs. 16 on aspirin alone
  • Hazard ratio for the primary outcome event
    comparing anticoagulants with the combination
    treatment of aspirin and dipyridamole was 1.31,
    for ischemic events was 0.73 and for major
    bleeding complications 2.56
  • Patients on the combination of aspirin and
    dipyridamole discontinued trial medication more
    often than those on aspirin alone, mainly because
    of headache

9
Antiplatelet Agents in StrokeESPS II
10
ESPIRITPrimary outcome nonfatal CI, MI,
vascular death, major bleedingLancet, 2006
11
Aspirin DipyridamoleMeta-analysisVerro,
Stroke, 2008
  • Non-fatal stroke endpoint
  • Composite endpoint of nonfatal CI, MI, or
    vascular death

12
Aspirin DipyridamoleMeta-analysis Non-fatal
stroke endpointImmediate Release VS Extended
Release (Verro, Stroke, 2008)
  • Immediate release trials
  • Extended release trials

13
Clinical Trials
  • WARSS Warfarin vs Aspirin Recurrent Stroke
    Study (2001)
  • Randomized to receive either aspirin (325 mg/day)
    or warfarin (INR 1.4-2.8) for at least two years
  • Primary end point of death or recurrent ischemic
    stroke was reached by 17.8 of patients assigned
    to warfarin and 16 of those assigned to aspirin
  • Rates of major hemorrhage were low (2.22 per 100
    patient-years in the warfarin group and 1.49 in
    the aspirin group)
  • There were no statistical differences in primary
    or secondary endpoints or in major hemorrhage
  • WASID Warfarin vs Aspirin Symptomatic
    Intracranial Disease (2005)
  • Randomized to receive either aspirin 1300 mg/day
    or warfarin, titrated to an INR of 2 - 3
  • There was 4.3 rate of death in the aspirin group
    and a 9.7 rate in the warfarin group
  • There was a 3.2 rate of major hemorrhage in the
    aspirin group and a 8.3 rate in the warfarin
    group
  • The primary end point occurred in 22.1 percent of
    the patients in the aspirin group and 21.8
    percent of those in the warfarin group

14
WARSS
15
WARSS
16
WASID
17
WASID
18
WASID
19
Clinical Trials
  • CAPRIE Clopidogrel vs Aspirin in Patients at
    Risk for Ischaemic Events (1996)
  • Randomized double dummy Clopidogrel 75 mg vs
    Aspirin 325 mg
  • Patients treated with clopidogrel had a 5.32
    annual risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial
    infarction or vascular death vs 5.83 in patients
    treated with aspirin
  • Statistically significant relative-risk reduction
    of 8.7 in favor of clopidogrel
  • MATCH Management of ATherothrombosis with
    Clopidogrel in High-risk patients with recent TIA
    or ischemic stroke (2004)
  • Randomized to Clopidogrel ASA or Clopidogrel
    placebo
  • Compared to clopidogrel, combination with ASA had
    no significant effect on recurrent ischemic
    events
  • 15.7 of patients taking combination had a
    further ischemic event vs 16.73 of patients
    taking clopidogrel placebo
  • Patients taking clopidogrel ASA also had
    significantly more life-threatening hemorrhage vs
    patients taking clopidogrel placebo
  • CHARISMA Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic
    Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management and
    Avoidance (2006)
  • Randomized to receive either clopidogrel or
    placebo, in combination with aspirin
  • Clopidogrel plus aspirin was not significantly
    more effective than aspirin alone in reducing the
    rate of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death
    from cardiovascular causes

20
CAPRIE
21
CAPRIE
22
CAPRIE
23
MATCH
24
MATCH
25
CHARISMA
26
CHARISMA
27
Clinical Trials
  • PRoFESS Prevention Regimen For Effectively
    avoiding Second Strokes (2008)
  • 18,500 patients will be randomized to receive
    active antiplatelet medication, either
    clopidogrel or extended-release dipyridamole and
    aspirin
  • Primary Outcome Time to first recurrent stroke
  • Recurrent strokes occurred in 9 patients
    randomly assigned to ASA with ER-DP and 9
    patients randomly assigned to clopidogrel
  • mRS scores were not statistically different in
    patients with recurrent stroke who were treated
    with ASA and ER-DP versus clopidogrel
  • There was no significant difference in the
    proportion of patients with recurrent stroke with
    a good outcome, as measured with the Barthel
    index, across all treatment groups
  • There is no evidence that either of the two
    treatments was superior to the other in the
    prevention of recurrent stroke

28
PRoFESS
29
PRoFESS
30
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com