Chevron Floating Roof Support - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Chevron Floating Roof Support

Description:

The Euler buckling mode of a floating roof leg determines its strength. ... Local buckling or collapse of legs can be sustained by most floating roofs if ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: kener
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chevron Floating Roof Support


1
Chevron Floating Roof Support
  • Providing Safe Working Conditions Under Floating
    Roofs

2
Types of Roof Collapse
  • Roof Spiral
  • this will result in the entire roof coming down
  • the strength and condition of the legs have no
    effect on this type of collapse
  • this is the most dangerous collapse mode
  • Vertical Collapse
  • will not result in complete roof collapse unless
    this initiates spiral mode above
  • typically will result in excessive distortion in
    a local area not complete collapse to the tank
    bottom

3
Sources Of Complete Roof Collapse
  • Roof Spiral
  • Roof anti-rotation device may not exist or may
    fail.
  • Lateral support provided by a modern rim seal is
    adequate to resist lateral movement. If the seal
    is removed without adding temporary lateral
    restraint, the roof can move laterally. The
    lateral movement alone is not usually enough to
    cause problems beyond local leg failures.
    However, it may initial rotational movement which
    is almost always the source of complete roof
    collapse.

4
Sources of Local Leg Failures
  • Vertical Collapse
  • The flexibility of most floating roofs allow them
    to withstand local leg failures without total
    collapse of the roof.
  • Landing floating roofs which are holding water or
    product on the deck is the most common source of
    leg failure.
  • A properly landed roof with corroded or damaged
    legs is also susceptible to collapse.

5
Prevention of Roof Spiraling
  • Prevent Rotational Movement
  • The Euler buckling mode of a floating roof leg
    determines its strength. Without restraint to
    movement at the deck, the allowable load of the
    leg is greatly decreased regardless of its
    condition or size.
  • The forces required to prevent rotation are not
    excessive. Once the roof begins to rotate the
    loading on back up systems are much harder to
    quantify and design for. Properly engineered
    systems can insure the spiral mode is avoided.
  • Prevent Lateral Movement
  • Lateral movement can be easily controlled by
    blocking the rim. This limits potential movement
    of the roof to maintain stability.

6
Prevention of Vertical Roof Collapse
  • Be sure roof is not landed with water or product
    on the deck.
  • Open the deck emergency drain to insure the
    landed roof does not accumulate water.
  • Inspect corrosion of legs and leg sleeves.
  • Inspect plumness and alignment of legs.

7
Industry Standard Roof Support
  • Insure rotational and lateral roof support.
  • Unloaded roofs will not completely collapse when
    properly restrained against rotation or lateral
    movement.
  • The restraint must be in good working order. If
    this cannot be verified, backup anti-rotation
    shall be used.
  • Rim seals which are removed shall be replaced by
    rim blocks or other lateral restraints.
  • Inspect the condition of each leg.
  • Test leg thickness. UT or use a hammer test.
  • Verify plumbness and proper landing of legs.
    Insure legs are not under designed.
  • Prevent loads from developing on the roof deck.
  • Provide temporary support to questionable legs.

8
Summary
  • Floating roof supports are designed very similar
    to fixed roof columns. Fixed roof collapse is
    virtually non-existent because the fixed roofs
    attachment to the shell limits any movement at
    the top of the columns. If floating roofs are
    similarly restrained against this movement they
    will be highly reliable.
  • Local buckling or collapse of legs can be
    sustained by most floating roofs if
    anti-rotations and lateral support is present.
    Legs which are susceptible to local collapse can
    easily be identified for corrective action.
    Landed roofs should never be holding water or
    product on the deck.
  • Back up systems should directly address the
    sources of collapse. Systems which are designed
    to support the roof after a failure mode is
    initiated are difficult to design as the loading
    during this failure cannot be easily predicted.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com