Section 4'4 Indeterminate Forms and LHospitals Rule - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 51
About This Presentation
Title:

Section 4'4 Indeterminate Forms and LHospitals Rule

Description:

In fact, although the limit in Expression 1 exists, its value is not obvious ... There is a struggle between the two. If the numerator wins, the limit will be ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:368
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 52
Provided by: CA5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Section 4'4 Indeterminate Forms and LHospitals Rule


1
Applications of Differentiation
Section 4.4Indeterminate Forms and LHospitals
Rule
2
Indeterminate Forms
  • Suppose we are trying to analyze the behavior of
    the function
  • Although F is not defined when x 1, we need to
    know how F behaves near 1.

3
Indeterminate Forms
  • In particular, we would like to know the value of
    the limit

Expression 1
4
Indeterminate Forms
  • In computing this limit, we can not apply Law 5
    of limits (Section 2.3) because the limit of the
    denominator is 0.
  • In fact, although the limit in Expression 1
    exists, its value is not obvious because both
    numerator and denominator approach 0 and is
    not defined.

5
Indeterminate Form Type 0/0
  • In general, if we have a limit of the form
  • where both f(x) ? 0 and g(x) ? 0 as x ? a, then
    this limit may or may not exist.
  • It is called an indeterminate form of type .
  • We met some limits of this type in Chapter 2.

6
Indeterminate Forms
  • For rational functions, we can cancel common
    factors

7
Indeterminate Forms
  • We can use a geometric argument to show that

8
Indeterminate Forms
  • However, these methods do not work for limits
    such as Expression 1.
  • Hence, in this section, we introduce a systematic
    method, known as lHospitals Rule, for the
    evaluation of indeterminate forms.

9
Indeterminate Forms
  • Another situation in which a limit is not obvious
    occurs when we look for a horizontal asymptote of
    F and need to evaluate the limit

Expression 2
10
Indeterminate Forms
  • It is not obvious how to evaluate this limit
    because both numerator and denominator become
    large as x ? 8.
  • There is a struggle between the two.
  • If the numerator wins, the limit will be 8.
  • If the denominator wins, the answer will be 0.
  • Alternatively, there may be some compromisethe
    answer may be some finite positive number.

11
Indeterminate Form Type 8/8
  • In general, if we have a limit of the form
  • where both f(x) ? 8 (or -8) and g(x) ? 8 (or
    -8), then the limit may or may not exist.
  • It is called an indeterminate form of type 8/8.

12
Indeterminate Forms
  • We saw in Section 2.6 that this type of limit can
    be evaluated for certain functionsincluding
    rational functionsby dividing the numerator and
    denominator by the highest power of x that occurs
    in the denominator.
  • For instance,

13
Indeterminate Forms
  • This method, though, does not work for limits
    such as Expression 2,
  • However, LHospitals Rule also applies to this
    type of indeterminate form.

14
LHopitals Rule
  • Suppose f and g are differentiable and g(x) ? 0
    on an open interval I that contains a (except
    possibly at a).
  • Suppose
  • or that
  • In other words, we have an indeterminate form of
    type or 8/8.

15
LHopitals Rule
  • Then,
  • provided that the limit on the right exists (or
    is 8 or - 8).

16
Remark 1
  • LHospitals Rule says that the limit of a
    quotient of functions is equal to the limit of
    the quotient of their derivativesprovided that
    the given conditions are satisfied.
  • It is especially important to verify the
    conditions regarding the limits of f and g before
    using the rule.

17
Remark 2
  • The rule is also valid for one-sided limits and
    for limits at infinity or negative infinity.
  • That is, x ? a can be replaced by any of the
    symbols x ? a, x ? a-, x ? 8, or x ? - 8.

18
Remark 3
  • For the special case in which f(a) g(a) 0,
    f and g are continuous, and g(a) ? 0, it is
    easy to see why the rule is true.

19
Remark 3
  • In fact, using the alternative form of the
    definition of a derivative, we have

20
Remark 3
  • It is more difficult to prove the general version
    of lHospitals Rule.

21
LHopitals Rule - Example 1
  • Find
  • and
  • Thus, we can apply lHospitals Rule

22
LHopitals Rule - Example 2
  • Calculate
  • We have and
  • So, lHospitals Rule gives

23
LHopitals Rule - Example 2
  • As ex ? 8 and 2x ? 8 as x ? 8, the limit on the
    right side is also indeterminate.
  • However, a second application of lHospitals
    Rule gives

24
LHopitals Rule - Example 3
  • Calculate
  • As ln x ? 8 and as x ? 8,
    lHospitals Rule applies
  • Notice that the limit on the right side is now
    indeterminate of type .

25
LHopitals Rule - Example 3
  • However, instead of applying the rule a second
    time as we did in Example 2, we simplify the
    expression and see that a second application is
    unnecessary

26
LHopitals Rule - Example 4
  • Find
  • Noting that both tan x x ? 0 and x3 ? 0 as x ?
    0, we use lHospitals Rule

27
LHopitals Rule - Example 4
  • As the limit on the right side is still
    indeterminate of type , we apply the rule
    again

28
LHopitals Rule - Example 4
  • Since , we simplify the
    calculation by writing

29
LHopitals Rule - Example 4
  • We can evaluate this last limit either by using
    lHospitals Rule a third time or by writing tan
    x as (sin x)/(cos x) and making use of our
    knowledge of trigonometric limits.

30
LHopitals Rule - Example 5
  • Find
  • If we blindly attempted to use l-Hospitals rule,
    we would get

31
LHopitals Rule - Example 5
  • This is wrong.
  • Although the numerator sin x ? 0 as x ? p -,
    notice that the denominator (1 - cos x) does not
    approach 0.
  • So, the rule can not be applied here.

32
LHopitals Rule - Example 5
  • The required limit is, in fact, easy to find
    because the function is continuous at p and the
    denominator is nonzero there

33
LHopitals Rule
  • The example shows what can go wrong if you use
    the rule without thinking.
  • Other limits can be found using the rule, but are
    more easily found by other methods.
  • See Examples 3 and 5 in Section 2.3, Example 3 in
    Section 2.6, and the discussion at the beginning
    of the section.
  • So, when evaluating any limit, you should
    consider other methods before using lHospitals
    Rule.

34
Indeterminate Products
  • If and
    (or -8),
  • then it is not clear what the value of
    if any, will be.
  • There is a struggle between f and g.
  • If f wins, the answer will be 0.
  • If g wins, the answer will be 8 (or -8).
  • Alternatively, there may be a compromise where
    the answer is a finite nonzero number.

35
Indeterminate Form Type 0 . 8
  • This kind of limit is called an indeterminate
    form of type 0 . 8.
  • We can deal with it by writing the product fg as
    a quotient
  • This converts the given limit into an
    indeterminate form of type or 8/8, so that we
    can use lHospitals Rule.

36
Indeterminate Products Ex 6
  • Evaluate
  • The given limit is indeterminate because, as x ?
    0, the first factor (x) approaches 0, whereas
    the second factor (ln x) approaches -8.

37
Indeterminate Products Ex 6
  • Writing x 1/(1/x), we have 1/x ? 8 as
  • x ? 0.
  • So, lHospitals Rule gives

38
Indeterminate Products Remark
  • In solving the example, another possible option
    would have been to write
  • This gives an indeterminate form of the type 0/0.
  • However, if we apply lHospitals Rule, we get a
    more complicated expression than the one we
    started with.
  • In general, when we rewrite an indeterminate
    product, we choose the option that leads to the
    simpler limit.

39
Indeterminate Form Type 8 8
  • If and ,
    then
  • is called an indeterminate form of type 8 - 8.

40
Indeterminate Differences
  • Again, there is a contest between f and g.
  • Will the answer be 8 (f wins)?
  • Will it be - 8 (g wins)?
  • Will they compromise on a finite number?

41
Indeterminate Differences
  • To find out, we try to convert the difference
    into a quotient (for instance, by using a common
    denominator, rationalization, or factoring out a
    common factor) so that we have an indeterminate
    form of type or 8/8.

42
Indeterminate Differences Ex 7
  • Compute
  • First, notice that sec x ? 8 and tan x ? 8 as x ?
    (p/2)-.
  • So, the limit is indeterminate.

43
Indeterminate Differences Ex 7
  • Here, we use a common denominator
  • Note that the use of lHospitals Rule is
    justified because
  • 1 sin x ? 0 and cos x ? 0 as x ? (p/2)-.

44
Indeterminate Powers
  • Several indeterminate forms arise from

45
Indeterminate Powers
  • Each of these three cases can be treated in
    either of two ways.
  • Taking the natural logarithm
  • Writing the function as an exponential
  • In either method, we are led to the indeterminate
    product
  • g(x) ln f(x), which is of type 08.

46
Indeterminate Powers Ex 8
  • Calculate
  • First, notice that, as x ? 0, we have 1 sin 4x
    ? 1 and
  • cot x ? 8.
  • So, the given limit is indeterminate.

47
Indeterminate Powers Ex 8
  • Let y (1 sin 4x)cot x
  • Then, ln y ln(1 sin 4x)cot x
    cot x ln(1 sin 4x)

48
Indeterminate Powers Ex 8
  • So, lHospitals Rule gives

49
Indeterminate Powers Ex 8
  • So far, we have computed the limit of ln y.
  • However, what we want is the limit of y.
  • To find this, we use the fact that y eln y

50
Indeterminate Powers Ex 9
  • Find
  • Notice that this limit is indeterminate since 0x
    0 for any
  • x gt 0 but x0 1 for any x ? 0.

51
Indeterminate Powers Ex 9
  • We could proceed as in Example 8 or by writing
    the function as an exponential
  • xx (eln x)x ex ln x
  • In Example 6, we used lHospitals Rule to show
    that
  • Therefore,
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com