How Philosophy of Science Can Help Biomedical Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 54
About This Presentation
Title:

How Philosophy of Science Can Help Biomedical Research

Description:

How to Do Biology across the Genome? ... sequence of X chromosome in baker's yeast ... the FDA need to assess the evidentiary value of enormous volumes of data ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 55
Provided by: phis9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How Philosophy of Science Can Help Biomedical Research


1
How Philosophy of Science Can Help Biomedical
Research


Barry Smith http//ontology.buffalo.edu/smith
2
How to Do Biology across the Genome?
3
  • MKVSDRRKFEKANFDEFESALNNKNDLVHCPSITLFESIPTEVRSFYED
    EKSGLIKVVKFRTGAMDRKRSFEKVVISVMVGKNVKKFLTFVEDEPDFQG
    GPISKYLIPKKINLMVYTLFQVHTLKFNRKDYDTLSLFYLNRGYYNELSF
    RVLERCHEIASARPNDSSTMRTFTDFVSGAPIVRSLQKSTIRKYGYNLAP
    YMFLLLHVDELSIFSAYQASLPGEKKVDTERLKRDLCPRKPIEIKYFSQI
    CNDMMNKKDRLGDILHIILRACALNFGAGPRGGAGDEEDRSITNEEPIIP
    SVDEHGLKVCKLRSPNTPRRLRKTLDAVKALLVSSCACTARDLDIFDDNN
    GVAMWKWIKILYHEVAQETTLKDSYRITLVPSSDGISLLAFAGPQRNVYV
    DDTTRRIQLYTDYNKNGSSEPRLKTLDGLTSDYVFYFVTVLRQMQICALG
    NSYDAFNHDPWMDVVGFEDPNQVTNRDISRIVLYSYMFLNTAKGCLVEYA
    TFRQYMRELPKNAPQKLNFREMRQGLIALGRHCVGSRFETDLYESATSEL
    MANHSVQTGRNIYGVDFSLTSVSGTTATLLQERASERWIQWLGLESDYHC
    SFSSTRNAEDV

sequence of X chromosome in bakers yeast
4
  • MKVSDRRKFEKANFDEFESALNNKNDLVHCPSITLFESIPTEVRSFYED
    EKSGLIKVVKFRTGAMDRKRSFEKVVISVMVGKNVKKFLTFVEDEPDFQG
    GPIPSKYLIPKKINLMVYTLFQVHTLKFNRKDYDTLSLFYLNRGYYNELS
    FRVLERCHEIASARPNDSSTMRTFTDFVSGAPIVRSLQKSTIRKYGYNLA
    PYMFLLLHVDELSIFSAYQASLPGEKKVDTERLKRDLCPRKPIEIKYFSQ
    ICNDMMNKKDRLGDILHIILRACALNFGAGPRGGAGDEEDRSITNEEPII
    PSVDEHGLKVCKLRSPNTPRRLRKTLDAVKALLVSSCACTARDLDIFDDN
    NGVAMWKWIKILYHEVAQETTLKDSYRITLVPSSDGISLLAFAGPQRNVY
    VDDTTRRIQLYTDYNKNGSSEPRLKTLDGLTSDYVFYFVTVLRQMQICAL
    GNSYDAFNHDPWMDVVGFEDPNQVTNRDISRIVLYSYMFLNTAKGCLVEY
    ATFRQYMRELPKNAPQKLNFREMRQGLIALGRHCVGSRFETDLYESATSE
    LMANHSVQTGRNIYGVDSFSLTSVSGTTATLLQERASERWIQWLGLESDY
    HCSFSSTRNAEDVVAGEAASSNHHQKISRVTRKRPREPKSTNDILVAGQK
    LFGSSFEFRDLHQLRLCYEIYMADTPSVAVQAPPGYGKTELFHLPLIALA
    SKGDVEYVSFLFVPYTVLLANCMIRLGRRGCLNVAPVRNFIEEGYDGVTD
    LYVGIYDDLASTNFTDRIAAWENIVECTFRTNNVKLGYLIVDEFHNFETE
    VYRQSQFGGITNLDFDAFEKAIFLSGTAPEAVADAALQRIGLTGLAKKSM
    DINELKRSEDLSRGLSSYPTRMFNLIKEKSEVPLGHVHKIRKKVESQPEE
    ALKLLLALFESEPESKAIVVASTTNEVEELACSWRKYFRVVWIHGKLGAA
    EKVSRTKEFVTDGSMQVLIGTKLVTEGIDIKQLMMVIMLDNRLNIIELIQ
    GVGRLRDGGLCYLLSRKNSWAARNRKGELPPKEGCITEQVREFYGLESKK
    GKKGQHVGCCGSRTDLSADTVELIERMDRLAEKQATASMSIVALPSSFQE
    SNSSDRYRKYCSSDEDSNTCIHGSANASTNASTNAITTASTNVRTNATTN
    ASTNATTNASTNASTNATTNASTNATTNSSTNATTTASTNVRTSATTTAS
    INVRTSATTTESTNSSTNATTTESTNSSTNATTTESTNSNTSATTTASIN
    VRTSATTTESTNSSTSATTTASINVRTSATTTKSINSSTNATTTESTNSN
    TNATTTESTNSSTNATTTESTNSSTNATTTESTNSNTSAATTESTNSNTS
    ATTTESTNASAKEDANKDGNAEDNRFHPVTDINKESYKRKGSQMVLLERK
    KLKAQFPNTSENMNVLQFLGFRSDEIKHLFLYGIDIYFCPEGVFTQYGLC
    KGCQKMFELCVCWAGQKVSYRRIAWEALAVERMLRNDEEYKEYLEDIEPY
    HGDPVGYLKYFSVKRREIYSQIQRNYAWYLAITRRRETISVLDSTRGKQG
    SQVFRMSGRQIKELYFKVWSNLRESKTEVLQYFLNWDEKKCQEEWEAKDD
    TVVVEALEKGGVFQRLRSMTSAGLQGPQYVKLQFSRHHRQLRSRYELSLG
    MHLRDQIALGVTPSKVPHWTAFLSMLIGLFYNKTFRQKLEYLLEQISEVW
    LLPHWLDLANVEVLAADDTRVPLYMLMVAVHKELDSDDVPDGRFDILLCR
    DSSREVGE

5
(No Transcript)
6
Stelzl et al., Cell, 2005
7
network of gene interactions in E. coli
http//moebio.com/santiago/gnom/ingles.html
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
what cellular component?
what molecular function?
what biological process?
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
The Idea of Common Controlled Vocabularies
GlyProt
MouseEcotope
sphingolipid transporter activity
DiabetInGene
GluChem
14
The Idea of Common Controlled Vocabularies
GlyProt
MouseEcotope
Holliday junction helicase complex
DiabetInGene
GluChem
15
Gene Ontology
  • male courtship behavior, orientation prior to
    leg tapping and wing vibration

16
Benefits of GO
  • based in biological science
  • links data to biological reality
  • links people to software
  • links data together
  • across species (human, mouse, yeast, fly ...)
  • across granularities (molecule, cell, organ,
    organism, population)

17
The goal
  • all biological (biomedical) research data should
    cumulate to form a single, algorithmically
    processible, whole
  • http//obofoundry.org

18
Ontologies already being applied to achieve this
goal
  • Sjöblöm T, et al. analyzed 13,023 genes in 11
    breast and 11 colorectal cancers
  • GO tells you what is standard functional
    information for these genes
  • By tracking deviations from this standard 189
    genes could be identified as being mutated at
    significant frequency and thus as providing
    targets for diagnostic and therapeutic
    intervention.
  • Science. 2006 Oct 13314(5797)268-74.

19
Towards Empirical Philosophy
  • processualist vs. 3-dimensionalist
  • reductionist vs. non-reductionist
  • realist vs. nominalist
  • If ontologies based on different philosophical
    principles are tested for their utility in
    support of scientific research, which types of
    ontologies will prove most useful?

20
  • Some sample ontologies
  • Cell Ontology (CL)
  • Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA)
  • Environment Ontology (EnvO)
  • Gene Ontology (GO)
  • Infectious Disease Ontology
  • Phenotypic Quality Ontology (PaTO)
  • Protein Ontology (PRO)
  • RNA Ontology (RnaO)
  • Sequence Ontology (SO)

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
The problem
  • High throughput experimentation data is
    meaningless unless the researcher is provided
    with detailed information concerning how it was
    obtained

26
  • To make experimental data computationally
    accessible we need ontologies to describe the
    data
  • (1) from the point of view of their relation to
    reality
  • (2) from the point of view of their relation to
    experiments

27
Three solutions
  • The MGED Ontology
  • OBI The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations
  • EXPO The Experiment Ontology

28
MGED (Microarray Gene Expression Data) Ontology
29
MGED Ontology
  • Individual def. name of the individual organism
    from which the biomaterial was derived
  • Experiment def. The complete set of bioassays
    and their descriptions performed as an experiment
    for a common purpose. ... An experiment will be
    often equivalent to a publication.

30
MGED Ontology
  • Chromosome Def An abstraction used for
    annotation
  • Chromosome Def A biological sequence that can be
    placed on an array

31
OBI
  • The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations

with thanks to Trish Whetzel and Richard
Scheuermann
32
Purpose of OBI
  • To provide a resource for the unambiguous
    description of the components of biomedical
    investigations such as the design, protocols and
    instrumentation, material, data and types of
    analysis and statistical tools applied to the
    data
  • NOT designed to model biology

33
Hypothesis
  • That it is possible to create ontology resources
    of genuine utility by drawing on logical and
    philosophical principles e.g. pertaining to
    consistency of definitions, avoidance of
    use-mention confusions.

34
OBI Collaborating Communities
  • Crop sciences Generation Challenge Programme
    (GCP),
  • Environmental genomics MGED RSBI Group,
    www.mged.org/Workgroups/rsbi
  • Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC),
    www.genomics.ceh.ac.uk/genomecatalogue
  • HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative (PSI),
    psidev.sourceforge.net
  • Immunology Database and Analysis Portal,
    www.immport.org
  • Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource
    (IEDB), http//www.immuneepitope.org/home.do
  • International Society for Analytical Cytology,
    http//www.isac-net.org/
  • Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI),
  • Neurogenetics, Biomedical Informatics Research
    Network (BIRN),
  • Nutrigenomics MGED RSBI Group, www.mged.org/Workgr
    oups/rsbi
  • Polymorphism
  • Toxicogenomics MGED RSBI Group,
    www.mged.org/Workgroups/rsbi
  • Transcriptomics MGED Ontology Group

35
OBI Tools and Documentation
  • Open source, standards compliant and version
    management
  • Ontology Web Language (OWL) using Protégé editor
  • OBI.owl files are available from the OBI SVN
    Repository

36
The Problem of Clinical Investigations
  • Regulatory bodies such as the FDA need to assess
    the evidentiary value of enormous volumes of data
    collected e.g. in trials on specific drug
    formulations
  • For this, they need to impose standardization of
    terminologies used to express these data, e.g. as
    developed by the Clinical Data Interchange
    Standards Consortium (CDISC)

37
(No Transcript)
38
Clinical Investigations terminologies
39
Study Design
  • Descriptive research
  • Case study description of one or more patients
  • Developmental research description of pattern
    of change over time
  • Qualitative research gathering data through
    interview or observation
  • Exploratory research
  • Secondary analysis exploring new relationships
    in old data
  • Historical research reconstructing the past
    through an assessment of archives or other
    records
  • Experimental research
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Meta-analysis statistically combining findings
    from several different studies to obtain a
    summary analysis

40
Population
  • Recruited population
  • Randomized population
  • Eligible population
  • Screened population
  • Premature termination population
  • Excluded population
  • Excluded post-randomization population
  • Not-eligible-population
  • Analyzed population
  • Study arm population
  • Crossover population
  • Subgroup population
  • Intent-to-treat population - based on
    randomization

41
Overview of OCI
42
Development plan (CDISC) Standard operating
procedures (CDISC) Statistical analysis plan
(CDISC)
Meta-analysis (CDISC) Quality assurance
(CDISC) Quality control (CDISC) Baseline
assessment (CDISC) Validation (CDISC) Coding
(MUSC) Permuted block randomization
(MUSC) Secondary-study-protocol
(RCT) Intervention-step (RCT) Blinding-method
(RCT)
Study design
43
Negative findings (MUSC) Positive findings
(MUSC) Primary-outcome (RCT) Secondary-outcome
(RCT)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
EXPO
  • The Ontology of Experiments
  • L. Soldatova, R. King
  • Department of Computer Science
  • The University of Wales, Aberystwyth

47
EXPO Experiment Ontology
48
EXPO Experiment Ontology
49
EXPO Experiment Ontology
50
experimental actions part_of experimental
design subject of experiment part_of experimental
design
51
Role of Philosophy of Science
EXPO Experiment Ontology
52
Towards Empirical Philosophy of Science
  • rational statistical models of induction
  • case-based / domain-based reasoning
  • falsifiabilism
  • Humeanism vs. laws
  • logical, relative frequency, Bayesian, objective
    (chance) and epistemic theories of probability
  • These generate different ontologies of
    scientific evidence
  • which one is correct?

53
  • Environment Ontology
  • Phenotypic Quality Ontology
  • Ontology for Personalized and Community
  • Medicine
  • Racial Phenotypes Social, Phylogenetic,
    Essentialistic ...

54
  • Ontology for Personalized and Community
  • Medicine
  • to support studies of differential effects on
    health
  • 1. of environmental qualities of different
    neighborhoods
  • and
  • 2. of different community behavior phenotypes
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com