STARDUST Project - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

STARDUST Project

Description:

20 Nov 2003. CERR - Ryan. STARDUST. STARDUST Project. CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS REVIEW ... 5..9.3.3 Earned value not used in Phase E. 7.8.5 No Project Safety ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: naifJp
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STARDUST Project


1
STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS
REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER Design
Principals Compliance Robert Ryan
JPL 303-411 AM / 301-427 PM LMA MSA 1 818
354-1275 0800 AM - 0500 PM PST 20 Nov 2003
2
PFPD PRINCIPALS COMPLIANCE
  • Project policies and mission success criteria
    relevant to encounter
  • Documentation has been reviewed and updated
  • Mission Plan, Mission Success Criteria
  • Requirements reviewed with applicable subsystems
  • Encounter operations defined by regular STARDUST
    operations
  • Multiple opportunities for all uplinks
  • Exercised our TCM GO/NOGO and Last Update at
    Annefrank
  • Successful ORT to review TCM file transfer and
    turn-around time on 11/5
  • Additional ORT in early December for final TCM
    and Update

1 of 5
3
PFPD PRINCIPALS COMPLIANCE
  • Design Principles compliance assessment
  • Compliance exception due to Spacecraft/Mission
    Design
  • 3.3.1 Continuous Telecommunications Capability
    during Events
  • Fixed design of the spacecraft means that the
    bank turn during flyby could cause loss of comm.
    In the Mission Plan does not impact prime
    science
  • 9.3.1 Powering off the RF downlink
  • Insufficient solar power beyond 2 AU for
    continuous operation
  • Possible risk of db loss due to continuous SSPA
    operation
  • Flight Project Practices compliance assessment
  • Three potential non-compliances, related to
    Discovery class small organization
  • 5.4.2 Organizational positions
  • 5..9.3.3 Earned value not used in Phase E
  • 7.8.5 No Project Safety Steering committee

2 of 5
4
PFPD PRINCIPALS COMPLIANCE
  • Results of review of lessons learned data base
  • Reviewed Master Lessons Learned data base
  • Developed SDU Lessons Learned Matrix
  • 39 Significant Items
  • Reviewed Cassini and MER Lessons Learned
  • No additional items applied
  • Developed Annefrank Lessons Learned Matrix
  • 38 Action Items
  • Closed in June 2003
  • Reviewed during August Workshop

3 of 5
5
Mission Assurance
Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST for WILD-2
RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS
LIKELIHOOD 5
LIKELIHOOD 4
LIKELIHOOD 3
LIKELIHOOD 2 14 23
LIKELIHOOD 1 17 19 3,6,11,12,13,18,21,24 1,2,4,5,7,8,9,10,15,16,20,22,25
LIKELIHOOD 1 2 3 4 5
CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE
Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix.
4 of 5
6
Mission Assurance
Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST (cont.)
Mission Design Risk 23. Updated Comet Dust
Production model changes dust distribution Mitiga
tion Activity Flyby moved from planned 150 km to
300 km to mitigate risk of a large particle
hit. STATUS Plan at NASA Headquarters for
approval
5 of 5
7
Preparation for Wild 2
  • BACKUP MATERIAL

B-1 of 8
8
Project Residual Risk Methodology
R
isk
As
sess
m
e
n
t
C
r
i
te
r
ia
f
o
r
L
ike
l
ih
o
od

an
d C
o
n
seq
u
e
n
ce
R
isk
T
y
p
e
(
e
i
t
her
o
r
bo
t
h ma
y a
pp
ly
to
e
a
c
h
r
i
sk
)


M
issi
o
n R
i
sk


Im
pl
emen
t
at
i
on
Risk
L
i
keli
h
o
o
d
o
f
Oc
c
u
r
re
n
ce
Le
v
e
l
L
ik
e
li
hood
Le
v
e
l
De
fi
n
i
t
i
o
n
5
V
er
y

Hi
gh
4
H
i
g
h
3
M
ode
r
a
t
e
2
Lo
w
1
V
er
y

L
ow
C
o
n
se
q
ue
n
ce
o
f
Oc
c
u
r
re
n
ce
Le
v
e
l
Mi
s
si
on

R
i
s
k
Lev
el

D
ef
i
n
iti
on
s
5
Mi
s
si
on

fa
il
u
r
e
4
Si
gn
i
f
ic
an
t

r
edu
c
t
io
n

i
n
mi
s
si
on

re
t
u
r
n
3
M
ode
r
a
t
e
r
edu
c
t
io
n

i
n
mi
s
si
on

re
t
ur
n
2
S
m
al
l r
e
du
c
t
i
on
i
n
m
i
s
s
io
n

r
e
t
urn
1
Mi
n
im
a
l

(
or no
)

im
pa
c
t
t
o
mis
s
i
o
n
S
e
v
er
i
ty
Le
v
e
l
I
m
pl
e
m
en
t
at
i
o
n

Ri
s
k
L
e
ve
l
De
fi
n
it
i
o
n
5
O
v
err
u
n budge
t
and c
o
nt
in
gen
c
y
,

c
ann
o
t
m
ee
t

l
a
u
nch
w
it
h
c
u
rr
e
nt
r
e
sou
r
ce
s
4
C
o
nsu
m
e

a
ll

c
on
ti
ngen
c
y
,
budg
e
t or
s
che
d
u
l
e
B- 5 of 8
I
mp
l
em
e
n
t
n
e
w

p
r
o
c
e
s
s
(
e
s)
3
Si
gn
i
f
ic
an
t

r
edu
c
t
io
n

i
n
c
on
t
i
n
gen
c
y or
l
au
n
ch
s
l
a
c
k
o
r
c
h
an
g
e b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e
p
l
an
(s
)
2
S
m
al
l r
e
du
c
t
i
on
i
n

co
n
t
i
n
g
enc
y
or
l
aun
c
h

sl
a
c
k
1

Mi
n
im
a
l

r
edu
c
t
io
n

i
n
c
on
t
i
n
gen
c
y or
l
aun
c
h s
l
a
c
k
A
g
g
r
e
s
s
i
v
e
l
y
m
a
n
a
g
e

c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
ti
ve
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
9
Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST
B-6 of 8
10
Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST (cont.)
B-7 of 8
11
Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST (cont.)
B-8 of 8
12
Lessons Learned

Annefrank Lessons Learned Action Items
B-2 of 8
13
Lessons Learned
  • Annefrank Lessons Learned Action Items (continued)

B-3 of 8
14
Lessons Learned
  • Annefrank Lessons Learned Action Items (continued)

B-4 of 8
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com