Title: STARDUST Project
1STARDUST Project CRITICAL EVENTS READINESS
REVIEW COMET P/WILD 2 ENCOUNTER Design
Principals Compliance Robert Ryan
JPL 303-411 AM / 301-427 PM LMA MSA 1 818
354-1275 0800 AM - 0500 PM PST 20 Nov 2003
2PFPD PRINCIPALS COMPLIANCE
- Project policies and mission success criteria
relevant to encounter - Documentation has been reviewed and updated
- Mission Plan, Mission Success Criteria
- Requirements reviewed with applicable subsystems
- Encounter operations defined by regular STARDUST
operations - Multiple opportunities for all uplinks
- Exercised our TCM GO/NOGO and Last Update at
Annefrank - Successful ORT to review TCM file transfer and
turn-around time on 11/5 - Additional ORT in early December for final TCM
and Update
1 of 5
3PFPD PRINCIPALS COMPLIANCE
- Design Principles compliance assessment
- Compliance exception due to Spacecraft/Mission
Design - 3.3.1 Continuous Telecommunications Capability
during Events - Fixed design of the spacecraft means that the
bank turn during flyby could cause loss of comm.
In the Mission Plan does not impact prime
science - 9.3.1 Powering off the RF downlink
- Insufficient solar power beyond 2 AU for
continuous operation - Possible risk of db loss due to continuous SSPA
operation - Flight Project Practices compliance assessment
- Three potential non-compliances, related to
Discovery class small organization - 5.4.2 Organizational positions
- 5..9.3.3 Earned value not used in Phase E
- 7.8.5 No Project Safety Steering committee
2 of 5
4PFPD PRINCIPALS COMPLIANCE
- Results of review of lessons learned data base
- Reviewed Master Lessons Learned data base
- Developed SDU Lessons Learned Matrix
- 39 Significant Items
- Reviewed Cassini and MER Lessons Learned
- No additional items applied
- Developed Annefrank Lessons Learned Matrix
- 38 Action Items
- Closed in June 2003
- Reviewed during August Workshop
3 of 5
5Mission Assurance
Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST for WILD-2
RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS RESIDUAL RISKS
LIKELIHOOD 5
LIKELIHOOD 4
LIKELIHOOD 3
LIKELIHOOD 2 14 23
LIKELIHOOD 1 17 19 3,6,11,12,13,18,21,24 1,2,4,5,7,8,9,10,15,16,20,22,25
LIKELIHOOD 1 2 3 4 5
CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE CONSEQUENCE
Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix. Note The numbers listed on this chart reference the risk numbers from the slides immediately following this color matrix.
4 of 5
6Mission Assurance
Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST (cont.)
Mission Design Risk 23. Updated Comet Dust
Production model changes dust distribution Mitiga
tion Activity Flyby moved from planned 150 km to
300 km to mitigate risk of a large particle
hit. STATUS Plan at NASA Headquarters for
approval
5 of 5
7Preparation for Wild 2
B-1 of 8
8Project Residual Risk Methodology
R
isk
As
sess
m
e
n
t
C
r
i
te
r
ia
f
o
r
L
ike
l
ih
o
od
an
d C
o
n
seq
u
e
n
ce
R
isk
T
y
p
e
(
e
i
t
her
o
r
bo
t
h ma
y a
pp
ly
to
e
a
c
h
r
i
sk
)
M
issi
o
n R
i
sk
Im
pl
emen
t
at
i
on
Risk
L
i
keli
h
o
o
d
o
f
Oc
c
u
r
re
n
ce
Le
v
e
l
L
ik
e
li
hood
Le
v
e
l
De
fi
n
i
t
i
o
n
5
V
er
y
Hi
gh
4
H
i
g
h
3
M
ode
r
a
t
e
2
Lo
w
1
V
er
y
L
ow
C
o
n
se
q
ue
n
ce
o
f
Oc
c
u
r
re
n
ce
Le
v
e
l
Mi
s
si
on
R
i
s
k
Lev
el
D
ef
i
n
iti
on
s
5
Mi
s
si
on
fa
il
u
r
e
4
Si
gn
i
f
ic
an
t
r
edu
c
t
io
n
i
n
mi
s
si
on
re
t
u
r
n
3
M
ode
r
a
t
e
r
edu
c
t
io
n
i
n
mi
s
si
on
re
t
ur
n
2
S
m
al
l r
e
du
c
t
i
on
i
n
m
i
s
s
io
n
r
e
t
urn
1
Mi
n
im
a
l
(
or no
)
im
pa
c
t
t
o
mis
s
i
o
n
S
e
v
er
i
ty
Le
v
e
l
I
m
pl
e
m
en
t
at
i
o
n
Ri
s
k
L
e
ve
l
De
fi
n
it
i
o
n
5
O
v
err
u
n budge
t
and c
o
nt
in
gen
c
y
,
c
ann
o
t
m
ee
t
l
a
u
nch
w
it
h
c
u
rr
e
nt
r
e
sou
r
ce
s
4
C
o
nsu
m
e
a
ll
c
on
ti
ngen
c
y
,
budg
e
t or
s
che
d
u
l
e
B- 5 of 8
I
mp
l
em
e
n
t
n
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
(
e
s)
3
Si
gn
i
f
ic
an
t
r
edu
c
t
io
n
i
n
c
on
t
i
n
gen
c
y or
l
au
n
ch
s
l
a
c
k
o
r
c
h
an
g
e b
a
s
e
l
i
n
e
p
l
an
(s
)
2
S
m
al
l r
e
du
c
t
i
on
i
n
co
n
t
i
n
g
enc
y
or
l
aun
c
h
sl
a
c
k
1
Mi
n
im
a
l
r
edu
c
t
io
n
i
n
c
on
t
i
n
gen
c
y or
l
aun
c
h s
l
a
c
k
A
g
g
r
e
s
s
i
v
e
l
y
m
a
n
a
g
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
ti
ve
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
9Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST
B-6 of 8
10Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST (cont.)
B-7 of 8
11Stardust RESIDUAL RISK LIST (cont.)
B-8 of 8
12Lessons Learned
Annefrank Lessons Learned Action Items
B-2 of 8
13Lessons Learned
- Annefrank Lessons Learned Action Items (continued)
B-3 of 8
14Lessons Learned
- Annefrank Lessons Learned Action Items (continued)
B-4 of 8