Title: Total en bloc Spondylectomy
1Total en bloc Spondylectomy
- If not for primary malignant tumors,
- for what else then?
Sohail Bajammal, MBChB, MSc, FRCS(C) October 29,
2008
2Above Knee Amputation
3Nakamura S., Kusuzaki K., Murata H. et al. More
than 10 years of follow-up of two patients after
total femur replacement for malignant bone tumor.
International Orthopaedics. 24(3)176-8, 2000.
4Evidence-Based PracticeHaynes et al. BMJ 2002
5Hierarchy of Evidence
6Primary Tumors of the Spine
Incidence 2.5 to 8.5 cases per 100,000 persons /
yr
Chi JH, Bydon A, Hsieh P, et al. Epidemiology and
Demographics for Primary Vertebral Tumors.
Neurosurgery Clinics of North America. 19(1)
1-4, 2008.
7Enneking Principles of Orthopaedic Oncology
8Enneking Principles of Orthopaedic Oncology
9Enneking Principles of Orthopaedic Oncology
10Enneking Principles of Orthopaedic Oncology
11Surgical Options
- Removal of the tumor, with violation of the
capsule and piecemeal removal of the growth, with
margins defined by the tumor itself - Acceptable for metastatic tumors and benign
tumors - Familiar approach
- Risk of recurrence
- Complete removal of the tumor without violation
of its capsule, and with clearly defined normal
tissue as margins - Ideal for primary malignant locally aggressive
tumors - Technically demanding
- Less risk of recurrence
12Total en bloc Spondylectomy
- Stener (1971) chondrosarcoma
- Roy-Camille (1981-1990) popularized the
procedure - Tomita et al. and Fidler (1994) further
popularized
13Decision Making
- Degree of difficulty
- Complications
- Feasibility of en bloc resection
- Patients preference
- Surgeons expertise
14Staging Systems
- WBB Staging System
- Tomita Classification System
15Weinstein JN, McLain RF. Primary tumors of the
spine. Spine 19871284351.
- 82 cases (31 benign 51 malignant)
- The mean follow-up 9.7 yr in benign and 3.8 yr
in malignant lesions - Five-year survival 86 for benign lesions
- Five-year survival in malignant lesions
- undergoing curettage nil
- undergoing incomplete resection 18.7
- undergoing complete excision 75
16Weinstein JN, McLain RF. Primary tumors of the
spine. Spine 19871284351.
17Boriani et al. En bloc resections of bone tumors
of the thoracolumbar spine. A preliminary report
on 29 patients. Spine. 21(16)1927-31, 1996.
- 29 patients
- 25 primary malignant aggressive benign
- 4 solitary metastases
- Surgical time was 3-21 hr (average, 12 hr)
- Surgical margin
- wide in 20, marginal in 8, intralesional in 1
- No local recurrence was found at follow-up
evaluation after 6-134 mo (average, 30 mo)
18Tomita K, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy a
new surgical technique for primary malignant
vertebral tumors. Spine 19972232433.
19Hasegawa K, et al. Margin-free spondylectomy for
extended malignant spine tumors surgical
technique and outcome of 13 cases. Spine.
32(1)142-8, 2007
- 3 chondrosarcoma, 3 giant cell tumor, 1
osteosarcoma, 1 chordoma, and 5 metastases - No local recurrence, except in 2 cases
(chondrosarcoma with extirpation of 5 vertebrae,
chordoma with multiple previous surgeries) - Two cases of chondrosarcoma were disease-free 14
13 years after surgery
20Hasegawa et al. Spine 2007
21Abe E, et al. Total spondylectomy for primary
tumor of the thoracolumbar spine. Spinal Cord.
38(3)146-52, 2000 Mar.
- 6 patients
- Approach
- Posterior in 3 (T1 osteosarcoma, L1 osteosarcoma
and L1 chordoma) - Combined single stage anterior and posterior (T6
8 recurrent giant cell tumor, L4 chordoma and
L5 giant cell tumor) - Surgical Margins wide in 1, marginal in 4,
intralesional in 1.
22Abe E, et al. Total spondylectomy for primary
tumor of the thoracolumbar spine. Spinal Cord.
38(3)146-52, 2000 Mar.
- Five patients were alive without evidence of
tumor and one was alive with disease at follow-up
evaluation after 2.0 4.8 years. - Local recurrence was found in one case of T1
osteosarcoma with an intralesional margin.
23Junming M, et al. Giant cell tumor of the
cervical spine a series of 22 cases and
outcomes. Spine. 33(3)280-8, 2008
- 22 patients
- 8 subtotal resection, 13 total spondylectomy, 1
en bloc posterior element - Postoperative radiation in 18 cases
- Local recurrence
- 5 of 7 cases (71.4) subtotal resection,
- 1 of 13 cases (7.7) total spondylectomy.
- 4 cases died within follow-up and all were
recurrent cases.
24Melcher I, et al. Primary malignant bone tumors
and solitary metastases of the thoracolumbar
spine results by management with total en bloc
spondylectomy. European Spine Journal. 2007.
- 15 patients (3 primary malignant 12 solitary
metastases)
25Tomita K, et al. Total en bloc spondylectomy for
spinal tumors improvement of the technique and
its associated basic background. Journal of
Orthopaedic Science. 11(1)3-12, 2006.
- From 1989 to 2003, 284 spinal tumors
- primary tumors in 86 patients
- metastasis in 198 patients
- TES was performed in 33 of the 86 patients with a
primary tumor - 17 patients with a malignant tumor
- 16 with aggressive benign tumors
26Tomita et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2006
- The 5-year survival
- For the 17 patients with primary malignant tumors
was 67 - For the16 patients with aggressive benign tumors
(stages 2 and 3) was 100
27Liljenqvist U, et al. En bloc spondylectomy in
malignant tumors of the spine. European Spine
Journal. 17(4)600-9, 2008 Apr.
- 1997 and 2005, 21 consecutive patients
- 13 patients had primary malignant lesions
- 8 patients had solitary metastases
- Combined posteroanterior (n 19) or all
posterior approach (n 2) - Out of 11 patients with primary Ewing or
osteosarcoma seven patients are alive without any
evidence of disease.
28Liljenqvist et al. European Spine Journal 2008
29Liljenqvist et al. European Spine Journal 2008
30Major Risks of en bloc resection
- Mechanical and vascular spinal cord injury
- Injury to the major vascular structures
- Tumor margin violation during resection
- Significant operative blood loss because of
epidural venous bleeding
31Adjuvant Therapy
- Unlike the popular Pitchell trial for metastatic
tumors - In primary malignant tumors of the spine,
preoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy to
shrink the tumor mass
32Tomita et al. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2006
33Thank You