Title: GammaRay Burst afterglow plateaus
1Gamma-Ray Burst afterglow plateaus
Gravitational Waves probing the millisecond
magnetar scenario
Alessandra Corsi Peter Mészáros
University of Rome Sapienza Penn State
University
GWDAW 13 San Juan - 2009, January 19-23
2Outline of the talk
- Standard GRB progenitor scenarios and
expectations for the associated GW signals - GRB afterglow plateaus and the magnetar
progenitor scenario - Evolution of the magnetars spin down under the
effect of a secular bar-mode instability - Associated afterglow plateau and corresponding GW
signal
3Can we observe closer to the central engine?
Swift and other satellites, optical and radio
telescopes
1013 cm
1016 cm
4GW-GRB searches the standard scenario
In-spiral last few minutes in the band
accessible to LIGO and Virgo Merger and
ring-down few ms duration (burst-type signals)
5GW emission from GRB progenitors standard
scenario
Advanced LIGO
Advanced LIGO
Kobayashi Meszaros 2003
Fryer et al. 1999, Belczynski et al. 2002
6Are there other plausible progenitor scenarios?
(and why do we need them?)
7Recent Swift results flares plateaus
Zhang et al., 2006
Evidence for a prolonged central engine
activity! Flares and plateaus are commonly
observed in long GRBs, and also found in some
short GRBs
8How to account for a prolonged activity?
- Newborn magnetars among the scenarios proposed
to account for shallow decays or plateaus
observed in GRB afterglows. - Independent support to this scenario SN2006aj,
associated with the nearby (?140 Mpc)
sub-energetic GRB 060218 ? the SN-GRB connection
may extend to a range of masses much broader than
previously thought, possibly involving two
different mechanisms a collapsar for the more
massive stars collapsing to a BH, and a newborn
NS for the less massive ones (Mazzali et al.,
2006). - Dai Lu, 1998 there are at least two
possibilities for having a strongly magnetic
millisecond pulsar created during a GRB (i) an
accreting white dwarf collapsing to a rotating
NS, whose magnetic field is amplified by flux
conservation, with an initial fireball occurring
during the NS birth (relevant for long GRBs)
(ii) NS binaries merging into a massive, highly
magnetized and rapidly spinning NS, with a
fireball produced e.g. via neutrino/anti-neutrino
process.
9The magnetar scenario for GRBs
Assuming the spin-down is mainly due to
electromagnetic dipolar radiation and to GW
radiation, the spin-down law reads (Shapiro
Teukolsky 1983) I ? (d?/dt) - (B2R6?4)/(6c3)
- (32 G I2 ?2 ?6)/(5c5)
In previous works aimed to explain the em
plateaus (e.g. Dai Lu 1998, Zhang Meszaros
2001, Fan Dong 2006, Yu Huang 2007), this
term was neglected or considered as an
alternative limiting case, with ?const.
The energy input into the fireball is due to the
EM dipolar emission only
- angular frequency
- B dipolar field strength at the poles
- I moment of inertia
- R stellar radius
- ellipticity of the NS
10Considering only dipole losses and a star with
fixed shape
- I ? (d?/dt) -(B2R6?4)/(6c3)
- ?(t) ?0 (1T/Tem)-1/2
L(T)L0(1T/Tem)-2 - Plateau duration
- Tem? 2x103 s (I/1045 g cm2) (B/ 1015 G)-2?/(2? 1
kHz)-2 (R/10 km)-6 - Visibility condition L0 x Tem ? Eimp
Zhang Meszaros 2001
?0
L0
L0(T/Tem)-2
?0(T/Tem)-1/2
Tem
Tem
11What happens including GW losses in the spin-down?
?
?
a3
a1
?
a2
a3
a2
a1
Initial configuration Maclaurin spheroid a1a2?a3
Evolution Riemann-S ellipsoid a1?a2?a3
We have studied the contribution of GW losses to
the spin-down, under the hypothesis that a
secular bar-mode instability does set in the
newborn magnetar. According to the analytical
formulation given by Lai Shapiro (1995), we
follow the NS quasi-static evolution under the
effect of gravitational radiation, i.e. along an
equilibrium sequence of compressible Riemann-S
ellipsoids evolving toward a stationary football.
12General scenario
- Non-axisymmetric instabilities can develop in
rapidly rotating fluid bodies when the ratio
?T/W of rotational-to-gravitational potential
energy is sufficiently large - ??0.27 ? dynamical instability (possibly a
burst-type signal) - 0.14???0.27 ? lm2 bar-mode oscillations
become secularly unstable due to viscosity or
gravitational radiation reaction
??7x104 (M/1.4 M?)-3 (R/10 km)4 (?-0.14)/0.01-5
s TGW?few ?
For a given value of ?, one has fmax ? M1/2
R-3/2 fmax100 Hz for ?0.15, n1, M1.4 M?,
R10 km fmax600 Hz for ?0.25, n1, M1.4 M?,
R10 km
13Results dipole losses plus secular bar-mode
?0.18, n1, M1.4 M?, R20km, B3x1015 G
- Tem?5.4x103 s (dashed lines) and TGW?3??104 s
(dash-dotted lines) - The inclusion of GW losses (dash-dotted line)
speeds-up the process, causing ? to decay
somewhat earlier (solid lines) - Depending on the particular parameters choice,
one has Tplt?Min(TGW, Tem). Setting Tplt equal to
its observed value, this relation provides a
constrain on the parameters of the problem.
14Effect of magnetic dipole losses on the X-ray
light curve
We can then predict the effect of the NS dipole
losses on the fireball dynamics dRf/dt2c?2
d?/dt -3/2 (?/Rf) dRf/dt 3/2 Ldip
(4?nISMmpc2R3 ?)-1 Rffireball
radius nISMinterstellar medium number
density ?fireball Lorentz factor
GRB X-ray light curves are qualitatively compared
with our theoretical energy input model. Data
points are rescaled in flux and corrected for the
cosmological time delay. The blue, purple, and
light-green data points are from GRB061121,
GRB070420 and GRB080905b. Red data points are
from the short GRB 051221a.
15GW signal associated to the em plateau
h(t)4 G ?2 I ?/(c4d) hcf(t) h(t) (df/dt)-0.5
- We have ?max5 at d70-80 Mpc, or d100-120 Mpc
assuming, as a rule-of-thumb, that knowledge of
the GRB trigger time reduces the detection
threshold of a factor of 1.5 (Kochanek Piran
1993 Cutler Thorne 2002). - Higher confidence in a detection
lt?gt(2/5)0.5?max? 5 in each of a 3-detectors
network with similar hrms (Cutler Flanagan
1994). With the help of the GRB trigger time ?
compensating for the (2/5)0.5 factor, this gives
d ? 70 - 80 Mpc.
_at_ 70 Mpc
Virgo
Adv Virgo/LIGO
16Some comments on the nearest GRBs
- Currently observed GRB 980425 _at_ 40 Mpc, GRB
060218 _at_ 140 Mpc (and sub-luminos, nearby GRBs
are expected to occur with a higher rate than
normal GRBs, INTEGRAL catalog probably include
some few more events, and future missions like
EXIST and Janus could enlarge the sample). - Some other nearby candidate events GRB 050906
(short) _at_ 130 Mpc? GRB 070201 in M31? GRB081215a
in M31? - Expectations for short GRBs Our best-fit
model to the current observations predicts that
about 3 of the SHBs observed by BATSE are within
100 Mpc while about 1 are within 50 Mpc. Given
that Swift detects 10 SHBs per yr, and that its
threshold is comparable to that of BATSE, the
expected rate of simultaneous detections of an
SHB and a GW signal is 0.3 (0.1) per year
(Nakar, Gal-Yam, Fox 2006). If we consider the
GBM on-board GLAST, the rate of SHB within 100
Mpc is expected to be of about 1 per year.
17Conclusions (I)
- Our results point to a new class of GW signals
to be searched for in coincidence with GRB
triggers. Nearby GRBs with EisoO(1050 ergs)
would produce a GW signal that could be detected
by the adv Virgo/LIGO, emitted in association
with an observed X-ray light-curve plateau, over
relatively long timescales. - The peak amplitude of the GW signal would be
delayed with respect to the GRB trigger, thus
offering GW interferometers the challenging
possibility of catching its signature on the fly.
This would be relevant to call for a follow-up
with optical and radio telescopes. - For GW detectors, our results are relevant in
the light of the fact that (I) Virgo and LIGO
are already active on GRB-GW searches (e.g.
Acernese et al. 2008 Abbott et al. 2008) (II)
Virgo and LIGO are exchanging data and getting
prepared to develop online analyses soon, in
their enhanced configuration (III) Adv detectors
should arrive in ?2013-2015.
18Conclusions (II)
- The GW signal is linked to an em signature. The
NS properties, such as M and R, determine both
the duration Tplt and luminosity Ldip,i of the
observed afterglow plateau, as well as the
initial frequency and amplitude h of the
associated GW signal. Thus, a correlation does
exist with the em emission, apart from the
trigger itself, which GW detectors might use to
enhance the confidence of an eventual detection.
Moreover, the presence of such a GW signal may
confirm us the GRB/magnetar scenario.
??7x104 (M/1.4 M?)-3 (R/10 km)4 (?-0.14)/0.01-5
s
Tem? 2x103 s (I/1045 g cm2) (B/ 1015 G)-2?/(2? 1
kHz)-2 (R/10 km)-6 Tplt?Min(TGW,Tem)
Visibility condition Ldip,i xTplt ? Eimp
fmax ? M1/2 R-3/2
Ldip,i(Bi2Ri6?i4)/(6c3)
h(t)4 G ?2 I ?/(c4d)
19The End
20The secular timescale
Lai Shapiro, 1995
Secular instability growth time due to
gravitational radiation as a function of ? for a
NS modeled as a compressible Maclaurin spheroid,
with M1.4 M? and R10 km. Solid, dotted and
dashed lines correspond to the bar-mode (m2)
instability for polytropic index n0, n0.5 and
n1 respectively. The long-dashed line is for n0
and m3.
??2x10-5 (M/1.4 M?)-3 (R/10 km)4 (?-?sec)-5
Starting from a secularly unstable Maclaurin
spheroid, a little perturbation will cause the
star to evolve along a Riemann-S sequence on a
timescale TGW of the order of few ?
21Maximum frequency of the emitted GW signal
Lai Shapiro, 1995
Maximum frequency of the GWs radiated during the
evolution of a NS from an unstable Maclaurin
spheroid to a stable Dedekind ellipsoid ad a
function of ?. Values of M1.4 M? and R10 km
are assumed. Solid, dotted and dashed lines
correspond to polytropic indices of n0, n0.5
and n1 respectively.
For a given value of ?, one has fmax ? M1/2 R-3/2
22Immediate neighborhood of the source
GRBs EM signal and GWs
d ? 1013 cm from the source
EM signal
GW emission
Source position, distance and trigger time
Structure and density of the surrounding medium
short vs long, compact binaries vs massive
progenitors Total energy output hints on the
disk mass of the bh accretion disk system
powering the GRB
Amplitude of the GW signal hints on the masses
(e.g. chirp or mass ratio), total energy output
in GWs
Nature of the progenitor
23The secular evolution
Lai Shapiro, 1995
? angular frequency of the ellipsoidal
figure ?angular frequency of the internal
fluid motions
The problem depends on some initial parameters,
which also set the relevant physical scales -
polytropic index n - total mass M of the NS -
length unit R0 (radius of the non-rotating,
spherical equilibrium polytrope) - ratio ? of
kinetic to gravitational potential energy (or
internal fluid circulation) - intensity of the
dipolar magnetic field
24GW signals expected in the standard scenario 3
phases
- In-spiral expected only for short GRBs, the
emitted GWs are in the frequency band accessible
to VIRGO LIGO only for the last few minutes of
in-spiral (e.g. Cutler Flanagan 1994). - Merger associated to a burst-type signal, with
duration of the order of few ms. It can occur in
long GRBs if dynamical instabilities develop into
the collapsing core or in the disc, and naturally
occurs in short GRBs. - Ring-down burst-type signal, due to GW emission
associated with the BH deformations. Damped
oscillation, with duration of the order of few ms.