AN OVERNIGHT SURVEY OF THE USE OF BEDRAILS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

AN OVERNIGHT SURVEY OF THE USE OF BEDRAILS

Description:

To detail the numbers and types of bedrails in the Trust. ... In some areas the footboard to rail-end gap did appear at times to be outside of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: alison57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AN OVERNIGHT SURVEY OF THE USE OF BEDRAILS


1
AN OVERNIGHT SURVEY OF THE USE OF
BEDRAILS Shanahan D1 Evans AM2 1Consultant Nurse
2Research and Development Nurse Cardiff and Vale
NHS Trust
Background
To ensure that bedrails are appropriately used
to reduce the risk of patients accidentally
falling or rolling out of bed and are not used as
a form of restraint the National Patient Safety
Agency advised all NHS Trusts to audit the
overnight use of bedrails to inform the develop
a policy for their safe and effective use.
Aim
Method
  • To detail the numbers and types of bedrails in
    the Trust.
  • To determine the location, demographics and
    characteristics of the patients where bedrails
    were in use.
  • To undertake a preliminary exploration into the
    reasons staff gave for their use.
  • A night time observational audit of every third
    occupied bed in adult in-patient areas (excluding
    adult mental health and obstetrics) and patients
    in the community.
  • Nurses questioned regarding patient
    characteristics and the reasons that the bedrails
    were in use.

Results
Sixty six in-patient areas audited. 564
in-patient beds and 17 community beds (n581)
BEDRAIL USE BY LOCATION
  • 22 (n 124) of wards use a bedrails assessment
    tool
  • 61.5 (n347)of wards use a falls risk assessment
    tool
  • 73 of beds occupied by patients 65 years or
    older
  • Of the patients with bedrails in full use 82
    were over 65 years
  • Using the MHRA Safe Use of Bedrails Guide as a
    reference 77 (n447) of the beds appeared to
    have bedrails fitted correctly. In some areas the
    footboard to rail-end gap did appear at times to
    be outside of these recommendations
  • THE REASON STAFF GAVE FOR DECIDING TO RAISE THE
    BEDRAILS
  • Bedrails used
  • Patient was considered at risk of rolling out of
    bed 41 (n123)
  • To stop the patient getting up as they are at
    risk of falling 25 (n73)
  • The patient being confused 13 (n39)
  • Bedrails not used
  • The patient did not need them 91 (n269)
  • The patient was at risk of climbing over the
    bedrails 4 (n12)
  • Confusion was cited on only one occasion

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PATIENTS IN AUDITED BEDS
Main Findings
Future Plans
  • Of the sample surveyed 38 of patients had a full
    set of bedrails raised at night compared with the
    NPSA findings of 26.
  • The majority of patients who a full set of
    bedrails raised were unable to walk, unable to
    leave bed or needing help from nurses to walk or
    transfer.
  • The majority of patients who had partial bedrails
    raised were unsteady when walking although did so
    independently.
  • Of the patients with identified mobility problems
    86 of patients had bedrails raised compared with
    the NPSA findings of 93.
  • Development of a policy for the safe and
    effective use of bedrails
  • Education strategy to disseminate these evidence
    based practice guidelines
  • Introduction of a falls risk indicator in
    conjunction with the Trust Falls Prevention and
    Intervention Guidelines
  • The development of a mechanical restraint policy
  • Re audit to evaluate the impact of the policy on
    clinical practice.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com