REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS Setting targets and monitoring progress

About This Presentation
Title:

REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS Setting targets and monitoring progress

Description:

4-WGWH requested ad hoc working group to develop guidance document for ... Incoherence in data formats. Need for external quality control. Progress ... –

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: Rae29
Learn more at: https://unece.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS Setting targets and monitoring progress


1
REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF PROGRESS Setting
targets and monitoring progress
  • MP.WAT/WG.4/2005/4 EUR/05/5047554/4

2
Background
  • 4-WGWH requested ad hoc working group to develop
    guidance document for implementation of Articles
    6 and 7 of the Protocol.
  • Guidance document to contain coherent set of
    indicators for examination by 5-WGWH

3
Copenhagen 9 10 May
  • Croatia, Czech Republic, Finland, Hungary, Malta,
    the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovakia,
    Ukraine
  • UNECE, OECD
  • ISO, EUREAU
  • WHO and WHO Collaborating Centres

4
Setting targets
  • Global commitments
  • Millennium Development Goals
  • Universal Human rights
  • Regional commitments
  • Conference of Ministers of Health and Environment
  • European Directives
  • National priorities

5
Key target areas based on human rights
  • Access to water
  • Quality of the water supplied
  • Quality of the service
  • Reasonable distance

6
Monitoring progress
  • Scientifically and technically sound
  • Compatible with existing systems
  • Complement existing systems
  • Field-tested before the 1-MOP-PWH

7
Indicator criteria
  • Representative answer public service questions
    regarding quality, continuity, and economy and
    responsive to new expectations
  • Measurable and reliable easily accessible data,
    clear definition, and calculation method
  • Understandable each indicator makes sense to all
    stakeholders

8
Indicators considered
  • JMP technology based
  • EU monitoring strategy
  • ECOHEIS ENHIS
  • National reporting systems
  • Mediterranean Action Plan
  • ISO

9
Table 1 CPH REPORT
10
Problems expected
  • Lack of information electronic or otherwise
  • Wide dissipation of information over different
    stakeholders
  • Incoherence in data formats
  • Need for external quality control

11
Progress
  • Two types of field testing
  • Field-testing ECOHEIS ECOHENIS
  • Amended WHO UNICEF JMP
  • Problems encountered
  • Generally operable
  • Suggestions for improvement

12
Actions by WGWH
  • Agree on the proposal of the expert group.
  • Environmental aspects/parameters.
  • Preparation for 1-MOP-PWH
  • Guidance document.
  • Current status baseline.
  • Existing documentation
  • Provided by focal point
  • Special meeting for EECCA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com