From last time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

From last time

Description:

372a-372c Socrates describes an ideal city. But Glaucon objects. ... Maybe the best way of describing these different desires is that they conflict, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: gordon87
Category:
Tags: describes | last | time

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From last time


1
From last time
  • Three kinds of good
  • Glaucons claim that justice is good as a means
  • ----We act justly to get the benefits of seeming
    to be just
  • The ring of Gyges thought experiment shows us
    that we if we can avoid the disadvantages, we
    would be unjust when it serves our interests

2
We need to first discover what justice is
  • Socrates Justice is easier to discover in a
    city, then in an individual, so lets discover
    what justice is in a city first, then we can
    better see how justice applies to individuals.
  • So they begin to discuss what an ideal city would
    be like

3
The principle of specialization
  • People have different natural talents. A well run
    city will have each person do what they are by
    nature best suited for.
  • If you work at one task regularly you will get
    better at that task

4
  • 372a-372c Socrates describes an ideal city.
  • But Glaucon objects.

5
  • The first ideal city lacks luxuries, it is a
    simple city.
  • Socrates says while the simple city still strikes
    him as ideal, it might be useful to look into a
    wealthy, feverish, city.

6
What new thing do we get with a wealthy, feverish
city?
  • WAR!
  • We need warriors.
  • Following the principle of specialization, these
    warriors need to be those who are best suited for
    the task, a professional army.
  • They also need to be trained appropriately.

7
The three classes
  • The warriors will be those best suited to be in
    the military class
  • But there also needs to be a class of rulers.
    These too will be people best suited to rule
  • The city will be composed of three classes
    Guardians, auxilliaries, and producers. Each
    composed of people who are naturally suited for
    their task

8
The upper two classes
  • Will live communally, eat together, will not be
    allowed material goods except for their simple
    clothes and weapons.
  • Socrates thinks this will help keep the upper
    classes from becoming corrupt.

9
The myth of the metals
  • The city will prosper as long as everyone stays
    in their appropriate class.
  • Each is to be taught they have a kind of metal in
    their soulsgold for rulers, silver for the
    warriors, bronze or iron for the producers
  • They will also be taught that if the metals ever
    mix (if a a non-gold souled person became a
    ruler) the city will perish.

10
Adeimantus objection
  • People will not be happy in this ideal city,
    especially the rulers and warriors.
  • Socrates responds that these people will
    actually be happiest. But in any case, his
    concern is with constructing an ideal city as a
    whole. It would not be appropriate to give a part
    of the city a happiness that is not appropriate
    to it.

11
  • The city is moderate because of a harmony between
    the parts. Each will agree as to who will rule
    and be ruled.
  • The city is just because of the principle of
    specialization. Each part performs its natural
    function
  • It is because of justice that the city exhibits
    the other three virtues.

12
Justice in the soul
  • By analogy, Socrates claims that justice in the
    soul be each part of the soul performing its
    natural function. Reason will rule, Spirit will
    aid reason, and the appetites will be in check
  • But in order to say this, he needs to show that
    the soul is divided into three parts

13
The principle of opposites
  • No one thing can have opposite properties
  • So if the soul at the same time exhibits
    oppostite properties, this shows there are at
    least two distinct parts
  • Socrates needs to show reason, spirit, and
    appetite are distinct from each other

14
Reason and Appetite
  • I desire to drink, and desire not to drink.
  • Appetite desires to drink, but reason can tell me
    not to. (similar arguments can be given for
    hunger, sex etc)
  • Therefore, appetite is distinct from reason

15
Spirit and appetite
  • Leontious desires to look at dead bodies, he
    gives in to his desire, but feels repulsion at
    the same time.
  • This shows spirit can rebel against appetite,
    desiring the opposite. So its distinct

16
Spirit and Reason
  • You can be angry at your friend, but reason holds
    you back
  • Children and animals are spirited, but do not
    have reason
  • Therefore, reason and spirit are distinct

17
Is this argument any good
  • Are the examples really examples of opposite
    desires, or conflicting desires.
  • Maybe the best way of describing these different
    desires is that they conflict, not that they are
    opposites. The desire to eat ice cream and desire
    not to be overweight are conflicting but not
    opposite desires.

18
Justice and Conventional morality
  • Is there any reason to suppose that the person
    who is just in Socrates sense will also act
    justly? The definition of justice does not say
    anything about how such an ideally just person
    will act

19
Individual and Civic Justice
  • In the ideal city, only the top class is really
    ruled by reason.
  • But would it not be better to have a society in
    which every member is ideally just?
  • Maybe this is not practical
  • In one sense everyone in the ideal city obeys
    reason, but some do by obeying the rulers, others
    by obeying an internal rationality.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com