Girls are better, even girls with dyslexia?! - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Girls are better, even girls with dyslexia?!

Description:

Girls are better, even girls with dyslexia?! Gender differences in reading ... incorporation of special facilities for dyslexic children in every-day practice ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Ani560
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Girls are better, even girls with dyslexia?!


1
Girls are better, even girls with
dyslexia?! Gender differences in reading
performance of teenagers with and without
dyslexia Dr. Anita Blonk Dr. Anna
BosmanUniversity of Nijmegen Department of
Special Education A.Blonk_at_ped.kun.nlA.Bosman_at_ped
.kun.nl
2
Introduction
  • Students with dyslexia are often regarded slow
    learners. Despite intensive reading and spelling
    instruction, and practice, they appear highly
    resistant to intervention activities, as
    indicated by the fact that their reading and/or
    spelling levels generally remain at a
    significantly lower level than that of students
    without dyslexia.

3
Protocol Dyslexia Secundary Education (to appear
in 2004)
  • The main goal of the protocol is the
    incorporation of special facilities for dyslexic
    children in every-day practice in different types
    of secondary education.
  • To be able to help all students with dyslexia, it
    needs to be established who has and who has not
    dyslexia, since that is not yet clear when
    students enter secondary education. The protocol
    also includes a procedure for the classification
    and diagnosis of dyslexia. It includes for
    instance three tests and a sample of a
    questionnaire for the assessment of dyslexia in
    primary school.

4
Gender differences
  • A different prevalence of dyslexia is often
    cited for boys and girls ratios differ between
    21 and 91 more boys suffering from dyslexia.
  • Women perform significantly better than man on
    reading related tests (for instance Marlow et
    al. 2001)

5
This study Materials
  • Three, newly developed reading-related tests for
    students who have just started secondary school
    (authors Henneman, Kleijnen, Smits)
  • silent-reading task three minutes of silent
    reading.
  • a spelling task 12 sentences composed of words
    with increasing complexity (het wonderlijke
    weer, the surprising weather).
  • Writing task copying a sentence as often as
    possible in two minutes (cf., Hatcher, Snowling,
    Griffith, 2002).

6
This studyParticipants
Boys Girls Total
Without dyslexia certificate 1260 1231 2491
With dyslexia certificate 113 52 165
Total 1373 1283 2656
7
Results of the reading-related tasks of all
participants reading task
8
Results of the reading-related tasks of all
participants spelling task
9
Results of the reading-related tasks of all
participants writing task
10
Conclusions
  • Significant differences between girls and boys
    and between schooltypes for all tree tasks
  • Girls performance is better than boys for all
    three tasks writing, spelling and reading
  • Except for spelling and reading at VWO type (no
    difference)
  • All three reading related tasks differentiate
    between schooltypes
  • VWO gtHAVO gtVMBO

11
Comparison of participants with and without
dyslexia certificate
Mean Performances With dyslexia certificate Without dyslexia certificate Differences between means p lt .001
Score on Writing 191 (n 132) 220 (n 2096) s
Score on Reading 1075 (n151) 1485 (n2377) s
Score on Spelling 77 (n162) 87 (n2482) s
12
Performance of boys and girls with and without
dyslexia certificate
Mean performances Girls without Girls with dyslexia Boys without Boys with dyslexia
Score on writing 224 197 210 183
Score on reading 1526 1089 1418 1044
Score on spelling 89 77 86 78
13
Conclusions
  • Significant differences between the performance
    of boys and girls without dyslexia certificate
  • Same difference in performance for writing the
    difference is 14, but not significant (due to
    smaller group)
  • less differences between performance of boys and
    girls for reading (mean difference of 45) and
    spelling (1).

14
Mean score comparisons on all three tasks between
low-performing girls without dyslexia and girls
with dyslexia
Performance of girls (N1353) With dyslexia certificate Without dyslexia certificate Differences between means p lt .05
Mean Score on Writing lt197 165 (n211.5) 170 (n18814) n.s.
Mean Score on Reading lt1089 786 (n231.6) 935 (n13910.2) s.
Mean Score on Spelling lt77 50 (n131) 39 (n55 4) n.s.
15
Mean score comparisons on all three tasks between
low-performing boys without dyslexia and boys
with dyslexia
Performance of boys (N1360) With dyslexia certificate Without dyslexia certificate Differences between means p lt .05
Mean Score on Writing lt 183 147 (n37 2.7) 157 (n26919.7) s.
Mean Score on Reading lt1044 787 (n51 3.8) 875 (n20915.4) s.
Mean Score on Spelling lt 78 61 (n53 3.9) 52 (n18813.8) n.s.
16
Discussion issues
  • To interpret these data, three issues arise
  • What are the implications for the classification
    of dyslexia? Do we need separate norms for boys
    and girls in secondary education to obtain a
    valid comparison with the standard group?
  • Since performance at the beginning of primary
    grade hardly differs between boys and girls, we
    wonder at what age reading-related performance of
    boys and girls starts to diverge?
  • Do girls gain more from intervention than boys?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com