ISMS WG Status 62th IETF Minneapolis March 7, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ISMS WG Status 62th IETF Minneapolis March 7, 2005

Description:

The EUSM architecture would be the right direction for the ISMS WG. ... draft-ietf-isms-proposal-comparoson-00. 3) Discussion of WG direction (30 min) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: MartinSti3
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ISMS WG Status 62th IETF Minneapolis March 7, 2005


1
ISMS WG Status62th IETFMinneapolisMarch 7, 2005
  • Goal Creating a security model for SNMPv3
    that will meet the security and
    operational needs of network administrators.
  • Discussion isms_at_ietf.org Admin isms-request_at_ops
    .ietf.org (in body subscribe)

2
Proposals
  • SBSM - Session-Based Security Model
  • draft-hardaker-snmp-session-sm-03.txt
  • EUSM - External User Security Model
  • draft-kaushik-snmp-external-usm-01.txt
  • updated to version -02
  • TLSM - Transport Layer Security Model
  • draft-schoenw-snmp-tlsm-01.txt

3
Proposal Evaluation
  • Evaluation team
  • Uri Blumenthal, Lakshminath Dondeti,
  • Randy Presuhn, Eric Rescorla
  • Comparison of Proposals for Integrated Security
    Models for SNMP
  • draft-ietf-isms-proposal-comparison-00
  • Basic statement no clear winner
  • Recommendation
  • The EUSM architecture would be the right
    direction for the ISMS WG.
  • However, a number of aspects of the EUSM design
    need moderate to substantial revision.

4
Recent Discovery
  • RFC 3748
  • EAP was designed for use in network access
    authentication, where IP layer connectivity may
    not be available. Use of EAP for other purposes,
    such as bulk data transport, is NOT RECOMMENDED.
  • The EUSM proposal violates this recommendation

5
Proposal 1 for Changing Work Plan
  • Have a new submission deadline soon
  • End of April?
  • Have a second evaluation of revised or new
    proposals
  • Do we need a new team?
  • 2nd Evaluation report before summer break
  • End of June?
  • Charter discussion at IETF 63
  • Re-charter until end of August

6
Proposal 2 for Changing Work Plan
  • Discuss architecture first
  • Consensus by end of April?
  • Charter discussion at IETF 63
  • Re-charter until August

7
Recommendations for revised/new solution proposals
  • Consider recommendations given in the proposal
    comparison I-D
  • Clearly and explicitly describe your integration
    with at least one common security infrastructure
  • Avoid using EAP

8
Planned ISMS WG Agenda
  • 1) WG Status, Agenda bashing ( 5 min)
  • 2) Proposal Comparison (45 min)
  • - presentation of draft-ietf-isms-proposal-
    comparoson-00
  • 3) Discussion of WG direction (30 min)
  • - on which soluiton approach will the WG
    focis ist efforts?
  • 4) Charter discussion (45 min)
  • 5) Update of the EUSM proposal (optional) (20
    min)
  • - draft-kaushik-snmp-external-usm-02
  • 6) Wrap up ( 5 min)
  • - action points, schedule

9
Revised ISMS WG Agenda
  • 1) WG Status, Agenda bashing (10 min)
  • 2) Proposal Comparison (30 min)
  • - presentation of draft-ietf-isms-proposal-
    comparoson-00
  • 3) Weaknesses of USM (15 min)
  • 4) Update of the EUSM proposal (optional) (15
    min)
  • - draft-kaushik-snmp-external-usm-02
  • 5) Discussion of procedure (20
    min)
  • 6) Wrap up ( 5 min)
  • - action points, schedule

10
ISMS Milestones
  • Apr 04  
  • Cut-off date for internet-drafts to be submitted
    to the working group for consideration as a
    proposed solution
  • Jun 04
  • Proposal evaluation and recommendation
  • Aug 05
  • Working group will recharter to include
    publication goals or shutdown if no consensus on
    a technical direction is reached by this time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com