Social%20Class%20and%20education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Social%20Class%20and%20education

Description:

Andy Walker Learning Online. 2. Some key facts about working class children ... Douglas' counting of parental visits to parents evenings is seen as unscientific. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:187
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: educatio85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social%20Class%20and%20education


1
Social Class and education
  • The Facts of disadvantage

2
Some key facts about working class children
  • Even when compared to middle class children with
    the same IQ, working class children are
  • less likely to be found in nursery schools
  • more likely to be poor readers when they start
    school
  • more likely to be in low sets and streams in
    secondary school
  • more likely to underachieve at GCSE and A level
  • less likely to go to University
  • more likely to leave school early
  • more likely to be suspended and excluded

3
Explanations Intelligence
  • Sociologists and psychologists such as Eysenck
    suggests that working class children have lower
    innate intelligence that middle class children.
  • Intelligence is inherited from parents which
    explains the childs educational performance and
    the lowly social status of their parents.
  • Problems
  • Intelligence is a cultural construct
  • Most regard factors such as poverty and time
    spent in school as far more meaningful than raw
    IQ scores

4
Explanations Cultural Deprivation
  • Working class culture viz. parental attitudes,
    child rearing practice and language used, is to
    blame for underachievement.
  • JWB Douglas argued working class parents do not
    value education.
  • Bernstein argued the restricted code of the
    working class handicapped childrens language
    development. Education being delivered in the
    elaborated code of middle class standard English.
  • The Newsons suggested middle class parents are
    measurably more child centred than the working
    class.

5
Criticisms of Cultural Deprivation Theory
  • It fails to consider material deprivation.
    Factors such as poverty are arguably far more
    significant working class children do not get
    access to nursery education or expensive
    educational toys and games.
  • It has a rather suspect methodology e.g. Douglas
    counting of parental visits to parents evenings
    is seen as unscientific.

6
Explanations Marxism
  • School is seen as a middle class institution run
    by middle class teachers using middle class
    language and perpetuating middle class values,
    attitudes and power.
  • Marxists such as Bourdieu suggest that working
    class pupils lack the cultural capital to achieve
    in such an environment.
  • Marxists see school as part of the state
    machinery which is designed to condition the
    working class to failure and drudgery. Working
    class failure is therefore guaranteed as this is
    one of the systems desired outcomes.

7
ExplanationsThe interactionist view
  • Interactionist sociologists us labelling theory
    to explain working class underachievement.
  • Negative labels of the working class child are
    constructed by middle class teachers which are in
    turn communicated to pupils who internalise them
    and become self fulfilling prophecies of failure.
  • Positive labels are communicated to the middle
    class child as ideal pupils who work hard and
    keep quiet they too become self fulfilling
    prophecies this time successful ones.

8
Examples of labelling theory
  • Rosenthal and Jacobsen self fulfilling
    prophecy.
  • Keddie who characterised streaming as
    institutionalised labelling. Top sets are treated
    more favourably whilst bottom sets are blamed for
    their own failure.
  • Hargreaves who studies the counter sub- cultures
    that pupils develop in response to labelling

9
Criticisms of labelling theory
  • It ignores important structural factors such as
    class inequality.
  • It underestimates counter school culture. Paul
    Willis claims working class boys choose to fail
    because school achievement isnt valued in their
    culture.
  • There is little empirical evidence to back it up.

10
Important point to note
  • Intelligence, cultural deprivation theory and
    labelling theory have also all been used to
    attempt to explain the relative underachievement
    of certain ethnic groups.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com