Title: Aeroelastic Stability and Control of Large Wind Turbines
1Aeroelastic Stability and Control of Large Wind
Turbines
STABCON
2STABCON Aero-Servo-Elasticity of wind turbines
3PRVS and ASR turbines NM80 prototype in Tjæreborg
4Investigated topics for passive instability
suppression
- Effect of airfoil aerodynamics
- Smooth stall characteristics increases the
damping - Effect of flapwise edgewise frequency
coincidence - Coincidence creates a flapwise edgewise
whirling coupling - Effect of flapwise edgewise whirling coupling
- Coupled whirling modes share aeroelastic
damping - Effect of torsional blade stiffness
- Low torsional blade stiffness may lead to flutter
- Can whirl flutter happen on a wind turbine?
- Yes for extremely low tilt/yaw stiffness of
nacelle support - Edgewise/torsion coupling for large flapwise
deflections - Downwind flapwise bending may increase edgewise
damping - Effect of yaw error on damping from wake
- The destabilizing effect of dynamic inflow
changes slightly by yaw errors - Effect of generator dynamics
- Damping effects depend on generator type and
control strategy
5Effect of edgewise/flapwise whirling coupling
PRVS
6Effect of edgewise/flapwise whirling coupling
ASR
7Effect of large flapwise deflection PRVS
downwind pre-bend
upwind pre-bend
8Effect of large flapwise deflection ASR
downwind pre-bend
upwind pre-bend
9Investigated topics for integrated aeroelastic
control
- Power/speed controller issues
- Speed controller frequency placed away from
aeroelatic frequencies - Active drivetrain damping by feedback to
generator torque - Drivetrain loads reduced by up to 10
- Active drivetrain damping reduces pitch activity
- Active tower damping by feedback to collective
pitch - Efficiency depend on the aeroelastic damping of
the tower modes - Cyclic pitch for flapwise blade and tilt/yaw load
reductions - Efficiency depend on the ratio of stochastic and
deterministic loading - most relative efficiency for low turbulence
- Too high feedback gains may lead to
whirl-flutter-like instability - Are there conflicting objectives of combined
controllers? - No, if there is a sufficient frequency separation
of control actions
10Cyclic pitch actions reduce flapwise blade loads
11Cyclic pitch actions reduce tilt/yaw shaft and
tower loads
12Cyclic pitch actions affect the damping of tower
modes
13Active tower damping and cyclic pitch can be
combined
14Guidelines available from www.risoe.dk
R-1575
R-1577