Title: X.L. Zhang, F. Zimmermann
1EOS- lifetime and losses vs chromaticity11/26/200
2
X.L. Zhang, F. Zimmermann
2end-of-store study on 11/26 reduce CH,V by 10
units in steps of -1
no effect on intensity or loss, some increase in
H Schottky power at 10 sudden instability and
beam loss quenched the Tevatron
3- some related informations
- quench appeared to have been caused by p-bars
- (signature of pbar quench at F48, by Dean et
al.) - on November 4 Xiaolong had scanned both Ch and
Cv - (independently) by 24 and 20 units without
problems - but a quench occurred at DCv -21
- in p-bar removal study on November 17, proton
- chromaticities were measured as Ch13, Cv16
- (i.e., lower in H)
- according to Tanajis calculation the
0-amplitude - chromaticities of p-bars are lower by 10 and
1 units - compared with protons (at 3s the differences
are 6 and - -3)
if we trust these numbers the nominal pbar
chromat. is Ch3 only, which was dropped to 7
in the course of the study - no wonder the beam
became unstable!
4absolute changes were certainly larger on
November 4, but
5perhaps we cannot deduce from the two successful
pink curves that the brown one should be stable
6circumstantial observation that the sextupole
feeddowns (S5F1A-S5D3A) were 50 different on
the two occasions, namely Nov 4 4.2
- 4.3 Nov 17/26 6.7
why were they different, and does this matter
for the p-bar stability?