Programmable MiniBlinds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Programmable MiniBlinds

Description:

Motor selection driven by size and holding torque: ... Mark S. Birrttella, Robert R. Marley, Keith D. Nootbaar, 'Design Techniques for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: craig142
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Programmable MiniBlinds


1
Programmable Mini-Blinds
  • Senior Design II
  • Presented to Dr. Joe Picone
  • April 29, 2004

2
Team Members
3
Current Mini-blind Problems
  • Hard for elderly / disabled people to operate
  • Catch mechanism
  • Wand
  • Uneven lowering
  • High window installations
  • Strangulation hazards
  • The wand breaks easily
  • Appearance

4
Programmable Mini-Blinds Adv.
  • All blind movements are now automated
  • Catch mechanism is eliminated
  • Has controlled lowering
  • Easily applied to all window heights
  • No more dangerous cords and wands
  • Cleaner appearance

5
SDII - Major Design Constraints
6
Hardware Component Diagram
Mini-Blinds Housing
User Interface Housing
Power Supply
PIC
Protective Switches
LEDs
Motor Controller
Interface Buttons
Bus Circuitry
Max 232
Motor 1
Motor 2
7
Motor Design Issues 1st Semester
  • Motor selection driven by size and holding
    torque
  • Initial motor design required a direct torque
    output and required the use of a power off
    electronic brake to prevent power loss movement

Required Force to keep blinds stationary 10 lbs
3/8
Holding torque force x moment arm
10 lb x 3/16 in
30 oz-in
8
1st Semester Motor Choice
  • Lin Engineering 4118M-30
  • 45 oz-in holding torque
  • 1.8 step angle
  • Size 42x42x40 mm
  • 0.4 Amps/phase (13.24 VDC)
  • Cost - 67.50 each
  • Worm/worm gear combo
  • 69 per motor
  • Combination worked but was too expensive

9
Motor Design Issues 2nd Semester
  • Servo vs. Stepper???
  • Worm/worm gear ratio investigated
  • Motor speed control needed improvement
  • Possibly reduce the voltage requirements
  • Major cost reduction needed
  • Motor shape investigated
  • Motor placement studied

10
Motor Design Issues 2nd Semester
  • Motor selection driven by price, size, and
    holding torque

Required Force to keep blinds stationary 5 lbs
Holding torque force x moment arm
5 lb x 11/16 in
55 oz-in
11/8
11
2nd Semester Motor Choice
  • Danaher Motion 55M048D2U
  • 14.5 oz-in holding torque
  • 7.5 step angle
  • Size 79x55x25.7mm
  • 0.4 Amps/phase (12 VDC)
  • Cost - 18.90 per motor
  • Plastic worm/worm gear combo
  • 12.62 total for both motors
  • Round design makes for easier mounting

12
Hardware Component Diagram
Mini-Blinds Housing
User Interface Housing
Power Supply
PIC
Protective Switches
LEDs
Motor Controller
Interface Buttons
Bus Circuitry
Max 232
Motor 1
Motor 2
13
Motor Controller Update
  • We decided to stick with the S100 motor
    controller
  • Has preprogrammed instructions
  • Separate power bus for motors
  • Will fit in our blind housing without any
    modifications
  • Has testing software

14
Motor Controller Calculations
  • Vertical speed prediction test
  • Actual measured speed 0.3 in/sec
  • Shading pps calculation

15
Hardware Component Diagram
Mini-Blinds Housing
User Interface Housing
Power Supply
PIC
Protective Switches
LEDs
Motor Controller
Interface Buttons
Bus Circuitry
Max 232
Motor 1
Motor 2
16
Lever Protective Switches
  • Protects the motor from
  • raising the blinds too far
  • opening or closing the blinds too far
  • SDII Fixed floating ground problem
  • Also, used for automatic calibration

17
Hardware Component Diagram
Mini-Blinds Housing
User Interface Housing
Power Supply
PIC
Protective Switches
LEDs
Motor Controller
Interface Buttons
Bus Circuitry
Max 232
Motor 1
Motor 2
18
Chosen PIC for User Interface
  • PIC 16F877A
  • 33 I/O Pins (we use 16)
  • Program Memory - 14.3Kb (we use 10.725 Kb)
  • 368 Bytes of Data RAM (we use 92 Bytes)
  • UART Serial Communication

19
User Interface PIC Requirements
  • Determine what instructions to send to motor
    controller
  • Send instructions to the motor controller using
    RS232 communications protocol
  • Store programmed actions set by user
  • Interpret buttons that are pressed during
    movement or program mode

20
MAX232
  • Steps signals into and out of microprocessor to
    appropriate voltages.
  • Main use communication between microcontroller
    and motor controller

21
Software Design Section
  • Power Saving Code
  • Loops are used to contain different modes of
    operation
  • Jumps are used to switch between modes

22
Hardware Component Diagram
Mini-Blinds Housing
User Interface Housing
Power Supply
PIC
Protective Switches
LEDs
Motor Controller
Interface Buttons
Bus Circuitry
Max 232
Motor 1
Motor 2
23
Power Supply and Bus Circuitry
24
SDII Current Drain Slide
Our power supply outputs 1.0 A
25
Hardware Component Diagram
Mini-Blinds Housing
User Interface Housing
Power Supply
PIC
Protective Switches
LEDs
Motor Controller
Interface Buttons
Bus Circuitry
Max 232
Motor 1
Motor 2
26
Control Box
27
PC Board Evolution
3.6 x 3.6
2.5 x 3.8
Decreased board size by 26.7
28
Cost Analysis Comparison
29
Houston Automated Shades MLS-40
  • Automated but has no programmability in base
    model
  • Their cost - 501.00
  • Our cost - 202.08
  • We offer more functionality at a lower cost!!!

30
SDII vs. SD1 System Testing
31
Design Constraints Check List
32
Design Issues
  • Worm/Worm gear alignment
  • DOA motor
  • Microcontroller port communications

33
Our Design Before Motor DOA
34
Acknowledgements
  • Jesus Christ
  • Dr. Herb Ginn
  • Dr. Joe Picone
  • Jonathan Heath
  • Jordan Goulder
  • Balaji Venkatesan
  • William Brammer
  • Mark Shorter
  • Bill Buchanan
  • Dr. Bob Reese
  • Mr. David Tillman
  • Mr. Bobby Sutton
  • Dr. Bill Jones

35
Any Questions
???
36
References
  • 1 Rod F. Wille, The Business Case for Building
    Green, Development, Winter 2003
  • 2 U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission,
    Children Can Strangle in Window Covering Cords,
    Consumer Product Safety Alert, March 2003.
  • 3 Gail Gabriel, How Safe is Your House?,
    Good Housekeeping, Oct2001, Vol. 233, Issue 4
  • 4 For Rheumatoid Arthritis, Combination of
    Drugs is Best, Drug Week, March 2004.
  • 5 Barbara Tunick, Joint Endeavor, Vegetarian
    Times, Issue 319, March 2004.
  • 6 The Connecticut Department of Public Health,
    Arthritis at a Glance,http//www.dph.state.ct.us
    /BCH/HEI/arthritis20page.html
  • 7 Holzhauer, CHOOSING AND SAFELY OPERATING
    POWERED HOISTS, Plant Engineering, Vol. 54,
    Issue 1, January 2000
  • 8 Covington, QA, Electronics Now, Vol. 70,
    Issue 11, November 1999.
  • 9 Equipment Reports, Electronics Now, Vol.
    65, Issue 8, August 1994.
  • 10 Jack Dowell, Stepper Motors, Astronomy,
    Vol. 20, Issue 11, November 1992
  • 11 Carl Becker, Todd Zalud, Packing Power into
    Worm Gears, Machine Design, Vol. 70, Issue 9,
    May 1998.
  • 12 Paul Merrion, Put to the test, Crain's
    Chicago Business, Vol. 26, Issue 32, August 11,
    2003
  • 13 Mark S. Birrttella, Robert R. Marley, Keith
    D. Nootbaar, Design Techniques for IC Voltage
    Regulators without p-n-p Transitors, IEEE
    Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol. SC-22,
    Issue 1, February 1987
  • 14 PIC16F87XA Data Sheet, Microchip, October
    2003.
  • 15 Max 232 Data Sheet, Dallas Semiconductor,
    November 2003.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com