FHS PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

FHS PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

Description:

Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary General. 2002 at http://untreaty.un.org ... multilateral treaty-making 1864-1914. rise of international ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: catherine59
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FHS PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW


1
FHS PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
  • THE LAW OF TREATIES
  • Catherine Redgwell
  • Reader in Public International Law
  • St. Peters College
  • catherine.redgwell_at_spc.ox.ac.uk

2
BASIC READING
  • 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties
    (VCLT)
  • Harris, Cases and Materials on International Law
    (5th ed., 1998), Ch. 10 or Dixon and
    McCorquodale, Cases and Materials on
    International Law, (4th ed., 2003), Ch. 3
  • Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law
    (6th ed., 2003), Ch. XXV or Shaw, International
    Law (5th ed., 2003), Ch. 16 or Dixon, Textbook on
    International Law (4th ed., 2000), Ch. 3

3
FURTHER REFERENCE
  • Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (2000)
  • Jennings and Watts, Oppenheim's International Law
    (1992), Vol 1, Parts 2-4, Ch.14
  • Sinclair, The Vienna Convention on the Law of
    Treaties (2nd ed., 1984)
  • Reuter, Introduction to the Law of Treaties
    (2nd ed., 1995)
  • Rosenne, Developments in the Law of Treaties
    1945-1986 (1989)
  • Klabbers, The Concept of Treaty in International
    Law (1996)
  • Klabbers and Lefeber, eds., Essays on the Law of
    Treaties (1998)
  • Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the
    Secretary General
  • 2002 at http//untreaty.un.org
  • For a list of the current international
    agreements for which the UK is depositary, see
    http//www.fco.gov.uk/directory/treaty.asp

4
LECTURE OUTLINE
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Sources of the Law of Treaties
  • 3. What is a Treaty?
  • 4. Making Treaties Conclusion and Entry into
    Force
  • 5. Reservations
  • 6. Interpretation
  • 7. Amendment and Modification
  • 8. Grounds for Challenge
  • 9. Termination

5
I. INTRODUCTION
  • Treaties in modern international relations
  • date modern treaty law from the Congress of
    Vienna in 1815 where there appeared for the first
    time the idea that a treaty which is binding
    upon different States by the same terms
    constitutes a single legal instrument (Reuter)

6
  • multilateral treaty-making 1864-1914
  • rise of international organisations and their
    role
  • League of Nations United Nations role as
    depositary and initiator of treaty-negotiations
    (e.g. 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea)

7
  • Treaties now an essential and ubiquitous
    instrument in international relations (Cf VCLT
    preamble)
  • particular importance in fields such as human
    rights (ICCPR), environmental protection (FCCC
    CBD), international trade law (WTO/GATT)

8
  • Enhanced support for rule of law
  • "support for the rule of law would be enhanced
    if countries signed and ratified international
    treaties and conventions (Millennium Report
    (A/54/2000), UN Secretary-General)
  • Treaty signature/ratification events

9
  • Treaties as a source of international law
  • Article 38(1)(a) of the Statute of the ICJ
    provides that in deciding in accordance with
    international law such disputes as are submitted
    to it, the Court shall apply "international
    Conventions, whether general or particular,
    establishing rules expressly recognised by the
    contesting States.

10
  • "The order in which the sources of international
    law are enumerated in the Statute of the
    International Court of Justice is, essentially,
    in accordance both with correct legal principle
    and with the character of international law as a
    body of rules based on consent to a degree higher
    than is law within the State. The rights and
    duties of States are determined, in the first
    instance, by their agreement as expressed in
    treaties - just as, in the case of individuals
    their rights are specifically determined by any
    contract which is binding upon them. When a
    controversy arises between two or more States
    with regard to a matter regulated by a treaty, it
    is natural that the parties should invoke and
    that the adjudicating agency should apply, in the
    first instance, the provisions of the treaty in
    question." (Lauterpacht, 1970)

11
TREATIES ON TREATIES
  • 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (in
    force on 27 January 1980 and presently has 94
    Parties)
  • 1978 Vienna Convention on Succession of States in
    Respect of Treaties (in force 1996)
  • 1986 Convention on the Law of Treaties between
    States and International Organisations or between
    International Organisations (not in force)

12
2. SOURCES OF THE LAW OF TREATIES
  • Scope of VCLT covers traditional topics but not
    exhaustive
  • VCLT General Law or Progressive Development?

13
  • "A glance at the headings to the various Parts of
    the Convention quickly reveals that it covers all
    the topics traditionally regarded as falling
    within the framework of the law of treaties -
    that is to say, the conclusion and entry into
    force of treaties (including reservations), the
    observance, application and interpretation of
    treaties, the amendment and modification of
    treaties, and the invalidity, termination and
    suspension of operation of treaties. The
    Convention in addition lays down procedural rules
    concerning depositaries, notifications,
    corrections and registration." (Sinclair, 1984)

14
  • Definition of treaty Art. 2(1)(a)
  • only written agreements between States
  • cil governs matters outwith VCLT (preamble, 8th
    indent)
  • What isnt regulated? Chiefly effects of war on
    treaties succession (1986 treaty) state
    responsibility (cf. Pt. 9, Gabicikovo-Nagymaros
    Dam Dispute)

15
  • Article 3 VCLT (exclusions)
  • Article 5 VCLT constituent instruments are
    covered (e.g. UN Charter)
  • A law of treaties or lawS of treaties? One set of
    rules applicable to all? Cf case study of
    reservations to human rights treaties (Pt 5 below)

16
Codification or Progressive Development?
  • the more precise formulation and systemisation
    of rules of international law in fields where
    there already has been extensive State practice,
    precedent and doctrine(ILC Statute)
  • the preparation of draft Conventions on subjects
    which have not yet been regulated by
    international law or in regard to which the law
    has not yet sufficiently developed in the
    practice of States (ILC Statute)

17
  • VCLT contains elements of both codification (of
    existing CIL) and of progressive development
    (preamble, 7th indent)
  • Article 9(2) Articles 19-23 Articles 40-41
    Articles 42-72 all contain elements of
    progressive development and hence only bind
    States Parties UNLESS crystallise in CIL

18
Some Terminology..
  • Article 2(1)(g) State is bound by the treaty
    only when it has both given its consent to be
    bound AND the treaty has entered into force -
    only then may it be called a Contracting Party
  • Contracting State signifies consent but term
    applicable whether or not treaty is in force

19
Examples of pre-existing CIL codified in the VCLT
  • Fundamental change of circumstances (Article 62)
    (Fisheries Jurisdiction Case 1973)
  • termination and breach (Namibia Advisory Opinion
    1971)
  • Articles 31-33 on treaty interpretation (Beagle
    Channel Arbitration)

20
Interaction between treaty and custom
  • In so far as this contention is based on the
    view that Article 6 of the Convention has had the
    influence, and produced the effect, described, it
    clearly involves treating that Article as a
    norm-creating provision which has generated a
    rule which, while only conventional or
    contractual in origin, has since passed into the
    general corpus of international law, and is now
    accepted as such by the opinio juris, so as to
    have become binding even for countries which have
    never, and do not, become parties to the
    Convention. There is no doubt that this process
    is a perfectly possible one and does from time to
    time occur it constitutes indeed one of the
    recognised methods by which new rules of
    customary international law may be formed. At
    the same time, this result is not lightly to be
    regarded as having been attained. (1969 NSCS
    Cases)

21
  • Cant bind 3d parties w/o their consent BUT 3d
    parties may be bound by the treaty rule if also
    reflected as a rule of CIL this possibility
    expressly preserved in Article 38 VCLT
  • e.g. Article 2(4) UN Charter also CIL 1986
    Nicaragua Case
  • influence of treaty negotiation on CIL norm
    crystallisation e.g. development of EEZ concept
    during LOSC negotitations

22
3. WHAT IS A TREATY?
  • Article 2(1)(a) VCLT definition
  • 1. BETWEEN STATES
  • 2. IN WRITTEN FORM
  • 3. GOVERNED BY INTERNATIONAL LAW
  • 4. SINGLE INSTRUMENT OR TWO OR MORE RELATED
    INSTRUMENTS
  • 5. WHATEVER ITS PARTICULAR DESIGNATION

23
Whatever its particular designation
  • Convention (1982 LOSC)
  • Treaty (e.g. of peace, extradition,etc.)
  • Agreement (e.g. cultural cooperation)
  • Exchange of Notes (Cameroon v Nigeria, ICJ, 10
    October 2002)
  • Protocols (to ICCPR Kyoto Protocol to 1992 FCCC)
  • Charter (e.g. UN Charter but not CERDS)

24
What is in a name? EFFECT is what counts.
  • Aegean Sea Continenal Shelf Case (1978) no rule
    of international law which might preclude a joint
    communique constituting an international
    agreement to submit a dispute to arbitration or
    judicial settlement
  • Qatar/Bahrain (1994) (status of 1990 Minutes as
    binding agreement notwithstanding alleged
    contrary intent)

25
  • Article 3 VCLT even if not in writing, does not
    necessarily deprive agreement of legal effect
  • Nuclear Tests Cases (1974) (unilateral
    declarations - oral not written undertakings yet
    nonetheless unilateral acts binding upon France)
    Role of intent here?
  • Frontier Dispute Case (1986) (intent key factor
    in depriving Presidential quip of legal effect)

26
  • One should probably distinguish the question
    whether oral statements, or unilateral
    declarations, create a legal obligation, from the
    question whether they constitute treaties or
    agreements (Jennings and Watts)
  • such statements governed by IL though not
    directly by the VCLT owing to the requirement of
    writing
  • exs of Nuclear Tests Cases (1974) and Eastern
    Greenland Case (1933)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com