Holbachs Hard Determinism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Holbachs Hard Determinism

Description:

Events E have as inevitable consequence Neurosis N, which in turn has as ... 2. Not all actions stem from unconscious neuroses, so we are not always unfree. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: ast4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Holbachs Hard Determinism


1
Holbachs Hard Determinism
  • Man is not a free agent in any one instant of
    his life.
  • because we are subject to the universal laws of
    nature as everything else is.
  • Yet, the common view is that we are free agents.

2
Holbachs justification of punishment
  • Holbach claims that this results from another
    mistake thinking that in order to punish persons
    for misdeeds they must have committed those acts
    freely.
  • Suggests that we justify punishment by its
    deterrent effect.

3
Hospers, Meaning and Free Will
  • Free act voluntary act?
  • this view does not tell us how to regard
    unpremeditated acts, e.g., acts from feeling or
    habitual actions
  • Free act act unhindered by compulsion?
  • Hospers holds that this means no acts are free.

4
Hospers psychoanalytic view of action
  • According to the psychoanalytic account, our
    actions are determined by forces within us that
    are beyond our control, and that were shaped by
    our infantile and childhood psychic development.
  • Hence we are internally compelled in all our
    actions.

5
Hospers argument against responsibility
  • P1. An occurrence over which we had no control is
    something we cannot be held responsible for.
  • P2. Events E, occurring during our babyhood, were
    events over which we had no control.
  • C1. Therefore events E were events which we
    cannot be held responsible for.

6
  • P3. But if there is something we cannot be held
    responsible for, neither can we be held
    responsible for something that inevitably results
    from it.
  • P4. Events E have as inevitable consequence
    Neurosis N, which in turn has as inevitable
    consequence Behavior B.
  • C2. Since N is the inevitable consequence of E
    and B is the inevitable consequence of N, B is
    the inevitable consequence of E.
  • C. Hence, not being responsible for E, we cannot
    be responsible for B.

7
Objections to Hospers
  • 1. It is unsound
  • P4 is based on an untenable psychological theory
  • the claim in P4 is too strong because it claims
    that neuroses are inevitable consequences of
    certain events
  • 2. Not all actions stem from unconscious
    neuroses, so we are not always unfree.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com