Title: INVESTMENT REFORM INDEX
1INVESTMENT REFORM INDEX
2Agenda
- Context and Objectives
- Approach and Process
- Differentiating Factors
- Organisation and Key Events
- Annex
3Investment Reform Index Context and Objectives
4Context
The Investment Reform Index and the Investment
Compact
5Objectives
The IRI is guided by four key objectives
Regional Collab-oration and Peer Review
Targeted Support in Imple-mentation
Public and Private Sector Involvement
Structured Evaluation
?
?
?
?
6Investment Reform Index Approach and Process
7Approach
The IRI measures implementation of reform in 10
key dimensions
Main focus of evaluation in 2006
Part of a separate process conducted in
cooperation with the EC in the framework of the
European Charter for Small Enterprises
8Approach
Each dimension is broken down into main
sub-dimensions Example Tax Policy Framework
9Approach
Each sub-dimension is broken down into core
indicators Example Tax Framework ? Tax
Administration
10Approach
Each indicator is broken down into levels of
reform Example Tax Framework ? Tax Administration
Note This table has been simplified for
presentation purposes each level of reform and
Best Practice example is fully detailed in the
actual IRI. 1Best Practice refers to a country,
usually in Central Europe or one of the Baltic
States, which has made significant reforms in
each indicator
11Process
Gathering information for scores will follow a
specific process Example Anti-Corruption
CET
Investment Compact
Private Sector
12Investment Reform Index Differentiating Factors
13Differentiating Factors
How the IRI is different from other indices
- Meta Index which incorporates existing work
already conducted by other organisations (e.g.,
World Banks Doing Business report). - Comprehensive evaluation of the investment
environment structured along ten key dimensions
in line with OECD standards. - Does not only measure but also provides guidance
on how to improve through best practices. - Focus on a very specific region where history,
culture and geography allow for more relevant
benchmarking between countries. - Tripartite participatory approach to evaluation
and measurement including government, private
sector, and the OECD. - Practical tool for governments to define
priorities for reform. - Living Index through the Investment Compact
website that will include an interactive space
where individuals and experts can comment on
particular aspects of the review.
14Investment Reform Index Organisation and Key
Events
15Organisation
The Investment Reform Index is organised to
involve all levels in the evaluation and input
process
- IC Core Team collects data and interviews OECD
Experts to establish a preliminary level of
progress for each country in each policy
dimension - Local consultants build from the first
measurement by collecting primary data in the
countries and conducting interviews with local
experts. The results analysed by the IC Core Team
and incorporated into the level of progress - The Private Sector and the Country Economic Team
evaluate the latest measure. This provides an
opportunity to step back and analyse the
measurements in a broader context. After
consultation mechanisms are complete, all parties
confirm a final measurement, which is published
Local Consultants Country Economic Team
IC Core Team
Private Sector
OECD Experts Local Experts
162005-2006 Key Events for the Investment Reform
Index
Key Events
17Annex Tripartite Review
18Annex
Tripartite Review of the Investment Reform Index
- Team of government experts, including the
Ministry of Economy, SME Agency/Development, IPA,
Ministry of Finance, Competition Authority, etc. - Propose annual targets and actions taking into
account input from the private sector and the
OECD - Conduct progress measurement
- Participate in peer reviews to validate results
- OECD IC Core Team
- Support CET and FIC in each country to set annual
targets and measure progress - Publish progress on targets twice a year
- Co-ordinate peer-review process
- Manage and update IRI