CTD Documents as Key Reviewer Tools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

CTD Documents as Key Reviewer Tools

Description:

A dump of module 3-5 data. No critical assessment. Lack of rationales ... www.diahome.org. Speaker Contact. Michelle_at_ctdquality.com. 978-356-0872. www.ctdquality.com ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: christoph682
Category:
Tags: ctd | com | documents | dump | key | reviewer | tools

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CTD Documents as Key Reviewer Tools


1
CTD Documents as Key Reviewer Tools
Michelle Herrera Foster, Ph.D. Senior Regulatory
Consultant
2
Objectives
  • Explore how Common Technical Document (CTD)
    documents can serve as key reviewer tools, to
    meet the needs of the agency reviewers and
    internal reviewers
  • Introduce key authoring tools and processes for
    submission-ready documents
  • Present the CTD as a development tool

3
ICH M4
NOT Part of the CTD
RegionalAdminInformation
Module 1
The CTD
QualityOverallSummary
4
What do the Reviewers Need?
  • Clear Conclusions
  • Backed-up Justifications
  • Risk Assessment
  • Data summaries
  • A framework for navigating the entire CTD
  • Reasons to approve your drug
  • Succinct, easy to review documents Summaries
    are key!

5
CTD Summaries Module 2
  • 2.3 The Quality Overall Summary
  • 2.4 The Nonclinical Overview
  • 2.5 The Nonclinical Summary
  • 2.6 The Clinical Overview
  • 2.7 The Clinical Summary

6
Module 2 Summaries
  • Summaries of Modules 3-5
  • Content linked to Modules 3-5
  • Summary of primary data, conclusions, rationales,
    and risk assessment
  • Content of one summary integrated with the others
  • Explanations of any guideline deviations

7
2.3 Quality Overall Summary
  • 40-80 pages
  • Gives the reviewer an understanding of how the
    formulation and manufacturing process affects
    product quality and performance (safety and
    efficacy).
  • Focuses on critical quality attributes (CQA) and
    critical manufacturing parameters
  • Risk-based and science-based rationales (GMP
    Initiative, ICH Q8-10)

8
2.4 Nonclinical Overview
  • 30 pages
  • Integrated critical assessment of the
    pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicology
    evaluations
  • Addresses
  • Adherence to guidance, justification of strategy
  • GLP status
  • Safety for intended clinical use
  • Safety of impurities

9
2.6 Nonclinical Written and Tabulated Summaries
  • 100 150 pages
  • Written summary of comprehensive factual synopsis
    of the nonclinical data
  • Tabulated summaries using table formats in ICH M4
    Safety

10
2.5 Clinical Overview
  • 30 pages
  • Critical analysis, succinct discussion, with
    conclusions and implications
  • Addresses
  • Strengths and limitations of study results
  • Benefits and risks of the drug
  • Support of prescribing information

11
2.7 Clinical Summary
  • 50 - 400 pages
  • Detailed factual summarization of the clinical
    information
  • Summarizes
  • Individual clinical study reports
  • Cross-study analyses
  • Postmarketing data
  • Table formats in ICH M4 Efficacy

12
Pitfalls of Summaries
  • A dump of module 3-5 data
  • No critical assessment
  • Lack of rationales
  • No integration with other summaries
  • Poor organization and presentation
  • Just a regulatory requirement

13
5 Keys for Summaries
  • To help us
  • Assist the preparation
  • Facilitate review
  • Expedite approval

14
Key 1Be Succinct
  • High-level data summaries and conclusions
  • Focus on key messages
  • Focus on critical attributes and parameters
  • Provide clear rationales
  • Provide useful context
  • Give the reviewers what they need to know to
    approve your product!

15
Key 2Provide Rationales
  • Justify study designs, methodology, deviations,
    and acceptance criteria
  • Reference agency agreements
  • Conclusions must have a logic trail
  • Dont wait for a deficiency question before
    providing justifications

16
Key 3Bottom Line Up Front (BLUF)
  • Conclusions First - Dont make the reviewer wade
    through paragraphs to find out the bottom line
  • Describe key issues and their resolutions
  • Address key deviations from guidance
  • Organize the information so that it is easy to
    follow and understand

17
Key 4Address key agency trends
  • New guidance
  • Recent approvals
  • New technologies
  • Risk-based review
  • Consider Question-Based Review, e.g. How was
    your product designed to meet your defined
    critical attributes?

18
Key 5Link to Modules 3-5
  • Be consistent with modules 3-5
  • Cross-reference and hyperlink to modules 3-5
  • Make it easy for your reviewers to find the data
    supporting key messages in the summaries

19
CTD Summaries asKey Reviewer Tools
  • To expedite marketing approval
  • Management approval of the bottom line
  • Development Plan, TPP, strategy
  • Pre-meeting package
  • Gap analysis
  • Project management, Submission tracking
  • Enhanced cross-functional communication

20
Key CTD Needs and Tools
Succinct, Key Messages CTD Summaries
Management Review CTD Summaries
Clinical to Marketing CTD-Ready Docs
Ease of authoring CTD Templates
Project Management CTD Mapping
Communication CTD Team
Lessons Learned CTD Team
21
CTD-Ready Reports
Key results, conclusions
For QOS
Summary
Summary of methods
Module 3 data
Body of Report
Figures, graphs
Discussion
Raw data
Appendices
GMP Info
May not be submitted, on file
Protocols
22
Conclusions
  • CTD Summaries are key tools for agency review
  • Summaries can be the basis for internal planning,
    review, and tracking
  • Summaries should assess risk and provide
    scientific rationales
  • CTD-ready documents enhance efficiency throughout
    development
  • Meeting the reviewers needs will help you meet
    your own needs, i.e. approval!

23
Speaker Contact
  • Michelle_at_ctdquality.com
  • 978-356-0872
  • www.ctdquality.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com