Title: WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY:
1WOMEN AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
- A SEVEN YEAR LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF YOUNG WOMEN
FROM MIDDLE GRADES INTO COLLEGE
Sarah Berenson, Mladen Vouk, Joan Michael, Paula
Greenspon, Axelle Person North Carolina State
University
2OVERVIEW
- Study follows 174 high achieving girls in 3
cohorts of Girls on Track1 over 5 years - Initially funded to study HS girls persistence
on the fast math track - Now funded to study girls interests in IT
careers.2
1NSF Grant 9813902, Program for Gender Equity 2
NSF Grant 0204222, IT Workforce Program
3DEFINITIONS
- High Achieving Girls selected by their teachers
to take Algebra 1 in seventh or eighth grade. - Fast Math Track Pre-Calculus by 11th grade,
Calculus in 12th grade - IT Careers Computer Science, Computer
Engineering, Electrical Engineering
4ASSUMPTIONS
- High achieving girls beginning algebra 1 in
middle school will persist in the study of
advanced mathematics in high school. - High achieving girls who stay on the fast math
track through high school are good candidates for
IT careers. - There exists a model of intellectual, social, and
personal factors that explains girls math
persistence and IT career interests.
5METHOD OF INQUIRY GROUNDED THEORY
- An iterative process of collecting and analyzing
data to find relationships/patterns - Mixed methods of data collection and analysis
(Creswell, 2003) - Generating propositions and testing them in the
iterative process (Creswell, 1998) - Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and
research design Choosing among five traditions.
Thousand Oaks, CA Sage. - Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design
Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.
6PREVIOUS PROPOSITIONS
- Proportional reasoning is related to algebra 1
achievement (Clark Berenson, 2000) - High achieving girls have high expectations, are
confident, and feel supported by the families and
teachers (Howe Berenson, 2003) - High achieving girls confidence increases after
taking algebra 1(Longest Berenson, 2001) - Proportional reasoning is related to algebra and
geometry achievement (Longest, Person,
Berenson,Vouk, Michael 2003)
7SUBJECTS OF STUDY
- Cohort 1 - 1999 are now juniors and seniors in
high school (n40). - Cohort 2 - 2000 are sophomores and juniors (n65)
- Cohort 3 - 2001 are freshmen and sophomores
(n69) - Represent 24 public middle schools, 8 public high
schools, and 10 private schools in Central North
Carolina - 130 /- records considered in the data analysis
8EVIDENCE
- Proportional Reasoning Scores
- Minnesota Talented Youth Mathematics Program
Attitude Measure - State Tests Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2
- PSAT Math
- PSAT Verbal
- Math Courses Elected (On Track)
- IT Telephone Interviews of Cohort 1
9ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
- Of 119 girls, 83 are on track to take calculus
by their senior year - Cohort 1 n 24/33 80 on track
- Cohort 2 n 38/42 90 on track
- Cohort 3 n 37/44 84 on track
- Of 20 girls taking algebra in 7th grade, 100
are on track to take Calculus by grade 11.
10ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
Is there a relationship between proportional
reasoning and mathematics achievement over time?
SAS Correlation
Pearson Correlation Coefficients, p-values, and n
for 3 Cohorts
- Cohort Alg 1 Geom Alg 2 PSAT-M
PSAT-V - 1999 .74 .58
.53 .66 .70 - lt .0001 lt .0007 lt.004
lt .0003 lt .0001 - n28 n30
n28 n26 n26 - 2000 .37 .20
.59 .45 .16 - lt .007 ns
lt .007 lt .009 ns - n52 n42
n26 n33 n33 - 2001 .47 .30
- lt .008 ns
- n31 n37
11ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
What are high achieving HS seniors and juniors
attitudes towards math? 39 telephone interviews
- Expressed confidence in math ability
n21 - Had a great math teacher
n8 - Enjoyed challenge in math
n7 - Liked math
n5 - Used fun to describe math
n4 - Felt nervous about next math class
n5 - Thought math was difficult/hard
n3 - Didnt like math because of teacher n2
12ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
How many high achieving girls did not take
computer science in HS? Why or Why not? 39
telephone interviews
- 33 had taken no HS computer science courses
- No interest in computers
(n16) - Schedule conflicts with other electives
(n6) - Schedule conflict with other AP classes
(n3) - Not tied to career interests or college
acceptance (n2) - Courses not offered (i.e. private)
(n2) - Computers dont like me (n1)
- Waste of time. (n1)
- Computer/enrichment classes outside of HS (n2)
- Only 1 of 6 taking HS CS enjoyed the course(s)
- Java was very difficult (n2)
13ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
What are high achieving girls career interests
in their senior or junior year ? multiple
choices represented
- Juniors Seniors Total
- Medicine 10 11 21
- Science/Math 3 8 11
- Technology 0 0 0
- Engineering 0 0
0 - Other 12 17 29
- Undecided 3 1
4 - business 8
14SUMMARY NEW PROPOSITIONS
- A majority of high achieving girls taking
algebra 1 in MS will take calculus in HS. - Proportional reasoning for 11-12 yr. olds is
related to HS math achievement. - Most HS high achieving girls feel confident about
their math abilities. - High achieving girls do not appear to choose HS
computer science courses. - High achieving HS girls are not interested in IT
or other engineering careers.
15TESTING NEW PROPOSITIONS in 2004-05
- On Track Data from Cohort 2 (2004-05 seniors
and juniors) - Proportional Reasoning/AchievementData from
Cohort 3 (2004-05 juniors and sophomores) - Confidence Data from Cohort 2
- HS Computer Science Electives Data from Cohort
2 - Careers Data from Cohort 2
16ASKING NEW QUESTIONS IN 2004-05
- What are the academic characteristics of young
women and men selecting IT majors in college? - What are the proportional reasoning attributes
of second year IT majors? - What CS electives were taken in HS?
- What math electives were taken in HS?
- How confident are IT majors about IT careers?
- What characteristics contribute to persistence
in IT majors?