Title: Session 802: FAS123R
1Session 802 FAS123R
- Enrolled Actuaries Meeting
- March 28, 2007
Stacy Powell, FSA Vice President
2Table of Contents
- Cost, benefit, and value
- Stock-based compensation A different animal
- Option valuation
- SFAS 123R
- Why expense stock options?
- Evolution of stock-based compensation accounting
- FAS 123R expense development
- Deferred Tax Accounting
- Diluted earnings per share impact
- Modifications of equity awards
- Current events
- QA
3Stock-Based Compensation Defined
- SFAS 123R definition
- Company stock provided to employees or
nonemployees in exchange for goods or services - Typical stock option plan design
- Strike price Grant date stock price
- Service-based vesting provision
- 25 per year over 4 years (graded vesting)
- 100 after 3 years (cliff vesting)
- Special provisions for termination, retirement,
etc. - Restricted stock is another common vehicle
- Compensatory Employee Stock Purchase Plans
(ESPPs) - Performance shares are gaining popularity
- Performance Conditions (internal performance
metrics) - Market Conditions (stock price)
4Stock-Based Compensation Benefit, Cost, and
Value
5Why Expense Stock Options?
- Why not? Common arguments
- Value is impossible to measure accurately
- Factored in to EPS dilution already
- Detrimental to start-ups and technology firms
- Non-cash expense
- Valuable form of compensation
- Costly to investors
6Option Valuation
- Value Intrinsic Value Time Value
- Intrinsic Value Stock Price Strike Price
- Time Value PV of expected additional gain
- Determination of time value
- Magnitude of gain Stock price forecast
- Timing of gain Expected exercise behavior
- Discount rate
7Option Valuation
- SFAS 123R requirements
- Discussed much more rigorously in Track 7 of this
Conference (see Stacy Powell for handouts) - Assumptions reasonably reflect a basis on which
the award would be exchanged - Model is based on financial economic theory and
generally applied in that field - Valuation reflects substantive characteristics of
the plan - Generally accepted models
- Black-Scholes formulas
- Cox Ross Rubinstein Binomial Model (CRR)
- Hull-White Binomial Models
- Custom Binomial Models
- Monte Carlo simulation
8Evolution of Stock-Based Compensation Accounting
9SFAS 123R Expensing Basics
Grant Date Fair Value (GDFV)
Number of Awards Expected to Vest
Expected Total Compensation Cost
X
True-up over time with vesting experience
Generally not trued up to settlement value
Attribute cost over the vesting period
- Ultimate expense GDFV x Vested Awards
- Cumulative expense gt GDFV of vested awards
- Expense accrued over vesting period
10SFAS 123R Expense Recognition
- Sample Award Characteristics
- Grant Date 1/1/2006
- Options Granted 1,000,000
- Vesting Schedule 4 years, 25 per year
- Grant-Date Stock Price/Exercise Price 30
- Grant-Date Fair Value, Per Option 10
- Total Grant-Date Fair Value 10,000,000
11SFAS 123R Expense Recognition
- Attribute 10,000,000 over 4 years
- Straight-line (service-based vesting only)
- 2,500,000 per year
- Accelerated under FIN 28 (each tranche as if
separate award) - Forfeiture assumption must be made, and trued up
over time best practice is to reconcile each
interim period
12Deferred Tax Accounting
- A future tax deduction is expected
- Proxy for future tax deduction is fair value
- Deferred tax asset (DTA) is accumulated as
expense is recognized - Only for non-qualified structures
- Actual tax benefit compared to DTA
- Windfall Save it to cover future shortfalls
- Shortfall Net against windfall pool, or Current
Tax Expense
13Deferred Tax Accounting
- Continuation of example
- Accumulated DTA of 3,500,000 over 4 years
(10,000,000 X 35 Tax Rate) - Tax accounting upon exercise
14The APIC/Windfall Pool
15Diluted Earnings Per Share
Numerator is reduced by FAS 123R Expense
Income Available to Shareholders Common and
Dilutive Shares
Denominator includes employee stock options
outstanding
ARE WE DOUBLE-COUNTING THE IMPACT OF STOCK
OPTIONS ON EPS?
16Diluted EPS Treasury Stock Method
17FAS123R Modifications
- Modifications are far more common now
- A modification of an award is treated as an
exchange of the original award for a new award - Requires valuation immediately before the
modification, and immediately after the
modification - Examples of Plan Modifications
- Acceleration of vesting due to a termination
(EXAMPLE) - Extension of Exercisable Period
- Knowledge of an upcoming terminating event
- Absent knowledge of a terminating event
- Upward Repricing (currently common due to
backdating) (EXAMPLE) - Downward Repricings
- Exchange of Awards in a business combination/
FAS141 (EXAMPLE) - Modification in connection with an equity
restructuring (spin-off, stock split, or one-time
dividend payout)
18Example of ModificationAcceleration of Vesting
Accounting for Modifications
- Example
- At-the-money options that cliff-vest in five
years are granted on January 1, 2007 when the
market price of the companys stock is 30 - Three years after the grant date, when the market
price of the companys stock is 45, the company
modifies the options to immediately accelerate
vesting - Valuation challenges for selecting exercise
behavior for non-ATM options
19Example of ModificationAcceleration of Vesting
(continued)
- Acceleration of vesting due to a termination
- Type 3 modification (Improbable to Probable)
- Immediately before 28.74 times 0 expected to
vest - Immediately after 24.98 times 100 expected to
vest - Therefore, incremental expense equal to 24.98
20Example of ModificationUpward Repricing
Accounting for Modifications
- Example
- Discounted stock options face punitive tax
consequences under IRC Section 409A - In many backdating cases, companies are repricing
the strike price upwards and also providing
additional cash payments of the increased strike
price to compensate for the increase - 100 options granted on 1/1/2007 that cliff vest
on 1/1/2009 with an exercise price of 10 - The grant date fair value is 6, therefore a
total of 600 of compensation expense should be
amortized from 1/1/2007 to 1/1/2009 - The exercise price is upwardly repriced to 13 on
7/1/2007 and a cash payment of 300 is provided.
The market price is 20 on 7/1/2007
21Example of ModificationUpward Repricing
(continued)
- Incremental fair value of 200 (2 x 100). Since
vested, the full 200 is recognized immediately. - The remaining 100 cash payment (300 cash
payment less 200 incremental value) is
effectively a cash settlement. Because the
options were non-vested, the settlement
accelerates recognition of compensation cost for
the portion that was settled. - Settlement Ratio determined by dividing 100 by
the value immediately before the modification of
1300, or approximately 7.7. - Prior to modification, 150 of compensation
expense was recognized, 6/24 months have been
recognized out of the total 600 of expense.
Therefore, 450 remains to be recognized. - Based on settlement ratio of 7.7, 35 of
compensation cost needs to be accelerated - Remaining compensation cost of 415 (450-35)
should be recognized over remaining 18 month
service period
22Example of ModificationBusiness Combinations
and Converted Awards
Accounting for Modifications
- Example
- Company A purchases Company B and converts
Company B awards into Company A awards on
1/1/2007 - Company A has maintained the same terms and
conditions (2.5 years remaining on 4 year graded
vesting and 8.5 years remaining to expiration)
for the converted awards as the original Company
B awards (originally 4 year vesting and 10 year
term on 7/1/2005) - Company A maintains the same intrinsic value
(keeps employees whole), and maintains the same
ratio of Market Price / Strike Price (per FIN44) - Considered a modification and requires valuation
immediately before and immediately after - Valuation of vested awards goes into Purchase
Price - Valuation of non-vested awards required to be
amortized over remaining vesting period
23Example of ModificationBusiness Combinations
and Converted Awards
Accounting for Modifications
- Example
- Original grant date value on 7/1/2005 of 5, for
500 of total compensation expense - Significant valuation challenges in picking
exercise behavior immediately before and after
the modification, since awards are not ATM, and
all have varying degrees of remaining vesting and
contractual term - SAB 107 simplified approach
- Computed Expected Life from IRS Revenue Procedure
98-34 - More sophisticated Monte Carlo simulation and
hazard modeling - As of 1/1/2007, valuation immediately after the
conversion, fair value equal to 30 - Since 25 (12 options) of the awards are vested,
360 (12 x 30) is recognized as part of the
Purchase Price - The remaining 75 of options (38 options) are
nonvested, 1,140 (38 x 30) should be amortized
over the remaining service period (30 months).
Therefore, 456 should be recognized during 2007.
24Navigating Footnote Disclosures
- Information can usually be found in
- Summary of Accounting Policies footnote
- Stock Compensation footnote
- Required annual disclosure
- Share roll-forward, aggregate intrinsic value
- FAS 123R Impact on Net Income and EPS
- Valuation methodology and assumptions
25Impact of Expensing Stock Options
- No form of equity compensation is free
- Plain vanilla stock options are no longer favored
- Performance-based features no longer penalized
- Enhanced 10K and proxy disclosure
- Clearer picture of equity compensation programs
- Enhances investors and analysts ability to
forecast dilution - Convergence to international accounting standards
26Current Events
- Option granting practices
- Backdating (Over 100 companies being
investigated) - Google Transferable Stock Options
- SEC Proxy Disclosure of Executive Comp
- Zions Bank Market-Based Valuation
27QA