The Swedish Taxonomy Initiative and DNA Barcoding - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

The Swedish Taxonomy Initiative and DNA Barcoding

Description:

The Swedish Taxonomy Initiative and DNA Barcoding – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: fredrikr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Swedish Taxonomy Initiative and DNA Barcoding


1
The Swedish Taxonomy Initiative and DNA Barcoding
  • Fredrik Ronquist
  • Swedish Museum of Natural History

2
Tree of life
Green leaves are described species, white leaves
undescribed
Our knowledge is very limited and strongly biased
3
All-Taxon Biodiversity Inventories
  • We need them
  • Biodiversity conservation efforts
  • Biodiversity prospecting
  • Environmental monitoring, e.g. climate change
  • How do we find the funding?
  • Private mercenaries (All Species Foundation)
  • Large private funds (the Sloan Foundation)
  • National pride and threatened species
    conservation
  • How do we organize the work?
  • Logistic challenges
  • Information Technology Challenges

4
Swedish Taxonomy Initiative
  • Within 20 years, all Swedish multicellular
    species will be scientifically described and
    documented
  • All species that can be identified without
    advanced technical methodology (appr. 35,000)
    will be presented in Swedish in a
    well-illustrated Swedish Flora and Fauna
    Encyclopaedia
  • There will be keys to all species and the
    distribution, biology, and conservation of each
    species will be summarized
  • A collaborative project coordinated by the
    Swedish Species Information Centre (ArtDatabanken)

5
Selling Points
  • Only 20,000 of our estimated 60,000 Swedish
    species had been judged according to the IUCN
    red-listing criteria, to a large extent thanks to
    amateur naturalists and other non-specialists
  • For environmental monitoring and other purposes,
    we need identification guides to all species.
    Amateurs and non-specialists must be able to use
    them.
  • For public education purposes, we need
    presentations of all our species.
  • Sweden was pushing internationally for
    biodiversity inventories (e.g. Global Taxonomy
    Initiative) while taxonomic and
    faunistic/floristic research on poorly known
    organism groups was dwindling locally and support
    for natural history museums was not adequate.

6
The completion of the first national
biodiversity map will undoubtedly be a
significant event. Will the Swedes, inspired by
their Linnaean tradition, be first?
Ronquist and Gärdenfors, TREE, 2002
7
Initial Launch (2002-2004)
  • 40 M SEK for the Swedish Species Information
    Center to launch the Swedish Species Initiative
  • 40 M SEK to support Natural History Museums
    through FORMAS
  • 480 M SEK to FORMAS and VR to support
    biodiversity-related research

8
Biodiversity Initiative Funds
Well known
Swedish Biological Diversity
Poorly known
Vetenskapsrådet (VR)
Poorly known (2.7 )
9
STI from 2005
  • Managed solely by the Swedish Species Information
    Center
  • 30 M SEK/year for the core activities,
    Biodiversity Encyclopedia, inventories, etc.
  • 15 M SEK/year to support taxonomic research on
    poorly known organisms
  • 20 M SEK/year to support natural history museums
  • 1 300 M SEK over 20 years (appr. 200 M, 140 M
    Euro)

10
Research Support
  • 62 M SEK (10 M, 7 M euro) reserved (2002-2010)
  • In total about 45 scientists, including
  • 8 PhD students
  • 4.5 Research Fellows (Forskarassistent)
  • 9 Guest researcher / Postdoc

11
What Organism Groups?
  • Insects 31
  • Other invertebrates 24
  • Fungi, algae, lichens 38
  • Angiosperms 6
  • Vertebrates 1

12
Support to Museums
  • Specimen-level data capture, mainly for Nordic
    material, both old and new
  • Curation of important collections in poor
    condition
  • Hiring of additional curators and taxonomists
    specializing in poorly known groups
  • Development of a national database system for
    specimen-level information

13
First volume in Nationalnyckeln till Sveriges
flora och fauna (the National Biodiversity
Encyclopedia) was delivered to the Swedish
Parliament on April 25 2005. The volume covers
butterflies.
14
BladmossorSköldmossor-blåmossor
Text Tomas Hallingbäck, Niklas Lönnell, Henrik
Weibull m fl Bild Polyanna von Knorring m fl
15
Ädelspinnare- tofsspinnare
Text Nils Hydén Bild Torbjörn Östman, Karl Jilg
16
Lång- horningar
2007
Text Bengt Ehnström Bild Martin Holmer
17
Käkmalar tillsäckspinnare
2007
Text Bengt-Åke Bengtsson, Göran Palmqvist Bild
Roland Johansson
18
Small picture-based field guides accompany some
volumes
19
Nationalnyckeln Numbers
  • About 130 volumes in total
  • Largest book project ever in Sweden
  • 28,000 copies distributed of the first volume on
    butterflies
  • About 7,000 subscribers
  • Subscription price 200 SEK (22 ) per volume

20
The public appeal of slime molds
Biologists and professional actors star in plays
on poorly known Swedish organism groups
21
Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden, supports the
Swedish Taxonomy Initiative
22
Swedish Malaise Trap Project
Field Part 2003-2006
ca 1650 km
61 traps at 44 localities mounted in June 2003
11 traps at 8 localities mounted winter
2004/2005
23
(No Transcript)
24
Njakajaureleden, Abisko
25
Nuolja, Abisko
26
Ungfars mosse, Tyresta
27
Hunga Södergård, Trosa
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
Results
  • 25,000 Swedish insect species known before the
    project started
  • 40 million specimens have been collected during 3
    years
  • About 20 of the material has been sorted to
    major groups about 5 has been identified to
    species
  • In the identified material, we have found about
    1,000 new species records for Sweden, half of
    which are new to science

31
Aftonbladet October 11, 2006
  • More than 100 articles in local and national
    newspapers
  • More than 20 reports on national TV
  • More than 100 reports on local and national radio

32
DNA barcoding!
  • Fresh material of a large portion of the Swedish
    fauna and flora
  • Access to a lot of taxonomic expertise
  • Cheaper to do it now and than any time in the
    near future

33
BUT
  • Effective barcoding needs traditional taxonomic
    work no cost saving
  • Barcoding powerful but not universal
    identification aid
  • When not needed for other reasons, DNA barcoding
    is an extra cost that can jeopardize the
    completion of the inventory
  • Most monitoring done by amateur naturalists
    unlikely to have access to DNA barcoding
    equipment, may not even want it

34
SO
  • DO barcode when molecular sequencing is needed
    for completion of the inventory
  • DO NOT barcode in other cases (e.g., well known
    groups like butterflies, beetles, vertebrates,
    angiosperms, etc)
  • unless funded from other sources than the STI

35
All opinions expressed in this talk are my own
and are not to be interpreted as the official
position of the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative or
the Swedish Museum of Natural History.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com