Learning about medicines: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Learning about medicines:

Description:

Their side effects are mostly acceptable. A lot is known about all three, none are new ... Atenolol 5. Differences in individual sensitivity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: Andr961
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning about medicines:


1
Learning about medicines
  • needs a framework
  • Andrew Herxheimer

2
We need information to decide
  • whether to use a medicine or not
  • if yes, which to choose
  • how to use it, for how long
  • what to look out for while using it
  • whether some event is connected with the medicine
  • whether and how to change the dose or
  • stop

3
The information may not be enough to enable us
to decide because
  • we dont know enough about the problem we want to
    treat
  • or we cant easily apply it to our own
    circumstances
  • or we lack experience confidence
  • So we need to discuss it

4
In deciding what to prescribe a doctor has to
consider
  • the disease or problem
  • the treatment
  • the individual to be treated

5
Half the job is having the information, the
other half, knowing what to do with it
judgments must be made. They involve facts and
values
6
Weighing up benefits and harms
  • can be complicated because
  • the natural course of a disease varies
  • an expected benefit matters more to some people
    than to others
  • disadvantages of treatment, including possible
    harms, worry some more than others
  • everyone has personal preferences

7
Organising the information on a medicine Key
questions
  • What type of medicine is it?
  • Does it cure, relieve symptoms, prevent a
    problem, or help to maintain normal function?
  • What are its benefits and disadvantages?
  • How does it get to where it acts?
  • How how fast is it eliminated?
  • The bigger the dose, the bigger the effects?
  • How do people differ in sensitivity to it?

8
An example High blood pressure needing drug
treatment
  • Ranking whats on the menu
  • Effectiveness
  • Safety
  • Quality completeness of information
  • Convenience
  • Patients preference
  • Cost

9
Three types of drug to consider (1) a
diuretic (2) a beta-blocker (3) an ACE inhibitor
  • Each helps to prevent stroke and heart attack
  • Each is safe except (1) in gout,
  • (2) in asthma, (3) in kidney disease
  • Their side effects are mostly acceptable
  • A lot is known about all three, none are new
  • All are convenient to use
  • (1) and (2) cost less than (3)

10
Lets look at atenolol, a beta-blocker
  • Benefits v. disadvantages
  • atenolol reduces high BP, helps
  • prevent angina, stroke, heart attack
  • can worsen asthma, cause tiredness,
  • cold hands feet

11
Atenolol 2How does it get to where it
acts?It acts on the heart and reaches it via
the blood
12
Atenolol 3How and how fast is it
eliminated?Its excreted in the urine A dose
acts for 8 to 24 hours
13
Atenolol 4The bigger the dose, the bigger the
effect?Treatment can start with 25mg/day
or even less The dose can if necessary be
increased to 50 or even 100mg/dayBut higher
doses also cause side effects more often and
more intensely
14
Atenolol 5Differences in individual
sensitivityMost elderly or thin people need
only small dosesWomen may need smaller doses
than menBlack people are less sensitive
15
Concordance achieving shared goals in medicine
use
  • To achieve shared goals,
  • professionals and patients need to understand
    each other,
  • and to understand how the other thinks.
  • Doctors must not only inform, but listen and
    explain.
  • Doctor originally meant teacher.

16
But crash courses in consultations cannot do very
much
  • Theres far too much else to take in
  • Patients are often anxious or tense
  • Time is short
  • Learning/ teaching is rarely on the agenda for
    either patient or doctor

17
So how should we shape the future of patient
information?
  • 1. Information can only be well used by people
    with adequate information receptors. That means
    they have to understand the relevant concepts.
  • 2. Ideally they should learn the rudiments of
    critical appraisal to be able to assess the
    relevance, validity reliability of information.
  • 3. Sources of reliable health information on
    diseases, treatments, nutrition, etc must be
    identifiable as such.
  • 4. Written information should be tested on
    samples of real patients, to check that most can
    use it effectively

18
1. Basic concepts about medicines should be
taught in schools
  • They straddle biology, domestic science and
    social science, and are easy to grasp
  • They provide broader perspectives than drug
    education, which shouldnt be separate
  • They are easy and interesting to illustrate from
    everyday experience and
    lend themselves to simple projects
  • The students can be encouraged and helped to
    teach older family members as happens in many
    developing countries

19
2. Critical appraisal workshops for patients/
consumers/ health service users can enable more
people
  • to contribute their experience views to
  • research agendas
  • ethics committees
  • health service management
  • independent self-help groups
  • to recognise misinformation manipulation

20
3. Identifying reliable and helpful information
  • Accreditation of information sources nationally
    internationally kitemarks?
  • Transparent official endorsement of
    trustworthy information, eg using the DISCERN
    criteria
  • Links to National electronic Library of Health
    (NeLH)
  • Internet sites are a special problem

21
4. Written information should be tested
  • Until now most information is produced by
    professionals who decide what information
    patients/ consumers need, and not tested.
  • We must involve consumers in the design of the
    information, and test leaflets, etc, on samples
    of the patients for whom they are intended, and
    improve the material until at least 80 of people
    can understand and use it effectively.
  • This has been pioneered in Australia

22
Pharmaceutical promotion
  • The truth,
  • the half-truth,
  • and nothing like the truth
  • Direct-to-consumer advertising of
  • prescription medicines, as in the US,
    spreads misinformation, distorts health care,
    does not improve health, increases costs

23
Last but far from least professionals must learn
from patients and carers
  • Ask them what they think of the treatment
  • how they use it
  • Listen to their experiences eg DIPEx (Database
    of Individual Patients Experiences of illness)
  • Enable patients to report adverse events directly
    to regulatory authorities companies
  • Help patients to learn from the experiences of
    others

24
DIPEx website
  • Analysis of a broad range of peoples
    narrative descriptions of their experience
  • Linked to evidence-based information about
    treatments, resources, support groups
  • Overlapping information needs - presented for
    patients, family, teachers, students, health
    professionals, policy makers, researchers

25
Welcome to DIPEx
26
DIPEx database Narratives
  • summaries of main themes from interviews
  • illustrated with video, audio and written clips
    from the interviews people telling their
    stories

27
DIPEx database Evidence
  • descriptions of the condition, prevalence,
    prevention
  • information about treatments, including evidence
    of effects
  • questions and answers
  • All indexed and searchable

28
DIPEx studies now
  • Complete on website hypertension, prostate
    cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer
  • Current cervical screening, cervical
    cancer, testis cancer, carers of people with
    dementia
  • Planned for 2002/03 epilepsy, rheumatoid
    arthritis, smoking cessation, malignant melanoma,
    lung cancer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com