Title: Research Methods in Social Psychology
1Research Methods in Social Psychology
2Last Time
- psychology relies on empirical methods
- theories are general propositions about causal
relationships amongst constructs - hypotheses are conceptual statements that require
operationalization - science is a process of conjecture and
refutation
3Our Proposition
- Hypothesis Southern white males are more prone
to aggression than are Northern white males.
(conjecture) - Well look at different strategies to examine
hypotheses. (refutation)
4Refutation
- putting theories to the test
- What evidence supports (and, more importantly,
disconfirms) our theories?
5Descriptive Research
- assesses the amount or average level of a given
variable in a population - e.g., public opinion surveys
- not a true test of an hypothesis
- What is the white male homicide rate in the South?
6Descriptive Research
- What is the white male homicide rate in the South?
adapted from Nisbett (1993)
7Descriptive Research
- critical issues
- random sampling
- basis of comparison
- informative, but not a hypothesis test
- What else could account for the findings?
8Correlational Research
- investigates whether changes in one variable are
related to changes in another variable - What is the relationship between being from the
South and aggressive behavior?
9Correlational Research
- correlation coefficients
- range from 1.00 to -1.00
- positive correlation increase/decrease in the
same direction
10Correlational Research
11Correlational Research
- correlation coefficients
- range from 1.00 to -1.00
- negative correlation increase/decrease in
opposite directions
12Correlational Research
13Correlational Research
- correlation coefficients
- range from 1.00 to -1.00
- strength of the relationship closeness to
1.00/-1.00, not by the valence (/-) - Which indicates a stronger correlation -.74 or
.21?
14Correlational Research
15Correlational Research
- What is the relationship between being from the
South and aggressive behavior? - Nisbett (1993)
- homicide rate and southernness rs .37 .52
- in the social sciences (Cohen, 1992)
- r .50 (strong)
- r .30 (moderate)
- r .10 (small)
16Correlational Research
- strengths of this approach
- can be a random sample
- actual behavior
- has good generalizability (i.e., external
validity) - potential for numerous variables
17Correlational Research
- weakness of this approach
- cannot infer a cause-effect relationship
- factors for inferring causality
- association -- yes
- temporal priority -- no
- rule out a spurious relationship -- no
18Correlational Research
time
southernness
homicide rates
19Correlational Research
time
southernness
homicide rates
or
time
homicide rates
southernness
20Correlational Research
- temporal priority
- direction of causality problem
time
southernness
homicide rates
or
time
homicide rates
southernness
21Correlational Research
- rule out a spurious relationship
another variable
southernness
homicide rates
spurious
22Correlational Research
- rule out a spurious relationship
poverty
rs .38 .42
southernness
homicide rates
(Nisbett, 1993)
23Correlational Research
- rule out a spurious relationship
- 3rd variable problem
another variable
southernness
homicide rates
spurious
24Correlational Research
- strengths
- potential for numerous variables
- good generalizability
- weaknesses
- cannot make causal conclusions
- direction of causality
- 3rd variable problem
25Addressing Problems with Correlational Research
- direction of causality problem
- Does southernness lead to more aggression or
does a propensity for aggression lead to more
southernness? - solution we cause (i.e., manipulate) one of the
variables - insult one group on Southerners, but not another
26Addressing Problems with Correlational Research
- direction of causality problem
- if we control who is insulted, then measure
aggressiveness, we know the direction of
causality - but, we still have the 3rd variable problem
- SES
- poor social skills
27Addressing Problems with Correlational Research
- random assignment to condition
- if SES or social skills have an effect on
aggression, it should be equal for both groups - We can address the problems of correlational
research by doing experiments.
28Experimental Design
- characteristics
- manipulation of a variable
- solves the direction of causality problem
- randomly assign to conditions
- solves the 3rd variable problem
29Experimental Design
- language of experiments
- independent variable
- dependent variable
- operational variable
- random assignment
30Experimental Design
- testing theory
- Does the independent variable cause changes in
the dependent variable?
cause
southernness
aggression
31Experimental Design
- the Southern culture of honor hypothesis
- Cohen et al. (1996)
- 2 (Southern/Northern) X 2 (insult/no insult)
- chicken, cortisol, testosterone
32Experimental Design
Distance at which participants gave way to
confederate (inches)
Insult
No Insult
33Experimental Design
Distance at which participants gave way to
confederate (inches)
Insult
No Insult
34Experimental Design
Percentage Change in Cortisol Level
Insult
No Insult
35Experimental Design
Percentage Change in Cortisol Level
Insult
No Insult
36Experimental Design
Percentage Change in Testosterone Level
Insult
No Insult
37Experimental Design
Percentage Change in Testosterone Level
Insult
No Insult
38Experimental Design
- strengths
- allows for causal conclusions to be made -- best
test of theory - weaknesses
- not all questions are amenable to experiments
- concerns about generalizability
39Methodological Challenges
- expectancy effects
- demand characteristics of the situation
- social desirability concerns
- ethical dilemmas
40Summary
- refutation process of testing theories
- descriptive research is informative, but limited
in theory testing - correlational research is more informative, but
does not allow for causal explanations - experiments are the best test of theories
41Next Time
- social cognition
- how we think about the social world