Title: Methods for Assessing Policy Impact
1Methods for Assessing Policy Impact
- Process and Partnerships for Pro-Poor Policy
Change, Project Initiation Workshop 1 - ILRI, 21st February 2005
2Workshop Outline
- Introduction to the RAPID Framework and ILRI/ODI
Project - Case Study Approach
- Episode Study Approach
- Outcome Mapping Approach
- RAPID Outcome Assessment (ROA) Approach
- Lunch
- Practical Sessions
3Workshop Purpose Objectives
Purpose To familiarise the participants with
the general approach and specific methods to be
used in the SDP case study
- Objectives
- By the end of the workshop, participants will
- understand the Process and Partnership for
Pro-Poor Policy Change projects purpose and
general approach - have the opportunity to contribute their own
suggestions to improve the project - understand, and have had the chance to try out
the three key methods which will be used in the
project - assess the usefulness of the approaches in their
own work.
4- An introduction to the RAPID Framework and
ILRI/ODI Project
5Definitions
- Research any systematic effort to increase the
stock of knowledge - Policy a purposive course of action followed by
an actor or set of actors - Agendas / policy horizons
- Official statements documents
- Patterns of spending
- Implementation processes
- Activities on the ground
6Policy Processes
- - Identify a policy problem
- - Commission research
- - Assess the results
- - Select the best policy
- - Establish the policy
framework - - Implement the policy
- - The problem is
solved
7Reality
- The whole life of policy is a chaos of purposes
and accidents. It is not at all a matter of the
rational implementation of the so-called
decisions through selected strategies 1 - Most policy research on African agriculture is
irrelevant to agricultural and overall economic
policy in Africa2
1 - Clay Schaffer (1984), Room for Manoeuvre
An Exploration of Public Policy in
Agricultural and Rural Development, Heineman
Educational Books, London 2 Omamo (2003),
Policy Research on African Agriculture Trends,
Gaps, and Challenges, International Service
for National Agricultural Research (ISNAR)
Research Report No 21
8Existing theory
- Linear model
- Percolation model, Weiss
- Tipping point model, Gladwell
- Context, evidence, links framework, ODI
- Policy narratives, Roe
- Systems model (NSI)
- External forces, Lindquist
- Room for manoeuvre, Clay Schaffer
- Street level bureaucrats, Lipsky
- Policy as social experiments, Rondinelli
- Policy Streams Windows, Kingdon
- Disjointed incrementalism, Lindquist
- The tipping point, Gladwell
- Crisis model, Kuhn
- Framework of possible thought, Chomsky
- Variables for Credibility, Beach
- The source is as important as content, Gladwell
- Linear model of communication, Shannon
- Interactive model,
- Simple and surprising stories, Communication
Theory - Provide solutions, Marketing Theory I
- Find the right packaging, Marketing II
- Elicit a response, Kottler
- Translation of technology, Volkow
- Epistemic communities
- Policy communities
- Advocacy coalitions etc, Pross
- Negotiation through networks, Sebattier
- Shadow networks, Klickert
- Chains of accountability, Fine
- Communication for social change, Rockefeller
- Wheels and webs, Chapman Fisher
www.odi.org.uk/rapid/lessons/theory
9Existing theory a short list
- Policy narratives, Roe
- Systems of Innovation Model, (NSI)
- Room for manoeuvre, Clay Schaffer
- Street level bureaucrats, Lipsky
- Policy as social experiments, Rondene
- Policy streams and policy windows, Kingdon
- Disjointed Incrementalism, Lindblom
- Social Epidemics, Gladwell
10An Analytical Framework
External Influences Socio-economic and
cultural influences, donor policies etc
11Case Studies
- Sustainable Livelihoods The Evolution of DFID
Policy - The PRSP Initiative Research in Multilateral
Policy Change - The adoption of Ethical Principles in
Humanitarian Aid post Rwanda - Animal Health Care in Kenya Evidence fails to
influence Policy
12A Practical Framework
political context
Politics and Policymaking
Media, Advocacy, Networking
Research, learning thinking
evidence
links
13What you need to know
- The external environment Who are the key actors?
What is their agenda? How do they influence the
political context? - The political context Is there political
interest in change? Is there room for manoeuvre?
How do they perceive the problem? - The evidence Is it there? Is it relevant? Is it
practically useful? Are the concepts familiar or
new? Does it need re-packaging? - Links Who are the key individuals? Are there
existing networks to use? How best to transfer
the information? The media? Campaigns?
14What researchers need to do
- Get to know the policymakers.
- Identify friends and foes.
- Prepare for policy opportunities.
- Look out for policy windows.
- Work with them seek commissions
- Strategic opportunism prepare for known events
resources for others
- Who are the policymakers?
- Is there demand for ideas?
- What is the policy process?
- Establish credibility
- Provide practical solutions
- Establish legitimacy.
- Present clear options
- Use familiar narratives.
- Build a reputation
- Action-research
- Pilot projects to generate legitimacy
- Good communication
- What is the current theory?
- What are the narratives?
- How divergent is it?
- Build partnerships.
- Identify key networkers, mavens and salesmen.
- Use informal contacts
- Get to know the others
- Work through existing networks.
- Build coalitions.
- Build new policy networks.
- Who are the stakeholders?
- What networks exist?
- Who are the connectors, mavens and salesmen?
15Policy entrepreneurs
Networkers
Storytellers
Engineers
Fixers
16 Practical Tools
Overarching Tools - The RAPID
Framework - Using the Framework -
The Entrepreneurship Questionnaire
Context Assessment Tools - Stakeholder Analysis
- Forcefield Analysis - Writeshops -
Policy Mapping - Political Context
Mapping
Communication Tools - Communications
Strategy - SWOT analysis - Message Design -
Making use of the media
Research Tools - Case Studies
- Episode Studies - Surveys -
Bibliometric Analysis - Focus Group Discussion
Policy Influence Tools - Influence Mapping
Power Mapping - Lobbying and Advocacy -
Campaigning A Simple Guide - Competency
self-assessment
17Practical Application
- Within ODI
- Workshops for researchers, policy makers and
activists. - Advice to a DFID forest/ground water research
project in India - Less research
- More communication
- Developing champions in regional and national
government - Local, Regional National advocacy campaign
18Further Information / Resources
- ODI Working Papers
- Bridging Research and Policy Book
- Meeting series Monograph
- Tools for Policy Impact
- RAPID Briefing Paper
- www.odi.org.uk/rapid
19Can ILRI do it?
- Yes, but
- It this its role?
- Global Public Good Research vs Policy Advocacy
- Probably needs to do both
- How?
- Understand the political context
- Get the evidence package it well
- Strategic networking / lobbying / campaigning
- Collaboration.
20ILRI International Livestock
Research Institute
Process and partnership for pro-poor policy change
The New DfID funded Project
21ILRI International Livestock
Research Institute
- Project Leaders ODI / ILRI
- Key collaborators ECAPAPA
- Case study collaborators in Kenya
- MoLFD / KARI
- Range of NGOs other SDP partners
22 Why would I be interested?
ILRI International Livestock
Research Institute
- Not all research is expected or intended to lead
to policy change, but there may be - Specific cases where research is expected to
- provide evidence for policy change
- identify potential policies (or impact of)
- influence the policy making process (advocacy)
- Cases where speculative research becomes relevant
because of changes in circumstance
23 The project
ILRI International Livestock
Research Institute
- Ideas for methods and approaches
- Lessons learnt from earlier activities
- Identification of appropriate communication tools
24What will we be doing?
ILRI International Livestock
Research Institute
- Three case studies in three DIFFERENT countries
- A project considered to have influenced policy
change - A stream of research addressing a particular
policy area - A clear policy change
- New policy statement
- New law
- Irrefutable change in way something is done
25 What will we be doing?
ILRI International Livestock
Research Institute
- Three case studies
- SDP and impact on changed view of informal milk
trade - ????
- ????
26- Discussion
- Can ILRI hope to influence pro-poor policy
through research? - Any good case studies?
27 28What is a Case Study?
- Definition
- " A systematic inquiry into an event or a set of
related events which aims to describe and explain
the phenomenon of interest" Bromley (1990)
29Why is it useful?
Goal to describe as accurately as possible the
fullest, most complete description of the case.
- An ideal methodology when a holistic, in-depth
investigation is needed - Designed to bring out the details from the
viewpoint of the participants by using multiple
sources of data
30Types of Case Study
- Types of case studies
- Exploratory,
- Explanatory,
- Descriptive (Yin, 1993)
- Stake (1995) included three others
- Intrinsic - when the researcher has an interest
in the case - Instrumental - when the case is used to
understand more than what is obvious to the
observer - Collective - when a group of cases is studied.
31Issues
- The unit of analysis is a critical factor
- Typically a system of action rather than an
individual or group of individuals - Tend to be selective, focusing on one or two
issues that are fundamental to understanding the
system being examined - Case studies are multi-perspectival analyses
- The researcher considers not just the voice and
perspective of the actors, but also of the
relevant groups of actors and the interaction
between them - They give a voice to the powerless and voiceless.
32Triangulation
- Data source triangulation, when the researcher
looks for the data to remain the same in
different contexts - Investigator triangulation, when several
investigators examine the same phenomenon - Theory triangulation, when investigators with
different view points interpret the same results
and - Methodological triangulation, when one approach
is followed by another, to increase confidence in
the interpretation.
33Applications
- To explain complex causal links between research
and policy - To describe the real-life context in which policy
has been influenced by research - To describe the policy influencing process itself
- To explore those situations in which the policy
intervention being evaluated has no clear set of
outcomes.
34Process
- Design the case study protocol
- determine the required skills
- develop and review the protocol
- Conduct the case study
- prepare for data collection
- distribute questionnaire
- conduct interviews
- Analyze case study evidence
- analytic strategy
- Develop conclusions, recommendations, and
implications based on the evidence
35 36What is an Episode Study
- A study that focuses on a clear policy change
and tracks back to assess what impact research
had among the variety of issues that led to the
policy change.
37What is the purpose?
Tracking backwards from policy change to any
particular research which influence policy
- an excellent way of investigating the influence
of research on policy - Can focus on a single episode or comparative
episodes.
38Advantage
- The process of working backwards in time gives a
more realistic view of the broad range of factors
other than research that influence policy - Tracking forward probably overemphasizes
- the importance of research
39Issues
- Policy processes are complex, multi-layered and
change over time - Often difficult to isolate the impact of research
from other factors - Actors may re-write history
- Important to seek the views of a wide range of
informed stakeholders - The process of preparing an episode study is
iterative - Key facts and / or inconsistencies need to be
cross-checked with key informants
40Process
- Identify a clear policy change.
- Identify key Research Questions (draw on RAPID
framework) - Explore how and why those policy decisions and
practices took place - Assess the relative role of research in that
process by drawing on the framework.
41Apply the RAPID Framework
political context
Politics and Policymaking
Media, Advocacy, Networking
Research, learning thinking
evidence
links
42Key Questions
- The external environment Who are the key actors?
What is their agenda? How do they influence the
political context? - The political context Is there political
interest in change? Is there room for manoeuvre?
How do they perceive the problem? - The evidence Is it there? Is it relevant? Is it
practically useful? Are the concepts familiar or
new? Does it need re-packaging? - Links Who are the key individuals? Are there
existing networks to use? How best to transfer
the information? The media? Campaigns?
43Methods
Steps 3 and 4 can be done through a variety of
methods
- review of the literature
- interviews with key actors
- capturing the authors own experience and
- discussions at workshops.
44 45Paravets in Kenya
- Professionalisation of Public Services.
- Structural Adjustment ? Collapse
- Paravet projects emerge.
- ITDG projects.
- Privatisation.
- ITDG Paravet network.
- Rapid spread in North.
- KVB letter (January 1998).
- Multistakeholder WSs ? new policies.
- Still not approved / passed!
- Professionalisation of Public Services.
- Structural Adjustment
- Privatisation
- ITDG Paravet network and change of DVS.
- KVB letter (January 1998).
- Multistakeholder WSs ? new policies.
ITDG projects collaborative research.
Dr Kajume
46PRSPs Political Context
- Widespread awareness of a problem with
international development policy in late 90s - Failure of SAPs (and Asian financial crisis)
- Mounting public pressure for debt relief
- Stagnation of Comprehensive Development Framework
idea - Diverging agendas (UK Poverty, US Governance)
- WB/IMF Annual General Meeting, Sept 1999
47PRSPs Evidence
- Long-term academic research informing new focus
on poverty, participation, ownership, aid
effectiveness etc - Applied policy research
- ESAF reviews
- HIPC review
- SPA Working Groups
- NGO research on debt
- Ugandas PEAP
48PRSPs Links
- WB, IMF, SPA, Bilaterals, NGOs all involved
- Formal an informal networks
- None of the players was more than two handshakes
away from any of the others
49 50What is it?
- an integrated PME tool
- a system to think holistically strategically
about how we intend to achieve result - an approach that focuses on changes in the
behaviour, relationships or actions of partners
(as outcomes) - a methodology that characterizes and assesses the
programs contributions to the achievement of
outcomes - an approach for designing in relation to the
broader development context but assessing within
your sphere of influence
51Focus On Behavioural Change
52How can it be used?
- For a program to tell its performance story in
outcome terms by - articulating its goals and designing its
activities - designing a monitoring system for assessing
internal performance and outcomes of partners - setting a use-oriented evaluation plan
53Why use it?
- Focussing on changes in partners behaviour,
relationships, or actions allows a program to - measure results within its sphere of influence
- obtain feedback about its efforts in order to
improve its performance - take credit for its contributions to the
achievement of outcomes - show progress towards outcomes
54Terminology
- Outcomes changes in behaviours, relationships,
activities and/or actions of the people, groups
and organisations with whom we work - Vision the broad human, social and environmental
betterment we desire - Mission how we intend to contribute towards the
achievement of the vision - Boundary partners individuals, groups and
organisations with whom we interact directly to
effect change - Outcome challenges changes behaviours of the
boundary partners as identified by the vision
55The Three Stages
56Intentional Study Design
57Performance Monitoring
- Provides a framework for a continuous monitoring
of the initiative as a tool to achieve its
outcomes. - The program uses progress markers, a set of
graduated indicators of behavioural change,
identified in the intentional design stage to
clarify direction with its primary partners and
to monitor outcomes
58Evaluation Planning
- Helps identify the evaluation priorities
assessing the strategy at greater depth than the
performance monitoring stage
59Main Elements
60 61What is it?
- A Visual Tool
- Combines the outcome mapping concept within a
case study episode study approach - Systematic approach to collecting information
about changes in behaviour of key project
partners that contributed to the policy change - Assessment of the contribution of the project
(programme, strategy, etc.) to observed changes
in behaviour and ultimately to the policy change
62Approach
- Describe policy environment at end
- Describe policy environment at the beginning
- Identify the key policy actors
- Identify key boundary partners
- Describe boundary partner behaviour at end
- Describe boundary partner behaviour at beginning
- Describe changes in BP behaviour
- Describe changes in project (strategic/opportunist
ic) - Describe external influences
- Determine level of impact of changes in project
- Determine level of impact of external influences
- Check through external interviews
- Write report
63Sources Outputs
- Literature review
- - Project background, progress, (published)
achievements - Participatory workshop with staff (and BP)
- Gather detailed information
- Identify issues for further investigation
- Interviews with key informants to
- Triangulate the result of the workshop,
- Fill the gaps of information
- Clarify causality
- Report Writing
- Visual and Narrative
64ROA Terms and Definitions
- Boundary partners individuals, groups and
organisations with whom we interact directly to
effect change. - Outcomes changes in behaviours, relationships,
activities and/or actions of the people, groups
and organisations with whom we work. - Behaviours the way we or our boundary partners
do or think about things.
65The key steps of the ROA framework
- Describe the policy environment at the end of the
project
66The key steps of the ROA framework
- 2. Describe the policy environment at the
beginning of the project
67The key steps of the ROA framework
3/4. Identify key policy actors and boundary
partners (that were influential at end)
68The key steps of the ROA framework
- 5. Describe the behaviours of the boundary
partners that contributed to the change in the
policy environment or policy
69The key steps of the ROA framework
- Describe the behaviours of the boundary partners
at the beginning of the project
70The key steps of the ROA framework
- 7. Map the key changes in behaviour for each
boundary partner from the start of the project
71The key steps of the ROA framework
- 8. Map the key changes in the project including
organisational changes, outputs and changes in
behaviour during the same period.
72The key steps of the ROA framework
- Map the external influences including the actions
f strategic partners and other exogenous factors
during the same period
73The key steps of the ROA framework
- 10. Determine the level of impact/influence of
the project on the changes in behaviour of the
boundary partners
74The key steps of the ROA framework
- 11. Determine the level of impact/influence of
external influences on the changes in behaviour
of the boundary partners and the project
75The key steps of the ROA framework
- 12. Refine conclusions with in-depth interviews
and assess the real contribution of the project
on the policy change