Keith FordThales Training

1
Synthetic Environment Development Exploitation
Process
Keith Ford Thales Training Simulation
2
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

• Origins of SEDEP
• Use of SEDEP
• Comparison of steps
• SEDEP Browser

3
ORIGINS OF SEDEP (1)

• DMSO HLA FEDEP v1.5

4
ORIGINS OF SEDEP (2)

• Euclid 11.14 TRA Process

User Needs Analysis
Composition
Preparation
Execution
Evaluation
5
ORIGINS OF SEDEP (3)
Analyse Users Needs
User Needs Analysis

• Euclid 11.13 Process merged
• TRA Process
• FEDEP v1.5
• SEDEP applicable to any form of networked
  simulation

Define Fed.Objectives
Develop Fed. Conceptual Model
DMSO FEDEP Version 1.5
Design Federation
Develop Federation
Integrate Test Federation
Execute Fed. Prepare Results
Perform Evaluation
6
ORIGINS OF SEDEP (4)
Analyse Users Needs
User Needs Analysis
Proposal for Enhanced FEDEP
Perform Evaluation
7
SEDEP INFLUENCE ON 1516.3

• Euclid 11.13 Participation in FEDEP
  Productisation Group
• 28 proposed changes resulting from SEDEP v1.0
• 14 were rejected
• 8 had alternatives suggested
• 16 adopted (including new step, activities,
  tasks)
• Most important contribution is step 7

Analyse Data Evaluate Results
8
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

• Origins of SEDEP
• Use of SEDEP
• Comparison of steps
• SEDEP Browser

9
ITERATIVE USE OF SEDEP
10
REUSE OF SEDEP PRODUCTS
Increase of Data in Repository
High-Level Process
11
SEDEP USE CASES

• One-off development
• Mission rehearsal example
• Iterative application of SEDEP
• Training system development
• Reuse of SEDEP products
• Military system acquisition

12
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

• Origins of SEDEP
• Use of SEDEP
• Comparison of steps
• SEDEP Browser

13
DISCLAIMER

• Following slides show SEDEP v1.1
• This is currently undergoing a major update and
  will be released as SEDEP v2.0 in October

14
FEDEP Step 0
NO FEDEP Step 0
15
STEP 0 ANALYSE USER NEEDS
Identify User Inputs
User Inputs
User Needs
Iteration objective
Analyse Existing SE Data
Relevant Data
SE Asset Library
SE Project Library
Project Planning
Tailored SEDEP
Project Plans
16
FEDEP Step 1 Define Federation Objectives
17
STEP 1 DEFINE FEDERATION USER REQUIREMENTS
18
FEDEP Step 2 Develop Federation Conceptual Model
19
STEP 2 DEFINE FEDERATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
20
FEDEP Step 3 Design Federation
21
STEP 3 DESIGN FEDERATION
22
FEDEP Step 4 - Develop Federation
23
STEP 4 IMPLEMENT FEDERATION
24
FEDEP Step 5 Integrate Test Federation
25
STEP 5 INTEGRATE TEST FEDERATION
System Integration, Test and Acceptance Plan
SITAP( for Network)
Prepare Test Network Infrastructure
Network Configuration Result and Protocol
Tested Network
Implemented NCI
Implemented Federates
Prepare Test Federates (Incremental)
Implemented RTI
Problem Report (Opt)
RID
Implemented Federation Infrastructure
FEPW
FED
HLA Compliant Federates
Integrate Federation (Incremental)
System Integration, Test and Acceptance Plan
SITAP( for Federation)
Problem Report (Opt)
Integrated Federation
Test Documents (Descriptions Cases)
Test Federation (Incremental)
Final Test Report
Implemented Scenarios
Fully Tested Federation
Federation Execution Procedures
26
FEDEP Step 6 Execute Federation Prepare Outputs
27
STEP 6 OPERATE FEDERATION
28
FEDEP Step 7 Analyse Data and Evaluate Results
29
STEP 7 PERFORM EVALUATION
Evaluation Results Library
Execution Data Analysis Results
Analyse Execution Data
Prepared Execution Outputs
Implemented Evaluation
Analyse Federation
Federation Analysis Results
Prepared Execution Outputs
Implemented Evaluation
Evaluate Results
Corrective Actions
Implemented Evaluation
User Feedback
Supplementary Evaluation Data
Process Feedback
Evaluation Objectives
30
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW

• Origins of SEDEP
• Use of SEDEP
• Comparison of steps
• SEDEP Browser

31
SEDEP BROWSER
SEDEP Browser
32
DISCUSSION

• FEDEP/SEDEP relationship
• Are FEDEP/SEDEP complementary or should they
  converge?
• Who will be responsible for maintaining SEDEP?
• Who will be responsible for updating FEDEP with
  SEDEP v2.0 when it comes up for review?
• Should scope of FEDEP be increased?
• Increased number of activities (complexity)
• Describe interface with high-level processes
• Reuse of products
• Iterative use of process
• Provision of Use Cases
• Use of repository
• Specification of Data Interchange Formats
• Provide on-line version of process?

33

• QUESTIONS ?
• keith.ford_at_thales-tts.com
• goran.ancker_at_saab.se