Control Charts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 91
About This Presentation
Title:

Control Charts

Description:

... symmetrical around the ... that are equally rare and use them as flags for instability. ... anything, from the science of management to the physical world ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:99
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 92
Provided by: wilson86
Category:
Tags: around | charts | control | flags | the | world

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Control Charts


1
Control Charts
  • The concept of process variability forms the
    heart of statistical process control.
  • Statistical process control is concerned with
    print production systems operating on target with
    minimum variance.

2
Two types of Process Variation
  • Natural process variation, frequently called
    common cause or system variation, is the
    naturally occurring fluctuation or variation
    inherent in all processes.
  • Special cause variation is typically caused by
    some problem or anomaly in the system.

3
Control Charts are a methodology
  • for analyzing a process and quickly determining
    when it is out of control
  • It is out of control when a special cause
    variation is present because something unusual is
    occurring in the process

4
A process is controlled when through the use
of past experiencewe can predict how the
process is expected to behave in the future.
5
Control Charts Defined
  • Control charts are used to analyze and control
    the output of a process by measuring and
    monitoring key characteristics of the product.
  • When the characteristics are measured or counted,
    the results are plotted on a chart that contains
    control limits.
  • The location of the data points relative to the
    control limits indicates whether the process is,
    at that moment, in control.

6
Stability is a time-related
  • A histogram gives a picture of overall
    variability, but tells nothing about time-related
    variation, or stability.
  • The control chart is similar in concept to the
    histogram, with the important difference that the
    data is displayed as a function of time.
  • The time-related nature of process behavior is
    discovered when the order of production is
    preserved.
  • Decisions on whether to change a process or leave
    it alone are often best made on the basis of
    immediate past performance.

7
Types of Control Charts
There are many different types of control charts
depending on the type of data being analyzed. We
will cover several based on variables.
  • X Chart data collected as individual
    measurements
  • Xbar and R Charts data collected in small units
    called subgroups
  • (sampling
    distributions)

8
To implement Control Charts -these concepts must
be understood
  • Mean the average value for all the data
  • Standard Deviation average variation around the
    mean
  • Central Limit Theorem average of means from
    multiple samples are normally distributed

9
Normal DistributionLike most statistical process
control, time charts are based on the bell shaped
pattern common to the measurements from
industrial processes
  • Measurements tend to cluster around a central
    point called the mean - xbar
  • Data are symmetrical around the mean
  • Standard deviations are located at equal
    distances from each other

10
Normal Distribution
  • The proportion of measurements located between
    the mean and the standard deviation is a
    constant, where
  • Mean - 1s 68
  • Mean - 2s 95
  • Mean - 3s 99.7

11
Constructing a X Control Chart based on
individual measurements
  • Collect the data one at a time, based on a
    systematic random sample, and record in the order
    of occurrence
  • Calculate the average of the data and draw it in
    as the center line on the graph
  • Plot the data in a sequence obtained from left to
    right
  • The limits are based on the average process
    variation, known as the standard deviation

12
In general the chart contains a center line that
represents the mean value for the in-control
process. Two other horizontal lines, called the
upper control limit (UCL) and the lower control
limit (LCL) are also shown on the chart.
13
Plus or minus "3 sigma" limits are typical
  • In the U.S it is an acceptable practice to base
    the control limits upon a multiple of the
    standard deviation.
  • Usually this multiple is 3 and thus the limits
    are called 3-sigma limits. ( / - 3 standard
    deviations)
  • Approximately 99.7 of the measurements fall
    between /- 3 sigma from the mean
  • There is only a .3 likelihood that a point
    falling outside of 3 sigma represents a natural
    occurrence, rather than a change in the process.

14
  • The process above is in apparent statistical
    control. Notice that all points lie within the
    upper control limits (UCL) and the lower control
    limits (LCL). This process exhibits only common
    cause variation.

15
  • The process above is out of statistical control
    at the fifth data point. This single point can be
    found outside the control limits (above them).
    This means that a source of special cause
    variation is present at that time. The likelihood
    of this happening by chance is only about 3 in
    1,000.

16
Typical cycle in SPC
  • the process is highly variable and out of
    statistical control.
  • as special causes of variation are found and
    fixed, the process comes into statistical control
  • through process improvement, variation is
    reduced, control limits are narrowed

17
  • Eliminating special cause variation keeps the
    process in control
  • process improvement
  • reduces the process variation and moves the
    control limits in toward the centerline of the
    process.

18
Strategies for detecting out-of-control
conditions
  • If a data point falls outside the control limits,
    we assume that the process is probably out of
    control and that an investigation is warranted to
    find and eliminate the cause or causes.
  • This does not mean that when all points fall
    within the limits, the process is in control.

19
If the plot looks non-random it also is not
in-control
  • if the data points exhibit some form of
    systematic behavior, there is still something
    wrong
  • "in control" implies that all points are between
    the control limits and they form a random pattern

20
General rules for detecting out of control
situations
21
If the plot looks non-random it also is not
in-control
  • Any Point Above or below 3 Sigma
  • 2 Out of the Last 3 Points Above or below 2 Sigma
  • 4 Out of the Last 5 Points Above or below 1
    Sigma
  • 8 Consecutive Points Above or below Control Line
  • 6 in a row trending up or down
  • 14 in a row alternating up and down

22

Trend Rules for detecting out of control or
non-random situations
6 in a row trending up or down
14 in a row alternating up and down
23
These Rules are based on Probability
  • For a normal distribution, the probability of
    encountering a point outside 3 sigma is 0.3.
  • This is a rare event (about 3 out of 1000)
  • Therefore, if we observe a point outside the
    control limits, we conclude the process has
    shifted and is unstable.

24
Rules are based on Probability
  • Similarly, we can identify other events that are
    equally rare and use them as flags for
    instability.
  • The probability of observing
  • two points out of three in a row
  • between 2
    sigma and 3 sigma
  • or
  • four points out of five in a
    row
  • between 1
    sigma and 2 sigma
  • is also
    about 0.3.

25
Types of Errors 3-sigma Control Limits are a
good balance point between two types of errors
  • Type I or alpha errors occur when a point falls
    outside the control limits even though no special
    cause exists. The result is a witch-hunt for
    special causes and unnecessary process
    adjustment. The tampering usually distorts a
    stable process as well as wasting time and
    energy.
  • Type II or beta errors occur when you miss a
    special cause because the chart isn't sensitive
    enough to detect it. In this case, you will go
    along unaware that the problem exists and thus
    unable to fix it.

26
Types of errors
  • All process control is vulnerable to these Type I
    and Type II errors.
  • The reason that 3-sigma control limits balance
    the risk of error is that, for normally
    distributed data, data points will fall inside
    3-sigma limits 99.7 of the time when a process
    is in control.
  • This makes the witch hunts infrequent but still
    makes it likely that unusual causes of variation
    will be detected.

27
Control Limits vs. Specifications
  • Control Limits are used to determine if the
    process is in a state of statistical control.
  • (is producing consistent output)
  • Specification Limits are used to determine if the
    product will function in the intended fashion.

28
Control Limits vs. Specifications
  • Control limits are derived from the actual output
    of the process, while specification limits are
    imposed on the process
  • Control limits should be well within the
    specification limits
  • Control limits should be centered on the midpoint
    of the specification

29
Control Limits vs. Specifications
  • A capable process is one where almost all the
    measurements fall inside the specification
    limits.

30
Process Capability Index
  • We are often required to compare the output of a
    stable process with the process specifications to
    make a statement about how well the process meets
    specification.
  • To do this we compare the process specification
    limits with the natural variability of a stable
    process. 

Process Capability Index Cp USL LSL
6 s
31
Value of Cp for Different Processes
  • Cp lt 1.0 the process is not capable
  • When Cp 1.00 the process is just capable
  • As Cp gt 1.00 the process becomes more capable

32
All control charts have three basic components
  • a centerline, usually the mathematical average of
    all the samples plotted.
  • upper and lower statistical control limits that
    define the constraints of common cause
    variations.
  • performance data plotted over time.

33
Control Charts based on Sampling
Distributions
  • X-bar chart - the sample means are plotted in
    order to control the average value
  • R chart - the sample ranges are plotted in order
    to control the variability

34
(No Transcript)
35
Importance of Subgroups and Averages
  • Individual readings taken from a process may not
    always be normally distributed
  • If data is collected from a process in subgroups
    and the average of these is used instead of
    individual readings, the resulting distribution
    will always approach a normal distribution
  • This is The Central Limit Theorem

36
X-Bar and R Charts
The two types of charts go together when
monitoring variables, because they measure the
two critical parameters central tendency and
dispersion.
37
It is possible that an out-of-control signal will
appear on one kind of chart and not the other.
38
All control charts have three basic components
  • a centerline, usually the mathematical average of
    all the samples plotted.
  • upper and lower statistical control limits that
    define the constraints of common cause
    variations.
  • performance data plotted over time.

39
Common Cause
UCL
X
SCALE
LCL
40
Special Cause
UCL
X
SCALE
LCL
41
Variables Control Chart
Out ofcontrol
Abnormal variationdue to assignable sources
1020
UCL
1010
1000
Mean
Normal variationdue to chance
990
LCL
980
Abnormal variationdue to assignable sources
970
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Sample number
42
If the plot looks non-random it also is not
in-control
  • Any Point Above or below 3 Sigma
  • 2 Out of the Last 3 Points Above or below 2 Sigma
  • 4 Out of the Last 5 Points Above or below 1
    Sigma
  • 8 Consecutive Points Above or below Control Line
  • 6 in a row trending up or down
  • 14 in a row alternating up and down

43
Control Charts based on Sampling Distributions
  • X-bar chart - the sample means are plotted in
    order to control the average value
  • R chart - the sample ranges are plotted in order
    to control the variability

44
Importance of Subgroups and Averages
  • Individual readings taken from a process may not
    always be normally distributed
  • If data is collected from a process in subgroups
    and the average of these is used instead of
    individual readings, the resulting distribution
    will always approach a normal distribution This
    is
  • The Central Limit Theorem

45
(No Transcript)
46
Observations from Sample Distribution
Sample number
47
X-Bar and R Charts
The two types of charts go together when
monitoring variables, because they measure the
two critical parameters central tendency and
dispersion.
48
It is possible that an out-of-control signal will
appear on one kind of chart and not the other.
49
Mean and Range Charts
Detects shift
Does notdetect shift
R-chart
50
Mean and Range Charts
UCL
LCL
Does notdetect shift
51
X-Bar and R Control Charts
The X-Bar Chart and the R Chart are not only used
together, they are calculated from the same raw
data.
Consider that we have a precision made piece
coming off of an assembly line. We wish to see if
the process resulting in the object diameter is
in control.
52
X-Bar and R Control Charts Procedure
Take a sample of FIVE objects and measure each.
Calculate the average of the five. This is one
data point for the X-Bar Chart. Calculate the
range (largest minus smallest) of the five. This
is one data point for the R Chart.
53
X-Bar and R Control Charts Procedure
Repeat these two steps twenty (20) times. You
will have 20 "X-Bar" points and 20 "R" points.
54
X-Bar and R Control Charts Procedure
Calculate the average of the 20 X bar points-
yes, the average of the averages. This value is
X Double Bar, and is the centerline of the
X-Bar Chart.
55
X-Bar and R Control Charts Procedure
Calculate the average of the twenty R points.
This is called R Bar This is the centerline of
the R chart, and also is used in calculating the
control limits for both the X-Bar chart and the R
chart.
56
The Only Tricky Part
  • Calculating the upper and lower control limits
    for the X-Bar and R control charts, and the
    process standard deviation.
  • Use the following equations for our example
  • diameter of precision made piece coming off of an
    assembly line
  • (sample size of
    FIVE)

57
X-Bar Control Limits
Upper Control Limit for X-Bar chart X double
bar .577 R bar Lower Control Limit for
X-Bar chart X double bar - .577 R bar
58
R Control Limits
Upper Control Limit for R Chart 2.11
Rbar Lower Control Limit for R Chart 0
Rbar
59
X-Bar and R Control Charts Procedure
Plot the original X Bar and R points, twenty of
each, on the respective X and R control
charts. Identify points which fall outside of
the control limits. These points are due to
unanticipated or unacceptable causes.
60
X-Bar and R Control Charts Procedure
The sample size is traditionally 5, as in our
example. Control charts can and do use sample
sizes other than 5, but the control limit
factors, derived by statisticians, change (for
our example .577 for the X-Bar chart)
61
X-Bar Control Charts
Find the UCL and LCL using the following
equations UCL X double bar (A2)Rbar CL X
double bar LCL X double bar - (A2)Rbar
62
R Control Charts
Find the UCL and LCL with the following formulas
UCL (D4)Rbar CL Rbar LCL(D3)Rbar with
D3 and D4 can be found in the following table
63
Samples of 5
64
X-Bar Control Limits

65
R Control Limits
66
(No Transcript)
67
X Bar-r-chart
  • The process standard deviation for each graph is
    calculated by a formula based on the average of
    the range values, (Rbar), and another table.

68
Pareto Principle
  • The Vital Few and Trivial Many Rule
  • Predictable Imbalance
  • 8020 Rule

69
Named after Vilfredo Pareto -an Italian economist
  • He observed in 1906 that 20 of the Italian
    population owned 80 of Italy's wealth
  • He then noticed that 20 of the pea pods in his
    garden accounted for 80 of his pea crop each
    year

70
The Pareto Principle
  • A small number of causes is responsible for a
    large percentage of the effect-
  • -usually a 20-percent to 80-percent ratio.
  • This basic principle translates well into quality
    problems - most quality problems result from a
    small number of causes.
  • You can apply this ratio to almost anything, from
    the science of management to the physical world

71
Addressing the most troublesome 20 of the
problem will solve 80 of it.   Within your
process, 20 of the individuals will cause 80 of
your headaches.   Of all the solutions you
identify, about 20 are likely to remain viable
after adequate analysis. 80 of the work is
usually done by 20 of the people.
72
80 of the quality can be gotten in 20 of the
time -- perfection takes 5 times longer 20 of
the defects cause 80 of the problems. Project
Managers know that 20 of the work (the first 10
and the last 10) consume 80 of the time and
resources.
73
A Pareto chart is a useful tool for graphically
depicting these and other relationships It is a
simple Histogram style graph that ranks problems
in order of magnitude to determine the priorities
for improvement activities The goal is to target
the largest potential improvement area then move
on to the next, then next, and in so doing
address the area of most benefit first The chart
can help show you where allocating time, human,
and financial resources will yield the best
results.
74
While the rule is not an absolute, one should use
it as a guide and reference point to ask whether
or not you are truly focusing on 20 - The
Vital Few or 80 - The Trivial Many True
progress results from a consistent focus on the
20 most critical objectives.
the
75
The simplicity of the Pareto concept makes it
prone to be underestimated and overlooked as a
key tool for quality improvement. Generally,
individuals tend to think they know the important
problem areas requiring attention if they
really know, why do problem areas still exist?
76
Although the idea is quite simple, to gain a
working knowledge of the Pareto Principle and its
application, it is necessary to understand the
following basic elements
77
Pareto Analysis
  • Creating an tabular array of representative
    sample data that ranks the parts to the whole
  • with the objective to use the facts to find the
    highest concentration of quality improvement
    potential in the fewest number of projects or
    remedies
  • Thus achieving the highest return for the
    investment.

78
Pareto Analysis of Printing Defects
79
Pareto Diagram
  • The Category Contribution, the causes of whatever
    is being investigated, are listed across the
    bottom, and a percentage is assigned for each
    (Relative Frequency) to total 100. A vertical
    bar chart is constructed, from left to right, in
    order of magnitude, using the percentages for
    each category.

80
Pareto Diagram is a combined bar chart and line
diagram based on cumulative percentages.
80 improvement in quality or performance can
reasonably be expected by eliminating 20 of the
causes of unacceptable quality or performance
81
Pareto Diagram of Total Printing Defects
82
(No Transcript)
83
Relative Frequency
  • (Category Contribution) / (Total of all
    Categories) x 100 expressed in bar chart form.

84
Cumulative Frequency
  • (Relative Frequency of Category Contribution)
    (Previous Cumulative Frequency) expressed as a
    line graph

85
Break Point
  • The percentage point on the line graph for
    Cumulative Frequency at which there is a
    significant decrease in the slope of the plotted
    line

86
Vital Few
  • Category Contributions that appear to the left of
    the Break Point account for the bulk of the
    effect

87
Trivial Many
  • Category Contributions that appear to the right
    of the Break Point, which account for the least
    of the effect.

88
Pareto Diagram Analysis
  • Pareto analysis provides the mechanism to control
    and direct effort by fact, not by emotion.
  • It helps to clearly establish top priorities and
    to identify both profitable and unprofitable
    targets.
  • In addition to selecting and defining key
    quality improvement programs

89
  • Prioritize problems, goals, and objectives
  • Identify root causes
  • Select key customer relations and service
    programs
  • Select key employee relations improvement
    programs
  • Select and define key performance improvement
    programs
  • Address the Vital Few and the Trivial Many causes
    of nonconformance
  • Maximize research and product development time
  • Verify operating procedures and manufacturing
    processes
  • Product or services sales and distribution
  • Allocate physical, financial and human resources

90
For a General Manager
The value of the Pareto Principle is that it
focuses efforts on the 20 percent that matters.
Of the things you do during your day, only 20
percent really matter. Those 20 percent produce
80 percent of your results. Identify and focus
on those things.
91
To Create a Pareto Chart   Select the items
(problems, issues, actions, defects, etc.) to be
compared.   Select a standard for measurement.
  Gather necessary data Arrange the items on
the horizontal axis in a descending order
according to the measurements you selected.
  Draw a bar graph where the height is the
measurement you selected.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com