What Were Covering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

What Were Covering

Description:

including Hewitt original work on Fortune Magazine 'Best 100 Cos to Work For' in U.S. ... Globe & Mail Report on Business Magazine 'Best 50 Employers in Canada' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: kel127
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What Were Covering


1
(No Transcript)
2
What Were Covering
  • What is human resource engagement?
  • Whats its connection with retention and the
    bottom line?
  • What drives engagement?
  • What differentiates Best Employers from The
    Rest?
  • Lessons learned from the Best Employer studies
  • Which drivers/work environment factors are most
    critical?
  • Suggested actions for organizations seeking to
    improve engagement

1
3
About the Best Employers Studies
  • Evolved out of more than 30 years survey work
  • including Hewitt original work on Fortune
    Magazine Best 100 Cos to Work For in U.S.
  • 7th year for The Globe Mail Report on Business
    Magazine Best 50 Employers in Canada
  • 2nd year for joint Queens/Hewitt Best
    Small-to-Medium Employers in Canada (lt400
    employees)
  • More than 300 organizations and 75,000 employee
    inputs in database plus..
  • Links to Hewitt U.S. and global database
  • A key ingredient Studies based on employee views
  • Endorsed and validated by Queens School of
    Business

2
4
How important are attraction, retention, and
motivation of key talent in your organization?
3
5
Organization Results Chain
People Work/Values Opportunities
RetentionTalent AttractionProductivity
Work EnvironmentFactors
Employee Engagement
OrganizationalResults
Service DeliveryShareholder ReturnCash
Flow/Growth
Quality of LifeHR ProceduresTotal Rewards
Say-Stay-Strive
4
6
What is Engagement?
  • Concept researched and developed over many years
    of hands-on Client work in Canada and around
    the world
  • We define in very specific behavioural terms
  • Not about happiness, loyalty, satisfaction,
    or positive ratings of workplace conditions
    alone
  • A measurable state of emotional and intellectual
    involvement or commitment of the workforce to
    organizational success
  • Central determinant of ranking in our Best
    Employers studies
  • Strong correlations with business results

5
7
Whats an Engaged Employee?
  • An engaged employee is one who willingly
    self-describes him/herself as exhibiting three
    key sets of behaviours
  • Best Employersthose with highly engaged
    employeeshave people on board who, according to
    measurements taken
  • Speak positively about the organization to
    co-workers, potential employees, and customers
    (We call this the Say element)
  • Have an intense desire to be part of the
    organization (We call this the Stay element)
  • Exert extra effort and are dedicated to doing the
    very best job possible to contribute to the
    organizations business success (We call this the
    Strive element)

6
8
Why Be a Best Employer?
  • There is clear evidence that increasing employee
    engagement leads to improved organizational
    results
  • Key findings from the 2005 Best Employers Study

Difference
The BestThe Rest
Financial Measures (last 5 years, 55 publicly
traded participants)
7
9
Process of Disengagement
8
10
Engagement Scores
9
11
Six Key Engagement Questions
  • (Say 1)
  • I would, without hesitation, highly recommend
    this organization to a friend seeking
    employment
  • (Say 2)
  • Given the opportunity, I tell others great
    things about working here
  • (Stay 1)
  • It would take a lot to get me to leave this
    organization
  • (Stay 2)
  • I hardly ever think about leaving this
    organization to work somewhere else
  • (Strive 1)
  • This organization inspires me to do my best
    work every day
  • (Strive 2)
  • This organization motivates me to do more than
    is normally required to complete my work

10
12
Engagement Scores Breakdown
  • Positive Perception

11
13
So, what work environment factors are known to
have meaningful impact on engagement?
12
14
Engagement Model Diagram
13
15
Key Work Environment Factors
  • Positive Perception

14
16
Zeroing in on Specific Engagement Drivers
  • Senior Leadership (Key Survey Item)
  • I see strong evidence of effective leadership
    from the leadership/senior team in Canada
  • Manager (Key Survey Item)
  • My manager (the person you report to) provides
    the support I need to succeed
  • Co-workers (Key Survey Item)
  • My co-workers respect my thoughts and feelings
  • Career Opportunities (Key Survey Item)
  • My future career opportunities here look good
  • Development Opportunities (Key Survey Item)
  • This organization supports the growth and
    development of its employees

15
17
Engagement Driver Scores
Positive Perception
16
18
Zeroing in on Specific Engagement Drivers
  • Pay (Key Survey Item)
  • My pay is appropriate for the role I have in
    this organization
  • Benefits (Key Survey Item)
  • My benefits meet my (and my familys) needs
    well
  • Recognition (Key Survey Item)
  • I receive adequate recognition (beyond
    compensation) for my contributions and/or
    accomplishments
  • People Practices (Key Survey Item)
  • Our people practices create a positive work
    environment for me
  • Performance Management (Key Survey Item)
  • The performance review process helps me focus
    my work effort to help this organization achieve
    its goals

17
19
Engagement Driver Scores
  • Positive Perception

18
20
Zeroing in on Specific Engagement Drivers
  • Intrinsic Motivation (Key Survey Item)
  • I get a sense of accomplishment from my work
  • Resources (Key Survey Item)
  • The work processes we have in place allow me to
    be as productive as possible
  • Corporate Citizenship (Key Survey Item)
  • I am certain that our business creates
    something that adds value to our community
  • Work/Life Balance (Key Survey Item)
  • The balance between my work and personal
    commitments is right for me
  • Physical Work Environment (Key Survey Item)
  • The physical work environment is appropriate
    for the kind of work I do

19
21
Engagement Driver Scores
  • Positive Perception

20
22
Which drivers do you work on to improve
engagement?Measuring satisfaction is not
enoughSome drivers have significantly more
impact than others
21
23
Improving Engagement
  • Smallest Gaps/Opportunities in Engagement Drive
    Scores
  • Percent Difference in Positive Perception

22
24
Improving Engagement
  • Moderate Gaps/Opportunities in Engagement Drive
    Scores
  • Percent Difference in Positive Perception

23
25
Improving Engagement
  • Greatest Gaps/Opportunities in Engagement Drive
    Scores
  • Percent Difference in Positive Perception

24
26
Can we get even more specific about
engagement-improving actions and workplace
factors?Drilling deeper into the high-impact
drivers..
25
27
A Closer Look Performance Management
  • Positive Perception on Sampling of Key Work
    Experiences

26
28
A Closer Look Development Career Opportunities
Positive Perception
27
29
A Closer Look Sr. Leadership
Positive Perception on Sampling of Key
Behaviours
28
26
30
A Closer Look Pay
Positive Perception on Sampling of Detailed
Views
29
31
Lessons Learned from Best Employer Studies
  • Engagement, retention, and bottom line, in fact
    closely linked
  • No single formula or recipe evident for
    maintaining/improving engagement (each
    organization is unique in its own ways)
  • Multitude of factors drive engagement
  • Selected drivers do broadly appear to have more
    impact than others
  • Role of senior leadership
  • Handling the HR basics (people practices,
    policies, programs)
  • Performance managementgoals-oriented planning
    review
  • Sufficiency/quality of opportunities for personal
    learning, growth, and career development
  • Areas of least positive perception are not
    necessarily the greatest opportunities to improve
    engagement
  • Employee perceptions of their workplace
    experience are realities to them (but may not
    match their leaders perceptions)

30
32
Our Recommendations Guidance
  • Measure engagement--take the pulse of the
    organization regularly and periodically in-depth
  • Focus on one or two critical issues (drivers and
    sub-drivers) at a time to institute improvements
  • Consolidate, reinforce, and maintain strength in
    positively-perceived areas
  • Make engagement measurement and improvement a
    corporate priority (not an HR program)
  • Pay special attention to senior leadership
    deployment
  • Ensure HR people practice basics executed
    consistently and well
  • Build quality individual performance planning and
    review processes
  • Attend to developmental needs and career
    aspirations of key talent

31
33
  • For further information and/or highlights of this
    presentation, contact
  • Einar Westerlund
  • Queens Centre for Business Venturing
  • Queens School of Business
  • Email ewesterlund_at_queensu.ca
  • Direct Line (Toronto) 416.461.3258
  • Toll Free to Kingston 1.877.955.1800

32
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com