Title: Upper-limit on Sco X-1 S2 preliminary results
1Upper-limit on Sco X-1S2 preliminary results
- C Messenger, V Re and A Vecchio
- on behalf of PULG
- LSC General Meeting
- LHO, 10th 13th November 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
2Outline
- Astrophysical scenario
- Data analysis
- General
- S2 approach
- S2 preliminary results
- Future work
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
3Astrophysical scenario
- Observational evidence that rotation frequencies
in Low Mass X-Ray Binaries (LMXB) are - Well below NS breaking frequency
- Clustered in a narrow (237 Hz 619 Hz) frequency
range (Bildsten, 1998 Chakrabarty et al, 2003) - Currently, two are the proposed mechanisms
- Magnetic braking (Wang and Zang, 1997), but need
for fine tuning of parameters - Gravitational waves (Bildsten, 1998)
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
4GWs from accreting neutron stars
- Conjecture for LMXBs GWs are the limiting
physics that prevents NSs from being spun-up to
the braking frequency - Two models
- Density fluctuations mountain on neutron star
(Bildsten, 1998 Ushomirsky, Cutler, Bildsten,
2000 Cutler, 2002) - fgw 2 frot
- R-modes (Andersson et al, 1999 Wagoner, 2002)
- fgw 4/3 frot
(from Cutler and Thorne 2000)
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
5Data analysis
- Source position known
- Orbital motion
- Circular orbit to a very good approximation
- Search with discrete mesh over 3 orbital
parameters (period, projected orbit semi-major
axis, initial phase) - Phase Doppler shift much more severe than for
isolated sources - Signal confined to a single bin for Tobs lt 150
sec (Sco X-1) - .Df 0.2 Hz (Sco X-1)
P binary period q m2/mNS
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
6Data analysis (cont)
- Intrinsic change in GW frequency (spin down)
- System is in equilibrium GW emission balances
accretion torque frequency makes a random walk
as the accretion rate (Mdot) changes in time - We can not model this frequency evolution using
low-order polinomial in time - However, the signal is confined to a single
frequency by for Tobs lt 2 weeks -
- Rotation frequency, and therefore GW frequency,
not very well known Df 1 40 Hz
t time scale over which torque doubles or turns
off
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
7Computationally bound search
- Computational load comes from two poorly
constrained set of parameters - Emission frequency search over a fairly large
bandwidth (tens of Hz) - Orbital parameters (Sco X-1 N_filt 106 for 1
day of coherent integration) - Long integration times
- Search strategy
- Hierarchical (Hough transform/stack-slide)
- Coherent integration over Tc
- Concatenate incoherently M chunks of length Tc
(total observation time M Tc) - Possibly run on the Grid
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
8Approach for S2 analysis
- Target Sco X-1 (the brightest source)
- The analysis can be extended in a straightforward
way (in principle) to the other LMXBs - Coherent analysis over
- Relevant band for emission at twice the rotation
frequency (but if enough processing power is
available well explore band for 4/3 rotation
frequency) - The longest possible observation time for
available computational resources (Birmingham
cluster Tsunami 200 CPUs) - T(coherent) lt 1/2 day
- Frequency domain analysis (different flavour of
analysis carried out for S1)
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
9Schematic of pipeline
Sco X-1 coordinates
Data 60 sec long FFTs
Demodulation Compute F statistic
Sco X-1 orbital parameters
Template bank
Vetoes Select candidates
Upper-limit
S2 preliminary results
Monte Carlos
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
10Scorpius X-1
- Neutron star in a binary system accreting from a
low-mass (0.42 M_sun) companion - Distance 2.8 (/- 0.2) kpc
- Orbital parameters
- Period 0.787313(1) day 18.9 hrs
- Projected semi-major axis 1.990 sec lt a lt 2.213
sec - Initial orbital phase Da 0.1 rad
- Circular orbit (e lt 10-3)
- Rotation frequency from twin kHz QPOs (van der
Klis et al, 1997 van der Klis, 2000) - 232 242 Hz
- 302 312 Hz
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
11S2 preliminary analysis
- One-stage coherent FD analysis (F statistic)
- Tobs 3 hrs (set by Tanalysis 1 week on 100
CPUs) - Same data segment for L1, H1 and H2
- Search carried out over
- Wide frequency band
- lower band 464 484 Hz
- upper band 604 624 Hz
- Discrete mesh over 2D parameter space (10
mismatch) - Period known to high accuracy (not a search
parameter for Tobs lt 1 month) - Mesh on a and a 39,487 filters (upper-band)
- Frequentist upper-limits on ten 4 Hz wide bands
covering the relevant frequency range
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
12Choice of data segment
High sensitivity segment during S2 for all the
three detectors in both bands GPS times
734238015 lt t lt 734249072 corresponding to Tobs
11,057 sec
464 484 Hz
604 624 Hz
H1
H2
L1
S2
S2
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
13Lower band 464 476 Hz
- 464 468 Hz fairly noisy band in all 3 IFOs
(2F 66 116) - 468 476 Hz is a quiet band results consistent
with noise only (2F 50) for L1, H1 and H2
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
14Lower band 476 484 Hz
- Extremely noisy band
- Strongly contaminated by broad feature at 480 Hz
- 2F 100 1200 depending on IFO
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
15Upper band 604 624 Hz
- Quiet band
- Results consistent with noise only (2F 50) for
L1 and H1 - H2 is slightly noisier (2F 55-60)
16Summary of preliminary UL
h0 3x10-21
h0 2x10-21
h0 10-21
h0 5x10-22
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
17Summary
- Angle-averaged upper-limit at 95 confidence is
h0(95) 5x10-22 - 3x10-21 depending on
detector and frequency band (but only 2 frot) - No analysis has been carried out on the band
corresponding to 4/3 frot - Main limitation of current analysis
- Lack of veto procedure (crucial for f 480 Hz)
- We are implementing the test currently being used
for isolated pulsars
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z
18Work plan
- November
- Include vetoing stage
- Re-run analysis
- Perform additional tests/checks on the entire
pipeline - Make final
- Trade-offs
- Search optimisation
- Select Tobs for S2 and data segment
- December
- Run S2 analysis
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003
LIGO-G030585-00-Z