Upper-limit on Sco X-1 S2 preliminary results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Upper-limit on Sco X-1 S2 preliminary results

Description:

... 5x10-22 - 3x10-21 depending on detector and frequency band (but only 2 frot) No analysis has been carried out on the band corresponding to 4/3 frot ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: AlbertoV150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Upper-limit on Sco X-1 S2 preliminary results


1
Upper-limit on Sco X-1S2 preliminary results
  • C Messenger, V Re and A Vecchio
  • on behalf of PULG
  • LSC General Meeting
  • LHO, 10th 13th November 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
2
Outline
  • Astrophysical scenario
  • Data analysis
  • General
  • S2 approach
  • S2 preliminary results
  • Future work

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
3
Astrophysical scenario
  • Observational evidence that rotation frequencies
    in Low Mass X-Ray Binaries (LMXB) are
  • Well below NS breaking frequency
  • Clustered in a narrow (237 Hz 619 Hz) frequency
    range (Bildsten, 1998 Chakrabarty et al, 2003)
  • Currently, two are the proposed mechanisms
  • Magnetic braking (Wang and Zang, 1997), but need
    for fine tuning of parameters
  • Gravitational waves (Bildsten, 1998)

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
4
GWs from accreting neutron stars
  • Conjecture for LMXBs GWs are the limiting
    physics that prevents NSs from being spun-up to
    the braking frequency
  • Two models
  • Density fluctuations mountain on neutron star
    (Bildsten, 1998 Ushomirsky, Cutler, Bildsten,
    2000 Cutler, 2002)
  • fgw 2 frot
  • R-modes (Andersson et al, 1999 Wagoner, 2002)
  • fgw 4/3 frot

(from Cutler and Thorne 2000)
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
5
Data analysis
  • Source position known
  • Orbital motion
  • Circular orbit to a very good approximation
  • Search with discrete mesh over 3 orbital
    parameters (period, projected orbit semi-major
    axis, initial phase)
  • Phase Doppler shift much more severe than for
    isolated sources
  • Signal confined to a single bin for Tobs lt 150
    sec (Sco X-1)
  • .Df 0.2 Hz (Sco X-1)

P binary period q m2/mNS
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
6
Data analysis (cont)
  • Intrinsic change in GW frequency (spin down)
  • System is in equilibrium GW emission balances
    accretion torque frequency makes a random walk
    as the accretion rate (Mdot) changes in time
  • We can not model this frequency evolution using
    low-order polinomial in time
  • However, the signal is confined to a single
    frequency by for Tobs lt 2 weeks
  • Rotation frequency, and therefore GW frequency,
    not very well known Df 1 40 Hz

t time scale over which torque doubles or turns
off
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
7
Computationally bound search
  • Computational load comes from two poorly
    constrained set of parameters
  • Emission frequency search over a fairly large
    bandwidth (tens of Hz)
  • Orbital parameters (Sco X-1 N_filt 106 for 1
    day of coherent integration)
  • Long integration times
  • Search strategy
  • Hierarchical (Hough transform/stack-slide)
  • Coherent integration over Tc
  • Concatenate incoherently M chunks of length Tc
    (total observation time M Tc)
  • Possibly run on the Grid

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
8
Approach for S2 analysis
  • Target Sco X-1 (the brightest source)
  • The analysis can be extended in a straightforward
    way (in principle) to the other LMXBs
  • Coherent analysis over
  • Relevant band for emission at twice the rotation
    frequency (but if enough processing power is
    available well explore band for 4/3 rotation
    frequency)
  • The longest possible observation time for
    available computational resources (Birmingham
    cluster Tsunami 200 CPUs)
  • T(coherent) lt 1/2 day
  • Frequency domain analysis (different flavour of
    analysis carried out for S1)

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
9
Schematic of pipeline
Sco X-1 coordinates
Data 60 sec long FFTs
Demodulation Compute F statistic
Sco X-1 orbital parameters
Template bank
Vetoes Select candidates
Upper-limit
S2 preliminary results
Monte Carlos
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
10
Scorpius X-1
  • Neutron star in a binary system accreting from a
    low-mass (0.42 M_sun) companion
  • Distance 2.8 (/- 0.2) kpc
  • Orbital parameters
  • Period 0.787313(1) day 18.9 hrs
  • Projected semi-major axis 1.990 sec lt a lt 2.213
    sec
  • Initial orbital phase Da 0.1 rad
  • Circular orbit (e lt 10-3)
  • Rotation frequency from twin kHz QPOs (van der
    Klis et al, 1997 van der Klis, 2000)
  • 232 242 Hz
  • 302 312 Hz

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
11
S2 preliminary analysis
  • One-stage coherent FD analysis (F statistic)
  • Tobs 3 hrs (set by Tanalysis 1 week on 100
    CPUs)
  • Same data segment for L1, H1 and H2
  • Search carried out over
  • Wide frequency band
  • lower band 464 484 Hz
  • upper band 604 624 Hz
  • Discrete mesh over 2D parameter space (10
    mismatch)
  • Period known to high accuracy (not a search
    parameter for Tobs lt 1 month)
  • Mesh on a and a 39,487 filters (upper-band)
  • Frequentist upper-limits on ten 4 Hz wide bands
    covering the relevant frequency range

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
12
Choice of data segment
High sensitivity segment during S2 for all the
three detectors in both bands GPS times
734238015 lt t lt 734249072 corresponding to Tobs
11,057 sec
464 484 Hz
604 624 Hz
H1
H2
L1
S2
S2
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
13
Lower band 464 476 Hz
  • 464 468 Hz fairly noisy band in all 3 IFOs
    (2F 66 116)
  • 468 476 Hz is a quiet band results consistent
    with noise only (2F 50) for L1, H1 and H2

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
14
Lower band 476 484 Hz
  • Extremely noisy band
  • Strongly contaminated by broad feature at 480 Hz
  • 2F 100 1200 depending on IFO

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
15
Upper band 604 624 Hz
  • Quiet band
  • Results consistent with noise only (2F 50) for
    L1 and H1
  • H2 is slightly noisier (2F 55-60)

16
Summary of preliminary UL
h0 3x10-21
h0 2x10-21
h0 10-21
h0 5x10-22
LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
17
Summary
  • Angle-averaged upper-limit at 95 confidence is
    h0(95) 5x10-22 - 3x10-21 depending on
    detector and frequency band (but only 2 frot)
  • No analysis has been carried out on the band
    corresponding to 4/3 frot
  • Main limitation of current analysis
  • Lack of veto procedure (crucial for f 480 Hz)
  • We are implementing the test currently being used
    for isolated pulsars

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
18
Work plan
  • November
  • Include vetoing stage
  • Re-run analysis
  • Perform additional tests/checks on the entire
    pipeline
  • Make final
  • Trade-offs
  • Search optimisation
  • Select Tobs for S2 and data segment
  • December
  • Run S2 analysis

LSC Meeting, LHO 10th 13th November, 2003

LIGO-G030585-00-Z
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com