AML and Treating Customers FairlyTuesday 10 March

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

AML and Treating Customers FairlyTuesday 10 March

Description:

The Financial Regulator's changing role in AML and Financial ... Guidance Notes but unlike FSA, AML has not been part of Financial Regulator's core mandate. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: brendannag

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AML and Treating Customers FairlyTuesday 10 March


1
The Financial Regulators changing role in AML
and Financial Crime
  • Presenter
  • Brendan Nagle

2
Third Money Laundering Directive status
  • Parliamentary Counsel currently working on
    producing a Bill from Department of Justice
    Scheme.
  • Quick reminder of the shape of the law on AML
    FATF international recommendations ? EU
    Directives 2005/60/EC and 2006/70/EC ? Irish
    Primary Legislation supplemented by Core and
    Sectoral Industry Guidance Notes
  • The key point is that Financial Regulator is to
    become a competent authority for the purposes
    of the Directive
  • Role-changing article 37 means Regulators will be
    responsible for ensuring that credit and
    financial institutions have adequate AML-CTF
    infrastructures in place.

3
Financial Regulators current role
  • Has been limited to making suspicious transaction
    reports to FIU.
  • There has been some scrutiny, in the course of
    RFSP inspections of compliance with the Guidance
    Notes but unlike FSA, AML has not been part of
    Financial Regulators core mandate.
  • Financial Regulator would of course have made
    reports to the Garda Síochána and Revenue
    Commissioners where suspicions arose of offences
    being committed under the CJA94.

4
Financial Regulators proposed role Main
(Draft) Provisions
  • Definitions Head 2 of Department of Justice draft
    'scheme will to designate the Financial
    Regulator as a Competent Authority for the
    purposes of the new legislation.
  • Head 28 will transpose the key, role-changing
    article 37 of the Directive (text of article/head
    attached in slide note)
  • Article 37 of the Directive requires Member
    States Competent Authorities to take necessary
    measures to ensure compliance with the
    requirements of the Directive. (Art.37 is
    attached to this slides notes).
  • Accordingly, the law will require us to use the
    powers listed in following slide to ensure credit
    and financial institutions establish AML-CTF
    infrastructures appropriate to combat the money
    laundering or terrorist financing risks posed by
    their businesses.

5
Financial Regulators proposed role Main
(Draft) Provisions Provisions
  • Head 34 will permit the Financial Regulator to
    appoint authorised officers with standard
    inspection powers
  • Head 29 will allow the Financial Regulator to
    issue written requests for records.
  • Head 30 will allow the Financial Regulator to
    issue directions
  • Head 31 will allow the Financial Regulator to use
    its administrative sanction powers

6
Distinction between our role and that of the FIU
  • Suspicions of actual, indictable ML activity -
    Gardai and the Director of Public Prosecutions
    will remain responsible for the investigation and
    eventual prosecution of indictable offences of
    laundering money, or financing terrorism.
  • Findings of infrastructural deficiencies - The
    Financial Regulators role will be to
  • raise awareness of combating ML-TF in industry
  • encourage adoption of proper AML-CTF procedures
  • administratively sanction (where necessary)
    credit or financial institutions failures to
    establish adequate AML-CTF infrastructures

7
Raising awareness see new site
  • Local law and resources are at
  • Useful international guidance paper for your
    industry see Appendix C in particular for your
    AML manuals

8
Whats this got to do with ethics, fairness and
service to customers?
  • On the downside - there may be an
    access-restricting effect, but here, financial
    Regulator has requested inclusion of text of the
    Guidance Notes, which ensure access to financial
    services.
  • On the upside, the 3rd directives new CDD and
    ongoing monitoring requirements may remind
    firms of the need to detect ID theft and
    preventing abuse of vulnerable customers.
  • Discussion point Is CDD an additional
    administrative burden, or is it just a different
    angle on CRM. Knowing your customer and good
    customer relations management are one and the
    same.

9
Cases
  • Internet bank - Blue-rinse lady and Deutche
    Bundespost.
  • High value goods - Car show room case just
    before the Ireland France match
  • Life assurance 1990 UK case, life assurance
    sales agent was convicted of violating a UK
    anti-money laundering legislation. Money
    laundering scheme - over USD 1.5 million
    deposited with bank. The second phase layering
    process involved the purchase of single premium
    insurance policies. Agent won his companys award
    for sales efforts. His supervisor was also
    charged with money laundering. Case illustrates
    how an insurance company can be exposed to
    negative publicity and possible criminal
    liability by a corrupt employee.
  • I.D. Thief Abraham Abdallah

10
Measures to prevent financial crime 1. CDD
risk based
  • Identify your customer and verify his/her/its
    identity using reliable, independent source
    documents, data or information
  • Determine whether the he/she/it is acting on
    behalf of another person, and then taking
    reasonable steps to obtain sufficient
    identification data to verify the identity of
    that other person
  • identify the (ultimate) beneficial owner of your
    customer. Understand the ownership and control
    structure of corporate customers
  • Be clear on the purpose and intended nature of
    new business relationships
  • Conduct ongoing due diligence on customers and
    scrutinise transactions throughout the course of
    that relationship so as to check they are
    consistent with the your (the insurers)
    knowledge of the customer and his her its
    business and risk profile.

11
CDD continued
  • The extent of Customer Due Diligence varies
    according to risk profile of customer, the
    business relationship and transaction.
  • Enhanced due diligence is called for with respect
    to higher risk categories. Decisions taken on
    establishing relationships with higher risk
    customers and/or beneficial owners should be
    taken by senior management. Subject to national
    legal requirements insurers may apply reduced or
    simplified measures in the case of low risk
    categories.

12
Measures to prevent financial crime 2. Maintain
records
  • Keep them secure for five years
  • Electronic Storage

13
Measures to prevent financial crime 3. Train
staff
  • MLRO in place?
  • AML Manual (however brief)?
  • What are they to watch out for?
  • Whats the risk profile of your customers?
  • Is simplified due diligence or enhanced due
    diligence possible / required in some instances?
  • Desk-top training / seminar?

14
Measures to prevent financial crime 4. Make
reports to FIU
  • Insurers should ensure that
  • there is a clear procedure for staff to report
    suspicions of money laundering and the financing
    of terrorism without delay to the compliance
    officer
  • there is a clear procedure for reporting
    suspicions of money laundering and the financing
    of terrorism without delay to the FIU, and
  • all staff know to whom (internal or external)
    their suspicions should be reported.

15
Questions
16
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)