Management of New York City - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Management of New York City

Description:

Located primarily West of the Hudson River. Rural, mountainous watershed ... East of Hudson Non-Point Source Control Program $43,000,000 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: x3
Learn more at: https://unece.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Management of New York City


1
Management of New York Citys Watershed
  • Michael A. Principe, Ph.D.
  • Deputy Commissioner
  • New York City
  • Department of Environmental Protection
  • Bureau of Water Supply
  • October 10, 2005

2
Presentation Outline
  • Development of NYCs Watershed Protection Program
  • Costs and Funding
  • Contractual Mechanisms Supporting Watershed
    Protection
  • Major Program Elements

3
  • Primarily a surface water supply
  • 19 reservoirs 3 controlled lakes
  • System Capacity 550 billion gallons (over 2
    billion kiloliters)
  • Serves 9 million people (1/2 of population of New
    York State)
  • Delivers approx. 1.2 billion gallons (4.5 million
    kiloliters) per day to the City
  • Source of water is a 2,000 square mile (5,180
    square kilometer) watershed in parts of 8 upstate
    counties
  • Operated and maintained by NYCDEP

4
CATSKILL AND DELAWARE SUPPLIES
  • Located primarily West of the Hudson River
  • Rural, mountainous watershed
  • 70 forested, low population, significant
    agricultural uses
  • Shallow soils and porous rock produce high
    quality water
  • City has Filtration Avoidance Determination for
    these supplies

5
(No Transcript)
6

Governmental Agencies Involved in Watershed
Protection
  • Program involves agencies from
  • Federal (USEPA)
  • State
  • New York City
  • 8 upstate counties
  • 60 towns and villages
  • Crosses multiple jurisdictions, all outside of
    NYC
  • New York has strong home rule tradition

7

Issues Driving City to Watershed Protection
  • The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1986 and the
    Surface Water Treatment Rule of 1989 established
    objective and subjective criteria for avoidance
  • Concern over whether City could meet subjective
    criteria
  • City owned less than 8 of watershed
  • City regulations outmoded
  • City alarmed by potential cost of filtration
    plant (originally estimated at 4-8 billion)
  • Firm belief by NYC that reliance on end-of-pipe
    solutions alone is not prudent best approach is
    to protect quality of water at its source

8
Development of Watershed Protection Program
  • DEP received first filtration waiver from EPA in
    1993
  • Waiver conditioned on implementation of
    protection programs
  • DEP designed comprehensive monitoring program to
    assess threats to water quality
  • Based on assessment of threats, management
    programs designed and implemented

9
Watershed Memorandum of Agreement
  • MOA established collaborative approach between
    City, State, watershed residents, environmental
    groups and regulators
  • Signed in 1997
  • Allowed City to proceed with Watershed
    Regulations, Land Acquisition and Partnership
    Programs
  • City had to agree to fund programs

10
Contractual Arrangements
  • DEP contracted with local public, private and
    non-profit entities to use City ratepayer funding
    to implement programs
  • Groups include Catskill Watershed Corporation,
    Agricultural Council and county agencies
  • All contracts subject to City procurement rules

11
Catskill Watershed Corporation
  • MOA created the Catskill Watershed Corporation
    (CWC)
  • CWC comprised of local representatives
  • Voting rights apportioned based on percent of
    land in watershed
  • CWC provided with 160 million of City funding
    for wastewater, stormwater and economic
    development programs

12
How is Watershed Protection Funded?
  • DEP is funded by water and sewer rates
  • Revenues and expenses are managed by the New York
    City Municipal Water Finance Authority, an
    independent entity established in 1984
  • Revenues collected by the Water Finance Authority
    are independent from other NYC funding and cannot
    be diverted to other NYC programs
  • The Water Finance Authority collected 1.7
    billion in 2004. 900 million of this was used
    for water supply operations and debt service

13
Water Sewer Rate Structure
  • Water rate 1.65 per 100 cubic feet
  • Average single-family house pays about 220/year
    for water
  • Sewer rate 2.62 per 100 cubic feet
  • Consumption decreased by nearly one-third since
    1980s due to conservation
  • NYC rates are lower than most major US cities
    including Dallas, Los Angeles, Washington, Boston
    and Atlanta

14
Watershed Protection Program
15
Types of Watershed Protection Programs
  • Protection Programs Designed to prevent future
    degradation of water quality large scale and
    evaluated over the long-term.
  • Remediation Programs Designed to address
    specific problems and are expected to result in
    measurable decreases in pollutants small scale
    and evaluated over the short-term.

16
Watershed Protection ProgramsRemedial
Protective
  • Stormwater Controls
  • WWTP Upgrades
  • Sewer Extensions
  • Septic System Rehabilitation
  • Salt Sand Storage
  • Stream Corridor Protection
  • Watershed Rules Regulations
  • Land Acquisition
  • Agricultural Programs
  • Forestry Management

17
Major Watershed Protection Program Elements
  • Land Acquisition Program
  • More than 385,000 acres (156,000 hectares)
    solicited
  • 68,000 acres (27,660 hectares) acquired/under
    contract
  • 21,000 acres (8,565 hectares) under contract
    for Agricultural Easements

18
Major Watershed Protection Program Elements
  •  Partnership Programs
  • 2,000 failing septic systems remediated
  • Nearly 50 stormwater retrofits funded
  • 44 stormwater BMPs installed
  • Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) being
    upgraded to tertiary treatment (25 WOH, 70 EOH)
  • 7 new WWTPs being constructed
  • Watershed Agricultural Program
  • 2900 Best Management Practices (BMPs)
    implemented
  • 1,775 miles (2,857 km) of stream buffers
    protected through Conservation Reserve
    Enhancement Program
  • New initiatives on small farms and EOH farms

19
Grommeck Farm During Construction
20
Following Best Management Practice (BMP)
Implementation
21
One year after BMP Implementation
22
Major Watershed Protection Program Elements
  • Watershed Rules and Regulations
  • Updated in 1997 to address WWTPs, septic systems
    and stormwater runoff
  • Designed to protect sensitive areas streams,
    wetlands, reservoirs and steep slopes
  • 1,000s of projects reviewed to date
  • Coordinated field inspection and patrol with
    Engineering and NYCDEP Police
  • City funds most costs of compliance

23
DELAWARE RESERVOIR BASIN
  • Heavy agricultural uses
  • 4 large wastewater treatment plants
  • Excessive nutrient loading to reservoir led to
    eutrophication

24
Watershed Protection Provides Results
25
What does watershed protection cost?
Program Cost
New Infrastructure Program (1st 7 communities) 96,664,016
Community Wastewater Program (5 communities) 10,000,000
Septic Rehabilitation Maintenance Programs 30,100,000
Sewer Extension Program 10,000,000
Wastewater Plant Upgrades (non-City-owned) 272,000,000
Wastewater Plant Upgrades (City-owned) 271,000,000
Alternate Design Septic System Program 3,000,000
Stormwater Retrofits 15,175,000
Future Stormwater Controls 31,700,000
Farms Forestry 91,000,000
Land Acquisition (includes farm easements) 295,000,000
Stream Management Program 28,000,000
Kensico Water Quality Protection Program 43,000,000
East of Hudson Non-Point Source Control Program 68,000,000
Miscellaneous Programs - CFF, Good Neighbor, etc. 97,300,000
Catskill/Delaware UV Plant 670,000,000
Total 2,031,939,016

26
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com