The Worlds Most Fascinating Sphere - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

The Worlds Most Fascinating Sphere

Description:

The Worlds Most Fascinating Sphere – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: ats85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Worlds Most Fascinating Sphere


1
The Worlds MostFascinating Sphere
2
Myths Misconceptions
  • Dimples like a snow tire
  • Dimples increase drag
  • Dimples create lift
  • Put over spin on the ball for more distance

3
I want to see the effects!
4
  • I History

II. Theory
IV. Results
III. Research
5
HISTORY
6
Feathery 1400s - 1880s
7
Gutta-percha 1850s-1900s
8
Hand Hammered Gutta-Percha
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Typical Ball Today
  • 300-400 dimples
  • USGA standards
  • Diameter no less
  • than 1.680 inches
  • Weight no more
  • than 1.620 ounces
  • Spherically Symmetrical

12
THEORY
13
Aerodynamic Forces on a Body
p
t
  • Pressure p - acts normal
  • Shear stress t - acts tangential

14
Resultant Force, R
  • Parameters
  • U8, velocity
  • d, diameter (r, radius)
  • v, rotational velocity
  • r8, density of air
  • µ8, viscosity of air
  • k, surface roughness
  • R (U8,d,v,r8, µ8, k)

U, velocity of ball
R, resultant force
g( , , )
CR g(Re, , ?)
15
Lift and Drag Coefficients
Lift
  • CL g1(Re, , ?)
  • CD g2(Re, , ?)
  • CL
  • CD

U, velocity
Resultant
Drag
16
Reynolds Number (Re)
  • Inertial forces / viscous forces
  • Re
  • Re Values 104 105 106
  • Golf Ball Re 60,000 - 220,000
  • Determines Laminar or
  • Turbulent Flow

17
Laminar Flow
Van Dyke
18
Turbulent Flow
Van Dyke
19
Flow Similarity
  • Validates Wind Tunnel Testing
  • Flows dynamically similar if
  • Bodies are geometrically similar
  • Similarity parameters the same
  • Reynolds Number (Re)
  • If dynamically similar we know
  • Streamline patterns the same
  • Lift and Drag Coefficients are the same

20
Types of Flow
  • Inviscid - neglecting friction
  • Viscid - including friction

21
Inviscid Flow
  • Bernoullis Equation
  • p 1/2 r U2 constant
  • p pressure
  • - r density
  • U velocity
  • NO lift, NO drag

U8 170 mph
3/2 U8, highest velocity 255 mph
22
Viscid Flow
  • Friction / Shear stress - t
  • Velocity gradient
  • Friction occurs in the boundary layer

23
Boundary Layer
b
Ball surface
Ub 255 mph
a
Ua 0
Boundary Layer (thickness greatly exaggerated)
  • Zero velocity relative to the surface,
    no-slip
  • Large velocity gradients exist in the BL

24
Boundary Layer - Velocity Profile
255 mph
b
a
Ua 0
Thickness of the boundary layer of golf ball is
1 of its diameter at 100,000 Re
25
Pressure Drag - Flow Separation
26
Flow Separation - Adverse Pressure Gradient
Flow likes to move from HIGH pressure to LOW
pressure
Adverse Pressure Gradient
Low pressure
High Pressure
Top of the boundary layer
Surface of the ball
27
Effect of Re on Flow Separation
28
(No Transcript)
29
Experimental Drag on a Smooth Sphere
E. Achenbach 1972
30
Boundary Layer Transition
Laminar
Turbulent
Van Dyke
Separation Points
31
Velocity Profiles
n
Top of the Boundary Layer
Surface
32
Experimental Drag on a Smooth Sphere
Golf Ball Re Range
E. Achenbach
33
Effect of Surface Roughness on Critical Reynolds
Number
Golf Ball
E. Achenbach 1973
34
Comparison with Golf Ball Critical Reynolds Number
Golf Ball
P W Bearman and J K Harvey 1976
35
Magnus Effect
  • Berlin, Germany 1852
  • A force is created by a spinning symmetrical body
  • Occurs in baseball, tennis, soccer, table tennis,
    cricket, external ballistics (spinning bullets)

36
The Creation of Lift Pressure Imbalance
U v
U
v
-v
U
Swirling Boundary Layer
U - v
Non-lifting Flow
Lifting Flow
Spin is Key!
  • Higher-than-normal velocity on the top lower
    pressure
  • Lower-than-normal velocity on the bottom higher
    pressure
  • Pressure imbalance Lift force

37
The Creation of Lift Momentum
U8
Ball not spinning Wake
Ball Spinning Wake
Non- Symmetric Separation Points
Symmetric Separation Points
38
Asymmetrical Separation Points
delayed
advanced
39
RESEARCH
  • The main goal of my investigation was to learn
    the effects of spin and dimples on the
    aerodynamics of golf balls and employ flow
    visualization to see the effects.

40
Georgia Tech Research InstituteWind Tunnel
  • Closed-return type
  • re-circulating air
  • Max speed 200 ft/s

41
Test Section 30 H x 43 W x 90 L
42
Wind Tunnel Balance
43
Apparatus Assembly
Tunnel floor
Tunnel floor
Balance plate
Balance plate
44
Models
  • 5 balls
  • (3) Dimpled
  • (1) Smooth
  • (1) Rough
  • 8 inches diameter
  • Stereolithography Apparatus (SLA)
  • Styrofoam covered with fiberglass cloth

45
Dimpled Balls
  • 332 circular dimple pattern from Titleist
  • Constant dimple diameter 0.151 in.
  • Variable dimple depth
  • Too Shallow (TS) 0.0079 in
  • About Right (AR) 0.0119 in
  • Too Deep (TD) 0.0159 in
  • Paint radius
  • rounding effect
  • significant aerodynamic feature

46
Tests
  • 6 days
  • Measuring
  • CL, CD
  • Velocity 14 mph 80
  • Ball Rpm 200-1500 dimple, rough
  • 200-800 smooth

47
Vibration Video
48
RESULTS
49
(No Transcript)
50
(No Transcript)
51
Flow Separation - Smooth Sphere
52
Flow Separation - Dimpled Sphere
53
Separation Comparison
Early Separation bigger wake more drag
Delayed Separation smaller wake less drag
Smooth Ball
Dimpled Ball
54
Smooth and Rough Spheres with Smoke Video
55
Dimpled Ball with Smoke Movie
56
(No Transcript)
57
(No Transcript)
58
(No Transcript)
59
Conclusion
60
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
  • John Spitzer - USGA, wind tunnel grant
  • Charlie Novak - Lockheed Martin, LSA machine
  • Dean McCallister - Delta Sigma Corp, design
  • Steve Aoyama - Titleist, ball pattern
  • Bob Englar - GTRI, joint endeavor
  • Dr. Adams, data analysis
  • Dr. Peterson, advisor
  • Dr. Cavagnaro, aerodynamics
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com