Our Experiment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Our Experiment

Description:

Our Experiment – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: retg
Category:
Tags: experiment | n4g

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Our Experiment


1
Imaging Energetic Nuclear Particles Author
Cassandra Niman UC San Diego Advisor Dr. Robert
Tribble REU at the Cyclotron Institute Texas
AM University, 2007
  • Semiconductor Detectors
  • Detectors are reverse biased diodes made from
    doped semiconductors
  • The non-conducting depletion zone in the
    pn-junction of the diode is
  • where we can detect particle interactions
  • The current produced from the particle
    interaction with the detector can
  • be used to find the position and energy of the
    charged particles
  • 16 strip detector
  • Front - 16 resistive strips of
  • silicon for position signals
  • Back - One non-resistive sheet of
  • silicon for an energy signal

Our Experiment Purpose To test the
resolution capabilities of a prototype four
corner position sensitive silicon detector
when used with a radioactive nuclear beam of
46V. Also, to determine the energy and position
resolution capabilities and the response in
terms of position linearity for different
shaping times of the amplifier. The
Setup The Detector Mask
Position Calculations
Results Alpha Source Measurements
46V Beam Measurements at MARS
How Does MARS Work?
4 Corner Detector with Mask
Slits
  • Below is position imaging by four single sided
    16
  • silicon strip detectors
  • These are the results of the 12N experiment at
    the
  • Momentum Achromat Recoil Separator (MARS)

Strip Detector
  • Silicon detectors are also used to look at the
    products from
  • nuclear reactions

0.10in
.08in
2in
  • Primary beam from K500
  • Reaction in the gas cell to get a secondary beam
  • Separate the beam by the magnetic rigidity, Br
    p/q, using
  • dipole D1
  • Stop the primary beam with a Faraday cup in the
    coffin
  • Select the desired momentum of the beam with
    slits in
  • the coffin
  • Quadrupole, Q3 and dipole D2 make a momentum
    achromat to
  • get a parallel beam into the velocity filter

0.06in
0.15in
  • The method of particle identification shown
    above uses a
  • telescope and looks at EdE Etotal vs. dE
  • Above right is the dE-Etotal plot showing the
    products of the
  • 12N 12C reaction at 12A MeV

0.20in
0.04in for all
The design of the mask allows us to see the
position resolution capabilities of the detector.
Even in the region of the mask with the smallest
spacing of holes, the holes are distinguishable.
Using the alpha source gives very poor position
resolution (gt5mm)
  • Velocity Filter and dipole D3 make mass
    selection,
  • m/q in the y-direction
  • Washington University uses double sided 32 x 32
    silicon strip
  • detectors for position reconstruction
  • Below are the results of the 10C experiment at
    MARS
  • at Texas AM

Position signal shaping time 1µs Energy signal
shaping time 1µs
Position signal shaping time 1µs Energy signal
shaping time 3µs
  • Using a resistive silicon strip detector we can
    see the
  • energy lost by the beam in the detector vs. y
    ( vertical
  • position)
  • We can pick out a particular beam by closing the
    slits in
  • the y-direction
  • For this experiment we were trying to get a beam
    of 46V
  • Above the full beam after going through MARS
  • Below the beam after the slits are used to
    select 46V with
  • 97 purity

Comparing results with different energy shaping
times there seems to be less distortion with a
larger energy shaping time.
Position signal shaping time 6µs Energy signal
shaping time 6µs
Position signal shaping time 3µs Energy signal
shaping time 6µs
  • We tested the four corner
  • detector as a target
  • detector at the end of the
  • MARS beam line
  • For this experiment we
  • were trying to get a beam
  • of 18Ne
  • The four corner detector
  • gives better position
  • resolution, 1mm, than
  • the strip detectors whose
  • position resolution is
  • limited to the width
  • of the strip, 3mm

Comparing results with the same energy shaping
time of 6µs the better position resolution is
found when using a smaller shaping time.
Also see the results for the 18Ne tests to the
far left bottom. This shows position and energy
resolution of this detector.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com