KOREAN AIR FLIGHT 801 CRASH: A CASE STUDY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

KOREAN AIR FLIGHT 801 CRASH: A CASE STUDY

Description:

NTSB/FAA simulation indicated that, without the inhibition, MSAW would have ... NTSB concluded that FAA's quality assurance of MSAW was inadequate. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:616
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: ideaEn
Category:
Tags: air | case | crash | flight | korean | study | ntsb

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: KOREAN AIR FLIGHT 801 CRASH: A CASE STUDY


1
KOREAN AIR FLIGHT 801 CRASH A CASE STUDY
  • Vidyadhar Rangojoo

2
The Incident.
  • Korean Airlines Flight 801 crashes into terrain
    on approach to Won Pat Intl airport, Guam. The
    impact site lies at 658ft on Nimitz Hill.
  • Death toll 237. Survivals 28.
  • Classified as a Controlled-flight-into-terrain
    (CFIT) accident.

3
Wreckage of Flight 801
4
Wreckage of Flight 801
The Crash site
5
Wreckage of Flight 801CONTD
KAL 801 after the crash
6
Wreckage of Flight 801
Ariel view
7
Reasons for the crash
  • Complex combination of events
  • Glide slope not operational.
  • Pilot error.
  • Inhibition of Minimum Safe Altitude Warning
  • System
  • Ground based controller.
  • Alerts controllers visually/aurally when tracked
    flight descend below a predetermined min safe
    altitude.

8
Reasons for the crash (CONTD)
  • FAA changed a safety critical system without
    reexamining the scenario the system addressed.
  • FAA allowed Guam to operate normally despite
    having two safety-critical systems out of
    service.

9
MSAW General Monitoring
Minimum Safe Altitude (MSA)
Terrain Clearance Altitude
10
MSAW System Overview
  • 1990 System configured to monitor area within
    55-nm radius of the Guam radar.
  • 1993 New system installed citing frequent
    nuisance warnings issued by system.
  • This change reduced MSAW processing to a 1-nm
    ring b/w 54 and 55nm from radar facility.
  • New MSAW software installed at Guam to update
    terrain database includes the inhibition zone.
  • Facility Inspection of this software failed to
    note MSAW inhibition entirely.

11
The Guam MSAW Inhibition zone
MSAW Service Area Boundary (55 nm)
Inhibit Zone (54 nm)
Guam
Pacific Ocean
12
Analysis
  • The glideslope for runway 6L was out of service,
    captain lost awareness of flights position on
    final approach.
  • Altitude callouts by onboard GPWS ignored bye
    flight crew mistaken for nuisance messages over
    Guam.
  • Poor illumination surrounding Nimitz Hill.

13
Effectiveness of MSAW.
  • NTSB/FAA simulation indicated that, without the
    inhibition, MSAW would have generated an alert 64
    seconds before impact.
  • NTSB This would have been sufficient for the
    controller to advise KA 801.
  • NTSB concluded that FAAs quality assurance of
    MSAW was inadequate.

14
Lessons learnt.
  • Configuration management.
  • Human error.

15
Related Incidents
  • Dulles International Airport,1994.
  • Houston Intercontinental Airport,1998.

16
References..
  • Paper titled What should aviation safety
    incidents teach us? by John C. Knight.
  • Paper titled Framing analysis of software
    failure with safety cases .William S. Greenwell,
    John C. Knight .
  • http//www.cnn.com/WORLD/9708/10/guam.crash/
  • http//ns.gov.gu/guam/indexmain.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com