Physics reach vs luminosity goal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Physics reach vs luminosity goal

Description:

J.-P. Koutchouk , CERN/AT/MCS. Thanks to L. Rossi. 10/6/09. CPT and LHC upgrade. 2. 1- Introduction ... The time it takes to reach nominal peak luminosity, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: NIC8180
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Physics reach vs luminosity goal


1
Physics reach vs luminosity goal installation
time for the LHC Luminosity Upgrade A first
look
  • J.-P. Koutchouk , CERN/AT/MCS
  • Thanks to L. Rossi

2
1- Introduction
  • Factors that govern the integrated
    luminosity are
  • The time it takes to reach nominal peak
    luminosity,
  • The effective collision time (turn-around,
    faults, unavailabilities injectors,
    electricity, machine studies,
  • The details of the luminosity decay during a run.
  • Theoretical calculations of any of the
    parameters governing these three aspects (except
    perhaps 3) have to be taken with much caution.
  • The CPT theorem (better fit) is a pragmatic
    approach requiring a complexity to be
    evaluated. For control room people, this says a
    lot the complexity of a storage rings is a
    control room concept.

3
2.- The Model for the LHC luminosity increase
  • Adaptative complexity
  • Found in the range 0.9 -gt 4.3 for p-colliders
    with an average of 2.4.
  • We shall use a strategy of varying complexity
    depending on the closeness of the luminosity to
    the estimated luminosity goal
  • Constant factor linear and quadratic
    dependences on closeness ? c?0.5, 3.5
  • asymptotic increase above luminosity goal
  • Starting at 5 per year and saturating at 20.

4
2.- The Model for the LHC integrated luminosity
  • Exponential decay during run
  • Including beam-beam, IBS and rest-gas
  • Optimal run duration for a 70 minutes turn-around
    time
  • Time planned for physics 107 seconds
  • Machine availability for physics 80
  • Running till 2022.

5
Complexity in the case of no upgrade
6
Luminosity profile in the case of no upgrade
7
Improvement in 1/vN in the case of no upgrade
8
Complexity in the case of the reference upgrade
9
Luminosity profile in the case of the reference
upgrade
10
Improvement in 1/vN in the case of the
reference upgrade
11
Physics reach versus Luminosity goal and year of
upgrade
  • Assumptions
  • Same upgraded beam current kb2, Nb1.7
  • Same strategy for the complexity
  • Same stop for one year to upgrade the detectors
  • Vary the year of upgrade and luminosity goal

12
(No Transcript)
13
Conclusions
  • Working on the complexity appears less
    arbitrary than working directly on luminosity
    profiles.
  • LHC should reach the nominal luminosity in 2012
    in a reasonably optimistic scenario.
  • From 2014, the improvement in statistics becomes
    modest.
  • In the reference scenario where the luminosity
    upgrade was essentially due to the increased
    beam current, 5 years are needed to reach the
    luminosity goal!

14
Conclusions
  • The 10 increase in peak L yields about a factor
    of two of improvement of the statistics
    (precision physics) in this same scenario.
  • The yield of a significantly smaller luminosity
    goal appears then marginal (even if the one year
    shutdown is suppressed).
  • The largest potential of improvement is likely to
    be in a minimization of complexity increase
    related to the upgrade this favors very much
    stronger focusing with a new Xing angle LR
    compensation strategy and no or small increase of
    beam current.
  • Cooking scenarios and calculations to quantify
    the above.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com