Parliamentary and Presidential Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 6
About This Presentation
Title:

Parliamentary and Presidential Systems

Description:

A 'Vote of Confidence' can be called at any time, ... The key distinction is the Separation of Powers. Separation of Powers Doctrine and Checks and Balances... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:149
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 7
Provided by: serv328
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Parliamentary and Presidential Systems


1
Parliamentary and Presidential Systems
  • A Comparison

2
Parliamentary Systems
  • Only one elected body a parliament of
    representatives. Its bills are law.
  • Executive power is housed in a cabinet. Cabinet
    members typically are MPs who perform executive
    duties (foreign relations, etc.) in addition to
    their legislative duties.
  • Cabinet only serves as long as there is
    parliamentary confidence. A Vote of Confidence
    can be called at any time, and a majority vote
    can unseat the existing cabinet (government
    falling) and call for a new one to be formed.
  • But the cabinet can also hold the parliament in
    check. The leader of the cabinet (Prime minister,
    premiere, etc.) can disband a parliament and call
    for new elections.

3
Advantages/Disadvantages of Parliamentary Systems
  • Advantages
  • Always unified government
  • Greater party discipline
  • No veto power and typically no judicial review
  • Clear lines of responsibility voters know who to
    blame/reward
  • Disadvantages
  • Divided government may be a good thing
  • Judicial review and veto power are important
  • Minority rights get washed away
  • What if theres no clear majority? Then coalition
    governments must be formed between the main
    parties, and cabinet positions are divvied up
    accordingly.

4
Committees
  • Nonparliamentary systems are committee dominated
    they have the power, and they can easily
    obstruct the work of government.
  • Strong committees in a parliamentary system would
    weaken central unity Strong leadership is
    important to parl. Systems.
  • Consequently, in Britain, for example, there are
    no standing committees per se, but ad hoc
    committees for each bill. No permanent staff and
    no open hearings, etc
  • The parliament itself tries to maintain the open
    spirit of debate.

5
Presidential Systems
  • The key distinction is the Separation of Powers
  • Separation of Powers Doctrine and Checks and
    Balances
  • Secondly and related to the first point, above
    there are differences in party systems/structures/
    politics/elections

6
Key differences between Presidential and
Parliamentary Systems Compared
  • Policy leadership gt with presidential systems,
    but...
  • Responsibility for policy more difficult to
    identify with presidential systems.
  • Comprehensive policies harder to accomplish in
    presidential systems.
  • Differences in recruitment of leaders.
  • Differences in review/control of executive
    leaders.
  • Symbolic/political aspects.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com