Title: Gas Industry Governance
1Gas Industry Governance
- 2004 New Zealand Petroleum Conference
- Presented by Dr Govind SahaCEO, Saha
International Ltd9 March 2003
Contact details Govind Saha Saha International
Limited Level 4, Clayton Ford House The
Terrace Wellington 6001 NEW ZEALAND Tel. 64
(0)21 395 890 gsaha_at_sahainternational.com
Session Time 455pm 520pm
2Topics
- Current Situation
- Viewpoints
- Government Policy Statement
- Industry viewpoint perspectives
- Governance Models
- Government Policy
- Industry Response
- Lessons from electricity
- Components of governance
- Options
3Current Situation
4The industry maintains a diversity of
organisations and interests
NGC
NGC
NGC
Shell Todd OMV
Maui
Genesis
Genesis
Nova
Nova
Wanganui Gas
Wanganui Gas
Swift Greymouth Southern Others
Methanex Contact 10 Large Users
Powerco Vector
5A depleting gas supply puts pressure on lowest
value-added uses
250
200
150
Gas Delivered in 2002 (PJ)
Electricity Generation
100
50
Consumer energy
0
Source Energy Data File, MED (Calendar Year 2002
data)
6Petrochemical manufacturers may not be able to
compete for higher priced gas
- Methanex announced in November 2003 it was taking
a 130-million writedown on its assets in New
Zealand and at Medicine Hat in Alberta as a
result of a loss of natural gas feedstock at
economical prices. (Toronto Globe Mail 27 Jan
2004) - Methanex has promoted its Atlas plant in Trinidad
(63 JV with BP, 1.7mmtpa, coming onstream Q2
2004) and its Chilean expansion (expected to be
completed next year), which is expected to be
completed in 2005, as part of a strategy to lower
methanol production costs. (Reuters, 29 Jan 2004)
7Gas is needed to meet electricity demand growth
- Was an increased role for
- Geothermal 6.7 ? 6.9
- Gas 1 ? 25.5
- Steam 0.1 ? 1.7
- Wind 0 ? 0.4
- Biogas 0 ? 0.2
- Was a decreased role for
- Hydro 75 ? 61
- Oil 9.6 ? 0
- Coal 6.5 ? 3.8
- Wood 1.5 ? 0.8
Source Energy Data File, MED
8Hydro generation cant meet electricity needs
50,000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
Electricity Generation GWh
25,000
20,000
Total Annual Generation
15,000
Hydro Generation
10,000
5,000
0
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Source Energy Data File, MED. 2002 figures are
estimates. CAE Electricity Supply Demand to
2015. .
Calendar Year
9Hydro generation cant meet electricity needs,
despite Project Aqua
50,000
45,000
6,900 GWh
40,000
35,000
30,000
Electricity Generation GWh
CAE 2012 forecast (expected)
25,000
20,000
Total Annual Generation
15,000
Hydro Generation
10,000
5,000
0
Z
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2012
Source Energy Data File, MED. 2002 figures are
estimates. CAE Electricity Supply Demand to
2015. .
Calendar Year
10Gas is also used to balance hydro generation
fluctuations
30,000
Hydro generation
Gas-fired generation
25,000
20,000
Gas used for generation (PJ)
15,000
Hydro and gas-fired electricity generation GWh/yr
109.8
89.2
92.6
10,000
95.8
97.0
95.2
67.7
5,000
0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Source Energy Data File, MED. 2002 figures are
estimates.
Calendar Year
11Generators await fuel supply certainty before
building new capacity
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
Pre-Maui Peaking Capacity Removed 1997 Marsden
A 114MW Whirinaki 50MW 1998 Whirinaki
50MW 1999 New Plymouth 120MW 2000 Stratford
198MW Whirinaki 50MW
6,000
Net Installed Generating Capacity MW
5,000
4,000
3,000
MED Energy Data Files
2,000
CAE Electricity Supply Demand to 2015
1,000
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
As at March
12Viewpoints
13Government Policy Objectives for gas and
electricity are similar, but independent
- Gas
- The Government's overall policy objective for gas
is to ensure that gas is delivered to existing
and new customers in a safe, efficient, fair,
reliable, and environmentally sustainable manner. - The Government favours industry-led solutions
where possible, but is prepared to use regulatory
solutions where necessary. - Electricity
- The Governments overall objective is to ensure
that electricity is delivered in an efficient,
fair, reliable and environmentally sustainable
manner to all classes of consumer. Consumers
electricity requirements should be met in a
manner which is least-cost to the economy as a
whole over the long term and is consistent with
sustainable development.
Source Government Policy Statement Development
of New Zealand's Gas Industry, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, March 2003
Source Draft Government Policy Statement on
Electricity Governance, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, September 2003
14Gas Industry Government Policy Statement
Requirements
- Production and Wholesale Markets
- protocols, standards and conventions for
quality,balancing, reconciliation - a secondary market
- capacity trading arrangements
- Transmission and Distribution Networks
- an open access regime across all
high-pressuretransmission pipelines - standards and protocols across alldistribution
pipelines - measurement arrangements
- Retail Markets
- standardised upgraded protocols relating to
customer switching - consumer complaints handling
- model consumer contracts
- Gas Safety
- effective, internationally consistent safety
standards conventions. - ensuring competency of all those undertaking gas
work - effective self-audit, monitoring and reporting on
compliance - Open Access to the Maui Pipeline
Source Government Policy Statement Development
of New Zealand's Gas Industry, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, March 2003
15Commerce Commission Gas Control Inquiry
- Before reaching a view on whether control should
be introduced, the Minister has asked for the
Commission to provide, by 1 November 2004,
specific advice on - whether gas pipeline services may be controlled
in terms of section 52 of the Act - the methodology that the Commission considers
appropriate for valuation of pipeline assets for
the purposes of its advice (on the matters
covered in the Minister's letter) - the net benefits to the public of control and
- any other matter that the Commission may think
relevant to a decision on whether control should
be introduced.
Source Commerce Commission Terms of Reference
letterfrom Hon Pete Hodgson, Minister of Energy,
30 April 2003
16Industry work programme
- In response to the Gas Industry Government Policy
Statement the industry formed an interim Gas
Governance Establishment Group (GGEG), and
subsequently formed the Gas Industry Steering
Group (GISG), to facilitate the establishment of
the work programme and structures referred to in
the Government Policy Statement. - the GISG will continue the various work streams
already initiated by the GGEG to meet other
expectations for the sector. These are focused
on the areas of - open access to gas pipelines,
- wholesale gas balancing
- retail customer switching
- gas contingency planning
- consumer complaints arrangements.(Source Phil
James, Deputy Chairman GISG, as reported in
National Gas Review Sept 2003) - So, from its inception, the governance
arrangements do not attempt to meet all the
requirements of the Governments policy.
17Governance Models
18Government Policy on Governance
- The governing entity must
- be representative of all stakeholders, including
consumers - have an independent chair
- have a majority of independent persons (any
director, employee or significant shareholder of
the supply side of the industry does not meet the
test of independence) - have the independent members appointed after
consultation with the Minister of Energy - not operate in the interests of individual
participants, and - have the power to develop and enforce
arrangements consistent with the Government
Policy Statement. - The Government expects the Electricity
Commission, and the Energy Commission if it is
formed, to use persuasion, promotion and the
provision of information and model arrangements
to achieve policy objectives wherever possible.
The regulation-making powers are there as an
incentive for reaching voluntary agreements, to
be used only if necessary.
Source Government Policy Statement Development
of New Zealand's Gas Industry, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, March 2003
Source Speech introducing the Electricity and
Gas Industries Bill - first reading, Hon Pete
Hodgson, Minister of Energy, 6 November 2003
19Government Policy on Governance (cont)
- Provisions establishing the Energy Commission
will not be brought into force with the rest of
the Electricity and Gas Industries Act. They
will be held in abeyance for use only if the
Government decides that the gas industry has
failed to deliver industry rules that meet the
Governments expectations.Advantages of
locating both electricity and gas regulatory
functions in an Energy Commission are that the
interrelationships between the two sectors can be
better addressed and the skills and experience of
the regulatory staff are likely to span both
sectors.
Source Electricity and Gas Industries Bill28
October 2003 No. 86-1
20Gas Industry Responses
- Maui Mining Companies
- 31 January 2003 Document Release Maui will seek
to provide a pro-competitive and flexible gas
transport regime developed on the principles
expressed in the Access Code and good
international practice. - January 2004 An open access regime on the Maui
pipeline is still to be agreed. - NGC
- January 2004 Details of NGCs post-Maui
transmission regime have still to be announced - Gas Industry Steering Group
- 18 June 2003 Media Release The formation of
the GISG is consistent with the Governments
expectation of a governing entity that is
independently chaired and is representative of
all stakeholders, including consumers. However,
the Group is keen to see further representation
from upstream participants, given the importance
of the exploration and production sector to the
overall future development of the industry. - So, from inception there are concerns about the
degree of representation - GISG is reportedly proposing a co-regulatory
model, whereby rule-making is undertaken by the
industry and rule enforcement based on a
government-regulated licencing arrangement. The
rule coverage would include pipeline access, but
would exclude tariff setting. Only minor changes
are expected to be required to the Bill currently
under consideration.
21Lessons from electricity1. Four years after
the inquiry, governance is still not fully
established
22Lessons from Self Governance in Electricity2.
Governance projects need funding and proponents
to succeed
- MARIA Metering and Reconciliation Information
Agreement - Very successful
- Precursor to all others. Established
reconciliation, enabled title tracking. - Proponents funding ECNZ, Transpower
significant industry input - NZEM New Zealand Electricity Market Agreement
- Relatively successful
- Generator dominated, relied on industry structure
that merged upstream downstream interests in
Gentailers - Proponents funding ECNZ, Transpower
significant industry input - MACQS Multilateral Agreement on Common Quality
Standards - Never really got going.
- Proponents funding Transpower significant
industry input - EGB Electricity Governance Board.
- Failed
- Not complete commonality of interest
- Commercial interests could not be compromised
- Proponents funding Electricity generating
industry significant industry input
23Components of a Governance Regime
- Rule making
- Rule enforcement
- Rule coverage
- Rule implementation operation
- Funding
24Interests of the parties
- Industry Members
- Maintain existing property rights existing
contracts - Improve future prospects (raise barriers to
competition, not take on excessive risk etc) - Maintain a sustainable market position
- Avoid taking on responsibility without control
- Seek a fair allocation of risk, costs etc
- Consumers
- Improve future prospects (reduce future prices
and improved service product quality) - Government
- Be seen to be ensuring that the product is
delivered in an efficient, fair, reliable and
environmentally sustainable manner - Minimise risk
- Satisfy political constituents
- An extremely low propensity for risk means that
it is often prepared to pay to avoid non-supply
(taking on the Maui ToP contract, responsibility
for the funding of electricity reserve
generation).
25Components of a Governance Regime Issues
- Rule making
- Requires more funding than an industry is often
prepared to allocate. Free-rider issues may
occur. - May require one or more strong proponents
- Industry and consumers were not able to agree on
market governance rules for electricity, so
Government intervened - Rule enforcement
- Through legislation if the rule-making is by
Government - Through multilateral contracts if the rule-making
is by industry consumers. Requires that
contracts are agreed and signed by all.
Ultimately, the signatory may need to be excluded
if the contract is breached. - Rule coverage
- The wider the industry coverage, the less likely
self governance will work. - Rule implementation operation
- Can be contracted out, especially if rules are
fully proscribed. - Funding
- Ultimately is funded by the customer or the tax
payer - Arrangements should minimally distort investment
and consumption behaviours.
26Governance of Gas versus Electricity
27Industry-wide self-governance
- It has been widely believed that the industry can
prepare better governance rules than the
government - Outcome will depend on funding, commitment,
objectives of the proponents, and time-frames.
Government is committed but has little appetite
for funding. A fragmented industry has mixed
commitment and issues with funding. - The short time-frames may result in industry
participants being asked to take on more risk
than they would like. This may be alleviated by
improved metering. - A major problem with self governance is to get
all players to sign up to the arrangements.
Options include - licensing requirements imposed by Government to
make self-governance mandatory (as reportedly
proposed by the GISG) - a contractual cascade (for example, initiated by
a transmission contract from a monopoly SOE) - constrain the coverage of the self-governance
arrangements to parties with like interests.
28Legislated governance
- May be slower to implement than industry-led
governance - Design phase will require external experts rather
than industry members - New Zealands supplies of consumer energy are
arguably in as precarious a position as they were
during the 1970s oil crisis. Legislated
governance provides an opportunity for
coordinating an infrastructural response to the
risk of gas and electricity non-supply, covering
gas exploration and alternatives such as LNG
imports.
29Conclusions
- Governance structures take a considerable amount
of time to establish. The gas industry does not
have the luxury of time. - Industry-led arrangements require strong
proponents with deep pockets. - For an essential service, some government
oversight of the governance arrangements is going
to be likely (especially if there are no major
state owned players in the market?). - While a fully centralised energy planning
approach may no longer be needed, it could be
noted that the energy issues now facing the
country are similar to those we faced in the
70s, which led to the establishment of a
dedicated Energy Ministry.