Title: WithinSubjects Design
1Within-Subjects Design
2Outline
- Assigning Participants to Conditions
- Between-Subjects Design (yesterday)
- Within-Subjects Design (today)
- Characteristics
- Advantages disadvantages
- Order effects
- Threats to internal validity
- Dealing with threats
3Within-Subjects Design Example
- IV (2 levels)
- Talking on cell phone while driving
- Driving while under the influence
- DV
- Performance on driving task
- Results
4Characteristics of Within-Subjects Designs
- Uses a single group of Ps and tests or observes
each individual in all of the different groups
being compared - Often called a repeated-measures design
5Advantages of Within-Subjects Designs
- Dont need as many Ps
- e.g., consider a study that has 3 conditions and
the E wants to run 30 Ps per condition - Eliminates individual differences/person
confounds!!
6Disadvantages of Within-Subjects Designs
- Two Categories
- Order Effects
- Carryover Effects
- Progressive Error
- Time-Related Threats
7Disadvantages of Within-Subjects Designs Order
Effects
- Carryover Effects
- More specific kinds of carryover effects
- Interference Effects
- Contrast Effects
8Disadvantages of Within-Subjects Designs Order
Effects, cont.
- Carryover Effects
- Interference Effects
- Contrast Effects
9Disadvantages of Within-Subjects Designs, cont.
- Please provide a brief, one word answer to each
of the following questions. - Try to answer each question as quickly as
possible
10Disadvantages of Within-Subjects Designs Order
Effects, cont.
- Carryover Effects
- Interference Effects
- Contrast Effects
11Contrast Effects (Strack, Martin Schwarz, 1988)
- Order A
- What is your general life satisfaction?
- What is your dating frequency?
- Order B
- What is your dating frequency?
- What is your general life satisfaction?
12Disadvantages of Within-Subjects Designs Order
Effects, cont.
- Progressive Error
-
- Not related to specific treatment or treatment
conditions - More specific kinds of Progressive Error
- Practice Effects
- Progressive improvement in performance over time
- Fatigue Effects
- Progressive decline in performance over time
13Time-Related Threats
- History
- Environmental events other than the treatment
that occur between the first and last tx
condition - Maturation
- Any systematic changes in an individuals
physiology or psychology occurring over time - Instrumentation
- Changes in the measuring instrument over time
- Regression toward the mean
- The tendency for extreme scores to revert to the
mean
14Dealing with Threats and Effects
- Consider an experiment with 4 treatment
conditions - Ps go through condition 1 first followed by
condition 2, then condition 3, then condition 4 - Condition 4 may be in trouble
- May be influenced by order effects and
time-related threats!
15Dealing with Threats and Effects, cont.
- Counterbalancing to the rescue!
- Goal is to use every possible order
of treatments with an equal of Ps
taking part in each sequence - Many different kinds
16Counterbalancing
- Types of Counterbalancing
- Complete counterbalancing
- Incomplete counterbalancing
- Reverse counterbalancing
- Partial counterbalancing
- Latin square
17Counterbalancing, cont.
- Complete Counterbalancing
- 2 conditions
- AB BA
- 3 conditions
- ABC ACB BAC CAB CBA BCA
18Counterbalancing, cont.
- Reverse Counterbalancing
- ABCDE EDCBA
19Counterbalancing, cont.
- Partial Counterbalancing
- ABCDE CEDAB
- ACBDE CBDAE
- BCDAE EBCDA
- BDAEC EDBAC
20Counterbalancing, cont.
- Latin Square
- 4 conditions ABCD
- Start with a 4x4 matrix
- List the letters ABCD in order. This line of
letters forms the first row of the matrix. To
create the next row, simply move the last letter
in line to the beginning. This creates DABC for
the second row. Continue moving the last letter
to the beginning of the line to create each new
row. The result is the following Latin Square
21Latin Square
- A B C D
- D A B C
- C D A B
- B C D A
- By definition, a Latin square is a matrix of n
elements (letters) where each element appears
exactly once in each column and in each row
22Dealing with Threats and Effects, cont.
- Counterbalancing doesnt erase the threats and
effects, it just unconfounds them with particular
treatment conditions - One last problem
- Ps may have figured out your hypothesis
- Can you figure out what Ps are thinking?
- Structured debriefing
23Structured Debriefing
- Determine what Ps thought the study was about
- Just askor provide some options
24Structured Debriefing, cont.
- Did the experiment seem fun? Boring?
- Did anything seem confusing?
- What did you think of the feedback that you
received? - Did anything seem odd or unusual to you? If so,
at what point did that part appear odd? - How believable did this experiment seem to you?
- What, if anything, seemed unbelievable?
25Within or Between? That is the question
- Within-subjects designs are great
- Some experiments are impossible to conduct using
a within-subjects design - Use between-subjects design to eliminate any
sequence or carryover effects, and time-related
effects
26Tuesday
- Complex Designs
- After this lecture, can start on Homework 2
- Due Tuesday, March 6th
- Cozby, Chapter 10