In the Name of Allah, the Most

1

• In the Name of Allah, the Most
• Compassionate, the Most Merciful

2
PERSONAL ACTION PLAN

• 
  Shazia khanum
• The Aga Khan
  University
• Pakistan.

3
Key lessons learnt from PPME course

• 1-Facilitating in theoretical approach
• a- Tools of stakeholder analysis ( GOPP, RAAKS,
  Venn Diagram DFID).
• b- Participatory tools Techniques ( Rich
  picture, Matrix analysis issue analysis).
• c- Differentiation between different concepts (
  i.e. M. system and M. plan etc).
• d- Situational Analysis
• e- Participatory approaches (from PRA to PLA) .
• 2- Facilitating in Practical approach (Action
  Plan)
• a- Greater emphasis on participation (not only
  in planning but also in ME and briefly in whole
  project cycle ).
• b- Facilitation
• c- Scientific ME system (Pre-requisites
  foundations for establishing an ME system).

4
Objective ( Action Plan) Developing an
improved ME system coinciding with impact
assessment of the Project.

• For achieving this objective following areas
  demand more attention
• Detailed analysis of project ME system for
  making it more effective flexible.
• Project impact assessment through evaluation of
  set performance questions and Indicators.
• Improved stakeholders participation in all the
  phases of project cycle.
• Enhanced capacities of regional district teams
  through PPME trainings.

5
Roles and Actions
Involved Stakeholders Why Involved? My Role Role of stakeholders
Ministry of Health Donors - Creating a part. discussion forum. - Sharing of PPME tools methods. - As facilitator for new ME system dev. - Encourage part. - Dev. Of an improved ME system coinciding with impact assessment.
Ministry of Education Donors - Creating a part. discussion forum. - Sharing of PPME tools methods. - As facilitator for new ME system dev. - Encourage part. - Dev. Of an improved ME system coinciding with impact assessment.
Ministry of Women Dev. Donors - Creating a part. discussion forum. - Sharing of PPME tools methods. - As facilitator for new ME system dev. - Encourage part. - Dev. Of an improved ME system coinciding with impact assessment.
Partner NGOs Project' executing bodies - Creating a part. discussion forum. - Sharing of PPME tools methods. - As facilitator for new ME system dev. - Encourage part. - Dev. Of an improved ME system coinciding with impact assessment.
Education deptt. Officers Responsible for appropriate functioning of schools. - Creating a part. discussion forum. - Sharing of PPME tools methods. - As facilitator for new ME system dev. - Facilitation in ME at grass root level. - Regular contact with STCs teachers.
Medical Practitioners providing Micro Macro nutrients to children at school. Organizing reflective meetings Enhancing ME capacities. - Facilitation in ME at grass root level. - Regular contact with STCs teachers.
Village key persons Influential people -Encourage active part. -Capacity building for ME at grass root level. Feed back sharing ( community and ME staff). - ME at local level.
School teachers Monitor the Project activities at school level. Organize reflective meetings ME Trainings Feed back sharing ( community and ME staff). - ME at local level.
Community Organizers Provide balanced diet at schools. - Reflective meetings Impact assess. reviews. -Coordin. with STCs. - Feed back sharing
Parents/ Community Beneficiaries Sampling interviews for Project impact assessment. Monitoring of children education and nutrition lev.
Monitoring Staff Do M coordi. with sta.hol at grass root level. - Reflective meetings. - Cap. building for ME. - liaison with stakeholders. - ME of project activities.
6
Major Constraints

• Question of active participation of all
  stakeholders.
• Agreement of donors for reviewed ME system.
• Efforts for resolving problems
• Information sharing meetings with donors /
  stakeholders regarding flaws in existing ME
  system.
• A brief presentation regarding comprehensive ME
  system and project impact assessment.
• Discussion regarding advantages of improved and
  flexible ME system.
• Strong liaison with stakeholders.
• Emphasis on greater participation of stakeholders
  through highlighting its importance in project
  activities.

7
Time Table
S Activities Timeframe
01- Analysis of existing ME system. May-2004
02- Meeting(s) with project director Core team. Jun-2004
03- Meeting(s) with Donors / stakeholders. Jul-2004
04- Development of a new participatory ME system. Aug-2004
05- PPME trainings of Monitoring staff. Aug-2004
06- Implementation of new ME activities. Sep-2004
07- Impact Assessment activities. Dec-2004
8
ME of Action plan

• Through monthly meetings with monitoring staff.
• Quarterly reviews with all stakeholders.
• Analysis of field visit reports of monitoring
  activities.
• Analysis of quantitative qualitative data.
• Key Evaluation Questions
• To what extent stakeholders actively participated
  in ME system establishment and its
  implementation?
• What are the key advantages of new ME system?
• To what extent project objectives have been
  achieved by applying new ME system?
• Does improved ME system facilitating in impact
  assessment of the project?

9
Information needs Indicators

• Percentage of stakeholders participated in ME
  system establishment.
• List of ME activities developed / improved.
• Percent of stakeholders participated in
  implementation of MEactivities.
• Extent of the project outcomes/ results.
• Relationship of ME system with project
  sustainability.
• - No of trainings provided to community
  members
• - Relationship of stakeholders
• - Capacities of Monitoring staff
• - Capabilities of community people
• Resources
• Financial resources
• Human resources in terms of commitment of all
  stakeholders and their strong participation.

10
Thankyou

• ?