Augmenting Antidepressant Treatments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Augmenting Antidepressant Treatments

Description:

Switch (reasonable choices for a second antidepressant include a different SSRI ... Wife said 'normal self' 12/12 remained well. 15/12 stopped medication. 18/12 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: pjco
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Augmenting Antidepressant Treatments


1
Augmenting Antidepressant Treatments
  • PJ Cowen
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford

2
Conflict of Interest
  • I have an interest in relation to one or more
    organisations that could be perceived as a
    possible conflict of interest in the context of
    this presentation. The organisations are
  • GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Lundbeck, Servier, Wyeth

3
Staging of Treatment Resistance
  • A Treatment Non-Responder
  • Lack of response to a single adequate
    antidepressant trial
  • B Treatment Resistant Depression
  • Lack of response to two trials of antidepressants
    from different classes
  • C Chronic Resistant Depression
  • Resistance to several antidepressant trials,
    including
  • augmentation, over a period of at least 12 months

  • (Souery et al
    1999)

4
Early Pharmacological Approaches to TRD (NICE)
  • Raise dose (allows time for natural recovery to
    start and to carry out further assessments)
  • Switch (reasonable choices for a second
    antidepressant include a different SSRI or
    mirtazapine, but consideration may also be given
    to other alternatives, including moclobemide,
    reboxetine and tricyclic antidepressants (except
    dosulepin).

5
Different Class vs SSRIs Switch in SSRI-Resistant
patients
Papakostos et al 2007
6
Further Management (NICE Guidelines)
  • Add CBT
  • Lithium Augmentation
  • Antidepressant combination (mirtazapine or
    mianserin with SSRI)
  • Phenelzine
  • Augmentation with anticonvulsants, T3, pindolol,
    buspirone NOT recommended

7
MAOI in TRD
  • 42 year old man first episode of depression 9/12
    duration. Off work six months. Failed SSRI
    treatment, TCA and lithium augmentation. No
    response to CBT. Refused ECT
  • Low in mood, poor sleep, anhedonic, poor energy
    motivation, quite retarded. Normally energetic,
    high performing, sociable.
  • 1/12 Switch to venlafaxine- no response at at
    maximum dose
  • 2/12 Add olanzapine. Some improvement. Tried to
    go back to work but couldnt carry on because of
    anxiety and poor concentration

8
JR Continued
  • 6/12 Failed to improve with T3, lamotrigine and
    further course of CBT. Lost job. Family in
    financial crisis. Marital difficulties. Clear
    suicidal ideas for the first time.
  • 7/12 Withdrew venlafaxine, started isocarboxazid
  • 8/12 suddenly recovered. Very energetic, sleep 6
    hours a night. Found new highly paid job. Wife
    said normal self
  • 12/12 remained well
  • 15/12 stopped medication
  • 18/12 Remained well. Stopped attending follow-up.
    Sent a thank you card Until its really dark you
    cant see the stars.

9
Augmentation as a Strategy
  • Useful in more treatment resistant patients
  • Helpful when there is a partial response to
    therapy
  • More risk of adverse reactions
  • Usually more expensive
  • Can involve combination of antidepressants (eg
    mirtazapine to SSRI)
  • Can involve addition of agent that is not
    regarded as antidepressant in its own right (eg
    lithium)

10
Antidepressant Augmentation
  • Lithium addition
  • Tri-iodothyronine
  • Pindolol
  • SSRI NA drug (reboxetine, TCA)
  • SSRI mianserin/mirtazapine
  • SSRI atypical antipsychotic

11
Lithium Augmentation of Antidepressant treatment
Crossley and Bauer 2007
12
Triodothyronine and Pindolol Augmentation
  • Drug (n) Odds Ratio
    NNT
  • Triodothyronine (95) 1.15
    13
  • Pindolol (80) 1.0 NS

Aronson et al. 1996Perez et al, 1999
13
Mianserin/Mirtazapine Augmentation of SSRIs
  • a2-adrenoceptor blockade should increase some
    aspects of NA neurotransmission. Might also
    facilitate 5-HT neurotransmission indirectly
  • 5-HT2A/2C blockade might facilitate 5-HT and DA
    release in frontal cortex

14
Randomised study of sertraline increase and
mianserin augmentation
  • 295 patients received sertraline (50mg for
    four weeks and 100mg for two weeks without
    response). HAM-D gt 17
  • Randomised to
  • (i)100mg sertraline mianserin 30mg (n98)
  • (ii) 200mg sertraline (n 98)
  • (iii)Continue 100mg sertraline (n 99)
  • For further five
    weeks

15
Randomised study of sertraline increase and
mianserin augmentation
( responders)




Licht Qvitzau, 2002
16
Mirtazapine augmentation of SSRI Treatment
  • 26 patients on SSRI-like-drugs, randomised to
    either mirtazapine augmentation (15-30mg at
    night) or placebo for 4 weeks
  • Mirtazapine
    Placebo
  • Response 7/11 (64) 3/15 (20)
  • p 0.048
  • (Carpenter et al, 2002)

17
Outcome of STARD augmentation
  • Entry 80 recurrent or chronic depression. Mean
    episodes 6, Mean duration 25 months.

Bupropion
Buspirone
Tranylcypromine
Lithium
Ven Mirtaz
T3
N 2876
N 279
N 286
N 69
N 73
N 58
N 51
Trivedi et al 2006 Madhukar et al 2006
Nierenberg et al 2006 McGrath et al 2006
18
Outcome of STARD augmentation
  • Entry 80 recurrent or chronic depression. Mean
    episodes 6, Mean duration 25 months.

Bupropion
Buspirone
Tranylcypromine
Lithium
Ven Mirtaz
T3
N 2876
N 279
N 286
N 69
N 73
N 58
N 51
Trivedi et al 2006 Madhukar et al 2006
Nierenberg et al 2006 McGrath et al 2006
19
Outcome of STARD augmentation
  • Entry 80 recurrent or chronic depression. Mean
    episodes 6, Mean duration 25 months.

Bupropion
Buspirone
Tranylcypromine
Lithium
Ven Mirtaz
T3
N 2876
N 279
N 286
N 69
N 73
N 58
N 51
Trivedi et al 2006 Madhukar et al 2006
Nierenberg et al 2006 McGrath et al 2006
20
Outcome of STARD augmentation
  • Entry 80 recurrent or chronic depression. Mean
    episodes 6, Mean duration 25 months.

Bupropion
Buspirone
Tranylcypromine
Lithium
Ven Mirtaz
T3
N 2876
N 279
N 286
N 69
N 73
N 51
N 58
Trivedi et al 2006 Madhukar et al 2006
Nierenberg et al 2006 McGrath et al 2006
21
Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs Used to Augment
SSRIs
  • (nM) 5-HT2A 5-HT2C Ratio
  • Risperid 0.4 30 30
  • Quetiap 120 1200 10
  • Olanzap 3.0 10 3.3
  • Aripirazole 10.0 30 3.0

22
5-HT2A and 5-HT2C Antagonists Increase
Extracellular 5-HT
Boothman et al 2006
23
OFC study in TRD
  • Failure to respond to at least two
    antidepressants including a trial of prospective
    fluoxetine
  • HAM-D remained gt 18
  • Randomised to
  • fluoxetine 50mg OLZ 6mg (n 200)
  • fluoxetine 50mg (n 206)
  • OLZ 6mg (n199)

24
Response and Remission Rates in
OFC/fluoxetine/olanzapine Trial


Thase et al 2007
25
Meta-Analysis of Atypical Antipsychotic
augmentation of SSRI Treatment
Papakostos et al 2007
26
NNTs of Some Treatments for Resistant Depression
  • Treatment
    NNT
  • Venlafaxine vs SSRI (switch) 11
  • Lithium Augmentation 5
  • Triodothyronine Augmentation 13
  • Atypical Augmentation 5

27
Conclusions
  • Resistant depression is common in psychiatric
    practice but evidence base for treatment is
    rather thin
  • Antidepressant combination treatment is
    increasingly popular but lithium augmentation
    remains the treatment with the best evidence
  • Conventional MAOIs are still worth trying
  • Augmentation with atypical antipsychotic drugs is
    probably effective but the adverse effect burden
    can be troublesome
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com