HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki

Description:

0.1. Z. r. Zvertex. 1st sampling. 2nd sampling. Level-1: h, f. 0.1. 168 mm. HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki. April, 21st 24th 2005 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:17
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: stathisst
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki


1
Studies on the High Level Trigger System of the
ATLAS Detector Stefanidis E. University College
London
2
Outline
  • ? ATLAS Trigger System
  • The challenge.
  • Overview.
  • ? Level-2 Trigger
  • The Region of Interest mechanism.
  • ? Reduced Region of Interest
  • Motivation.
  • Methodology.
  • Implementation.
  • ? Results.
  • ? Conclusions.

3
The ATLAS Trigger System The challenge
  • Proton bunch crossing rate of 40 MHz
  • Design (high) luminosity of 1034 cm-2s-1
  • spp-inel 80 mb _at_ ?s 14 TeV
  • Signal events are very rare
  • H?gg rate is 10-13 of the LHC interaction rate.
    (mH120 GeV)
  • Limited storage capability High Granularity
    of the sub-systems
  • event size 1.6 MB just before storage.
  • storage rate of O (200) Hz.

4
The ATLAS Trigger System Overview
  • LVL1
  • 40 MHz ? 75 kHz
  • lt 2.5 µs
  • Hardware trigger
  • Coarse granularity
  • Calorimeter and Muon Trigger stations only
  • LVL2
  • 75 kHz ? 2 kHz
  • 10 ms
  • Full granularity information from both ID and
    Calorimeter
  • RoI mechanism
  • Event Filter (EF)
  • 2 kHz ? 100 Hz
  • ? 2s
  • Sophisticated algorithms
  • Alignment data available

5
Level-2 Trigger The RoI mechanism
How the RoI is currently constructed
  • With the RoI mechanism we manage to
    minimise the
  • Processing time.
  • Network traffic.

6
Reduced Region of Interest motivation
  • The size of the RoI in (eta, phi) space has been
    determined almost arbitrarily.
  • The RoI currently takes into account the full
    range of the beam spread.
  • Better algorithm design can reduce the size.
  • Faster decisions (and more efficient?),
    especially in a demanding environment.
  • Never before has been a detailed study for
    optimising this size.
  • Main tool the 1st and 2nd samplings of the EM
    Calorimeter.
  • High granularity information at Level-2.

7
Reduced Region of Interest methodology
1. Determine the position of the middle of the
1st and 2nd sampling.
2. Extrapolate back to the beam.
3. Open 3sigma around the Z found by the
Calorimeter
The RoI is reduced by 30!
8
Reduced Region of Interest implementation
1. Parameterize the middle of the 1st and the 2nd
EM samplings
2. Parameterize the width to open.
9
Results
  • Using our Tracking Algorithm we can test the
    method
  1. in terms of efficiency
  1. in terms of timing

10
Conclusions
  • A new method has been applied in order to reduce
    the size of the Region of Interest.
  • Important improvement in terms of efficiency and
    timing even at this preliminary stage.
  • Further/high order corrections and studies are
    being carried out in order to optimize the size.
  • Contacts have started to integrate the new method
    into the official ATLAS Trigger Software.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com