Appendix 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Appendix 4

Description:

Inventories are estimates of releases of selected compounds or groups ... Backyard trash burning - 1000 g ITEQ/y. Not included in inventories ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: patrick377
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Appendix 4


1
  • Appendix 4
  • Patrick H. Dyke Inventories for Persistent
    By-Products of Industrial and Combustion Processes

2
Inventories for Persistent By-Products of
Industrial and Combustion Processes
  • Patrick H Dyke
  • Presentation for UNEP Chemicals Workshop Jan 1999

3
Introduction
  • What and Why
  • How
  • Available data
  • Limitations and Conclusions

4
Basic Concepts
  • Inventories are estimates of releases of selected
    compounds or groups
  • Without knowing the sources how can you control?
  • Usually per year
  • Used to focus emissions controls - identify the
    low hanging fruit
  • Show trends

5
Inventory Compilation
  • Becoming well established
  • However, no universally accepted approach
  • Various limitations
  • Assumptions make important differences -
    therefore hard to compare one against another
  • Moving target!

6
Basic approach
  • Screen to identify processes of interest
  • Generate emissions factors and activity
    statistics
  • Annual emission Em factor x Activity statistic
  • Compile list of sources

7
Top down or bottom up?
  • Sector average emissions and total production
  • eg 5Mt of MSW incinerated with emission of 5
    micro g/ t 25 g/y
  • Plant by plant annual emission summed for all
    plants
  • eg a g/y b g/y ... Z g/y
  • Will depend on circumstances

8
Setting a baseline
  • Emissions are changing rapidly
  • Must have consistency
  • Must recognise technological development
  • up-grading of existing plants
  • closure of polluting plants
  • opening of new plants

9
Data handling
  • Mass emissions or toxic equivalent?
  • Data quantity versus utility?
  • Criteria for acceptance/rejection
  • Handling of non-detected results
  • How to handle categories that cannot be
    estimated?
  • What is the end use?

10
Data availability
  • Most emission test data comes from limited
    countries Germany, Holland, UK, US
  • Is it representative?
  • Some will be but this cannot be assumed
  • Need background information

11
Dioxin inventories
  • Heidi Fiedlers compilation of inventories
  • 15 countries only
  • fewer still for releases to land and water
  • hard to compare

12
1995 Air emissions (H Fiedler),g ITEQ/y
13
UK PCDD/F Emissions to Air - 1993
14
UK PCDD/F Emissions - future estimate (post 1996)
15
contribution in Austria (PCDD/F)
16
Germany air emissions PCDD/F g ITEQ/y
17
Inventory of PCDD/F
  • Some common points
  • old MSW incinerators - large source
  • metals industry not recognised initially
  • Different patterns from country to country
  • Rapid changes occurring
  • Can be substantial releases to land and in
    products

18
US EPA Inventory
  • Substantial effort
  • Still very uncertain
  • Major amount in products

19
US EPA PCDD/F (g ITEQ/y) 1998
20
Poorly quantified sources
  • Landfill fires - 1000 g ITEQ/y
  • Backyard trash burning - 1000 g ITEQ/y
  • Not included in inventories
  • No estimate for several metal processes and in
    particular Magnesium manufacture

21
Pointers
  • Developed countries controlling emissions from
    MSWI
  • Uncontrolled sources become more important
  • eg domestic combustion, accidental fires
  • Likely to be similar in developing countries
  • Products and chemicals?

22
Other chemicals
  • Wide range
  • Not so widely studied
  • Some data on PAH, HCB and PCB
  • Are they the same sources?
  • Are the control techniques the same as for PCDD/F?

23
UK PCB releases (1993 base)
24
UK PAH emissions t/y
25
Draft Canadian HCB emissions (1998 draft, average)
26
Conclusions
  • We have the tools
  • But-
  • we need a systematic approach
  • we need more data
  • we need to be aware of differences between
  • countries
  • technologies, sites
  • year on year changes

27
Conclusions (2)
  • Resource intensive process to carry out full
    assessments
  • Use screening methods
  • these must be reflective of regional/local needs
  • Be driven by hazard/risk assessment of the
    chemicals to be addressed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com