Title: Radiation Belt Precipitation due to Manmade VLF Transmissions
1Radiation Belt Precipitation due to Manmade VLF
Transmissions Satellite Observations
Rory J Gamble1, Craig J Rodger1, Mark A
Clilverd2, Neil R Thomson1, Simon L Stewart1,
Robert J McCormick1, Michel Parrot3, Jean-André
Sauvaud4, Jean-Jacques Berthelier5.
1 - Department of Physics, University of Otago,
Dunedin, New Zealand 2 - Physical Sciences
Division, British Antarctic Survey (NERC),
Cambridge, United Kingdom 3 - Laboratoire de
Physique et Chimie de l'Environnement, Orleans,
France 4 - Centre d'Étude Spatiale des
Rayonnements, Toulouse, France 5 - Centre
d'Études des Environnements Terrestre et
Planétaires, Saint Maur des Fosses, France
2Introduction/Motivation
- We know that inner belt losses are dominated by
waves, but don't know relative importance of
different types. - Manmade VLF transmissions may
dominate losses in the inner radiation belts
Abel and Thorne, 1998 - Particle enhancements
not well-tied to VLF wave observations. -
Occurrence frequency of drift-loss cone
enhancements above transmitters is unknown. -
DEMETER satellite can be used to study trapped
electron population characteristics. -
Ground-based Radiation Belt Remediation.
3History
Imhof et al. (1973) - VLF transmitter
interactions first observed as narrow peaks in
satellite electron spectrometer data. - Energy of
peak flux followed first-order resonance
relationship for a single VLF transmitter.
4Imhof, W. L. et al. (1973), Dynamic Variations in
Intensity and Energy Spectra of Electrons in the
Inner Radiation Belt. J. Geophys Res. 78 (22).
5History
Datlowe and Imhof (1990) - Determined that
resonances observed by the S81-1 satellite are
probably due to NWC and NAA. - Quantitatively
showed that interaction is by first order
cyclotron resonance.
6History
Figure 1. Datlowe, D. (2006), Differences between
transmitter precipitation peaks and storm
injection peaks in low altitude energetic
electron spectra, J. Geophys Res., 111, A12202,
doi10.1029/2006JA011957
7DEMETER Satellite
Detection of Electro-Magnetic Emissions
Transmitted from Earthquake Regions - Developed
by CNES (France)? - Instruments including ICE
(Electric field detector)? IDP (Energetic
particle detector)? - Data for invariant
latitudes below 65, L1-7 - Low Earth orbit
710km altitude - Sun-synchronous polar orbit (see
next slide)?
http//smsc.cnes.fr/DEMETER/index.htm
8DEMETER Orbit Configuration
9DEMETER - ICE
-Records one component of E field vector -We use
VLF power spectrum data (type '1132')? - 1024
channel FFT - 19.5Hz 20kHz (19.5Hz
/channel)? - Averaged spectrum given every 4s
10DEMETER Nighttime ICE
World map ice, showing nwc, at night time.
11DEMETER Daytime ICE
Received power 1200 times lower over transmitter
during local daytime.
12DEMETER - IDP
- Records energetic electron fluxes spectra -
Very good quality - 17.8 keV channel
resolution - 73keV 2.35MeV (128 channels)? -
Complete spectrum every 4s - Looks
perpendicularly to the orbital plane of satellite
(never illuminated by the sun)? - Measures
particle fluxes inside (or just outside) the
drift loss cone.
13DEMETER Daytime IDP
14DEMETER Nighttime IDP
15NWC VLF Transmitter
- - US Naval VLF transmitter (Northwest Cape,
Australia)? - - Well located to influence inner belt energetic
particles - - higher latitude transmitters interact with
energies lower than IDP instrument can detect. - - immediately east of the SAMA
- - L1.45, inner radiation belt
- - One of the worlds most powerful 1000kW
radiated power - - Frequency 19.8kHz, within DEMETERs 20kHz
resolution - - Signal strength is recorded by OmniPAL reciever
in Dunedin (AARDDVARK network).
16NWC
Dunedin
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19NWC VLF Transmitter
20NWC VLF Transmitter
21Single Half-Orbit West of NWC
22Single Half-Orbit West of NWC
Pcolors of ICE and IDP as a function of time
23Single Half-Orbit East of NWC
24Single Half-Orbit East of NWC
Pcolors of ICE and IDP as a function of time,
including wisp
25Wisp Characteristics
26Wisp Characteristics
27Wisp Characteristics
28Wisp Characteristics
29Wisp Occurence
- Data from 12 August 26 September 2005
period - Half orbits which pass within /- 25º
longitude of the Tx are selected for closer
inspection. - These half orbits are visually
inspected for the presence of wisps (blind
inspection)? - Half orbits are sorted into
day/night and east/west orbits
Over 95 of night, eastern orbits showed wisps!
30NWC Dependence
- Apart from short periods of weekly daytime
routine maintenance, NWC is rarely down -
Continuous recordings of NWC signal strength show
that NWC was offline for 15 days (13 28 June
2005)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35NWC Dependence
- Apart from short periods of weekly routine
maintenance, NWC is rarely down - Continuous
recordings of NWC signal strength show that NWC
was offline for 15 days (13 28 June 2005). -
All suitable orbital passes from this period were
examined. Result No wisps seen while NWC was
offline.
36Wisp Characteristics
The L range, energy range and maximum flux
enhancement (w.r.t. a reference background
spectrum) was recorded for each wisp.
Lower energy bound limited by instrument
Upper energy can be as large as 453 keV
Peak flux can be as large as 3600 times
background levels
37 38 39Variation with L of the first-order equatorial
cyclotron resonant energy with a 19.8 kHz wave
(black), and the plasmaspheric electron number
density used in this calculation (dashed gray).
Compiled by C. J. Rodger using Chang and Inan
1983, Carpenter and Anderson 1992, Mahaian
and Brace 1969
40NPM Hawaii
41NPM Hawaii
- L1.17, inner radiation belt - Also potentially
well positioned for study - more equatorial
than NWC - further east of NWC - Less
powerful 500kW radiated power - Expect higher
interaction energy No evidence of wisps was
found due to NPM
42Conclusions
- DEMETER is used to study enhancements in DLC
electron population due to NWC - NWC operation
directly associated with DLC enhancements -
Interaction relies on night time ionosphere -
Very common 95 of suitable orbits showed
clear interaction. - Also using DEMETER to
characterise stormtime processes
43January 2005 Storm Period
44January 2005 Storm Period
45Storm Period Movie
46Acknowledgements
Craig Rodger Neil Thomson Mark Clilverd Simon
Stewart Robert McCormick Polar Environments
Research Theme CNES/DEMETER