Essays on Emerging Applied Methodologies for the Valuation of Technology

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Essays on Emerging Applied Methodologies for the Valuation of Technology

Description:

Applied to appraising capital investments in many industries ... Based on the application of the classic Black-Scholes options pricing model to real assets ... –

Number of Views:14
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: suvanka
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Essays on Emerging Applied Methodologies for the Valuation of Technology


1
Essays on Emerging Applied Methodologies for the
Valuation of Technology
  • PhD Summer Project
  • Suvankar Ghosh

2
3 Essays
  • An Adoption Decision Model for Emerging Capital
    Budgeting Methodologies
  • A Real Options Approach to Enterprise Integration
    Investments
  • A Nested Options Model for Cellular Manufacturing
  • Todays Talk is Mainly About Paper 1

3
Status of the Essays
Essay Status Future Work
An Adoption Decision Model for Emerging Capital Budgeting Methodologies Appeared in 2006 Annual Decision Sciences Institute Conference Being continuously improved to make it journal ready
A Real Options Approach to Enterprise Integration Investments Practitioner version of this article exists Substantial work remains to make it suitable for an academic journal
A Nested Options Model for Cellular Manufacturing Accepted for publication in 2007 Proceedings of the Annual DSI Conference Substantial additional research needs to be done. So far only a conceptual model
4
Overview of Adoption Model Paper
  • Build a theoretical model for the acceptance by
    industry of new capital budgeting methodologies
    such as Real Options Analysis (RO) and Economic
    Value Added (EVA)
  • Key model constructs
  • Perception of theoretical soundness
  • Perception of practical applicability
  • Methodology Adoption Model is analogous to TAM
  • Formulate measures of the sentiment of academic
    and practitioner communities. Sentiments are
    computed by scoring academic and practitioner
    articles
  • Propositions of Methodology Acceptance Model
    (MADM) and empirical sentiment data to conclude
    if EVA or RO is more likely to be embraced

5
Motivation
  • Businesses are unhappy with the tools they have
    to measure their investments in IT or
    manufacturing technology
  • Historical methodologies for appraising capital
    investments have major shortcomings
  • Net Present Value (NPV)
  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR
  • Return on Investment (ROI)
  • Payback Period
  • Companies are turning to new approaches such as
    EVA and RO

6
Two New Methodologies
  • EVA Economic Value Added
  • Originated in the industry
  • Popularized by Stern-Stewart
  • Real Options Analysis (RO)
  • Originated in the Black-Scholes theory of pricing
    of financial options
  • Applied to the pricing of real assets
  • Both EVA and RO have been around since the 1990s
  • Applied to appraising capital investments in many
    industries
  • biotech, oil and gas, telecommunications

7
EVA Basic Definitions
  • EVA NOPAT COC
  • NOPAT is Net Operating Profit After Tax
  • COC is the Cost of all Capital

8
Real Options
  • Based on the application of the classic
    Black-Scholes options pricing model to real
    assets
  • An investment opportunity is an option on an
    underlying asset

9
Methodology Acceptance Decision Model (MADM)

Theoretical Soundness of Methodology
Attitude to Methodology
Likelihood of Acceptance
Practical Applicability of Methodology
10
Key Lemma on Relative Acceptance Likelihood
  • Methodology A has greater likelihood of adoption
    than methodology B if A is superior to B in one
    of the two dimensions of theoretical soundness
    and practical applicability and at least as good
    as B in the other dimension.

11
Operationalizing the Model
  • Define proxy variables for the constructs of
    Theoretical Soundness and Practical Applicability
  • Sentiment of the academic community as expressed
    in publications in academic literature is the
    proxy for theoretical soundness
  • Sentiment of the practitioner community as
    expressed in practitioner literature is proxy for
    practical applicability
  • Score the academic and practitioner article
    depending on whether they are favorable or
    unfavorable to the methodology
  • 3 Very Favorable, 2 Favorable, 1 Partly
    Favorable, 0 Neutral, -1 Partly Unfavorable, -2
    Unfavorable, -3 Very Unfavorable

12
Sample
  • Sample academic and practitioner articles on EVA
    and ReOA from 1992 to 2005
  • 25 sample of the 56 quarters in 1992-2005
  • Sample drawn from EBSCO electronic databases --
    a major vendor of information services
  • Business Source Premier 1,100 peer-reviewed
    business journals
  • Academic Search Premier 3,600 peer-reviewed
    journals
  • Total of 87 articles on EVA and ReOA which were
    content-analyzed and scored

13
Data Analysis
  • A two-element vector of sentiment based on
    article scores for each methodology
  • 14 instances of the sentiment vector for ReOA and
    EVA
  • Perform MANOVA analysis to test various
    hypotheses about the interest levels in ReOA and
    EVA

Academic Sentiment Practitioner Sentiment
14
Results
  • Manova Omnibus test
  • H1 There is no difference between ReOA and EVA
    in the overall sentiment considering both
    academic and practitioner sentiment
  • Result Hypothesis was easily rejected at a0.05
    Wilks Lamda was 18.62 with p-value of less than
    0.0001
  • Univariate Protected F tests
  • H2 There is no difference in the academic
    sentiment between EVA and ReOA
  • Result We cannot reject this hypothesis at
    a0.05. F-value is 1.59 with p-value of 0.218

15
Results (cont.)
  • H3 There is no difference in the practitioner
    sentiment between EVA and ReOA
  • Result Hypothesis is rejected at a0.05, F-value
    is 32.11 with p-value of less than 0.0001
  • Overall Findings from Analysis of Sentiment
  • There is a difference in the overall sentiment
    between EVA and ReOA, and the practitioner
    community is the driver of this difference

16
Conclusions
  • EVA appears to have a better likelihood of
    adoption compared to RO. Also it appears as
    practitioner interest in EVA increases, that is
    fostering an acceleration of academic interest in
    EVA
  • Firms should first adopt EVA and then RO
  • Migrating to EVA-based financial system however
    is not easy
  • Implementation challenges can be formidable
  • Could lead to losing sight of other critical
    elements to survival like cash flow
  • Critical success factors include management
    commitment, effective corporate governance
    system, and comprehensive training
  • EVA training programs are not cheap and can cost
    anywhere from 250,000 to 1M depending on size
    of company
  • RO bears watching. Efforts underway to simplify
    RO for practitioners such as making it more
    NPV-like in how its is operationalized (Feinstein
    and Lander, 2002)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com